PleaseHelpMe
•
22 Apr 2012, 12:45
•
Journals
HelloXfireCommunity,dearFriends.ThisJournalIsSupposedToBeAsurveyForMySchoolProject.
ItsAboutLearningNewTechniqueToWriteWithoutSpaces.
WithThisMethodYouCanSaveYourThumbAbout15,0percentage/100charactersOnceYouLearnIt.
ImAlsoUpForFeedBack.DoYouFindThisHardToRead?DoYouHaveToConcentrateOnThisTextMoreThanYouNormallyDo?AreYouBothered?PerhapsMad?IwouldReallyMuchAppreciateYourFeedBack.
Edit:DoYouFindTheFollowingHardToRead?
CheersSample.
Edit2
The 2nd part of the survey - The real part
I was checking how many users were online from 16:57 - 23:01 CET while my journal was on the front page (at least on 1280x1024 resolution, don't know if it matters on this site)
Log:
CET+1
17:57 - 277
18:02 - 288
18:10 - 264
18:21 - 291
18:30 - 265
18:40 - 282
18:50 - 335
19:00 - 292
19:10 - 276
19:20 - 262
crossfire down 19:29 - 19:32, 502 Bad Gateway
19:32 - 188
crossfire down 18:33 - 19:41, 502 Bad Gateway
19:43 - 176
19:50 - 169
crossfire down, 502 Bad Gateway
20:00 - 265
20:10 - 353
20:20 - 296
20:30 - 294
20:40 - 294
20:50 - 304
21:00 - 319
21:10 - 354
21:22 - 326
21:30 - 302
21:40 - 285
21:50 - 296
22:00 - 301
22:19 - 298
22:37 - 288
22:54 - 310
23:10 - 306
23:29 - 341
23:40 - 304
23:56 - 275
00:01 - 247
Average users online: ~285,971
Also checked users that were browsing crossfire offline. Average -80 less than online. So I assume that every user who was online, checked my journal.
Based on:
- I'm known for the community (That's not egoistic, its true. People read mostly journals that are written by somebody they know)
In 364 minutes everyone checks the journal section at least once, I'm quite sure. New users - I can safely multiply total users by 2 so after all 285,971 + (285,971-80) * 2 = 696,942 at least checked my journal.
I asked people that I would really much appreciate if they help me with my survey. That was clear after the first line.
I was polite, friendly. Still only 12 guys helped me with my survey (12/696,942 = 0,01722 = 1,7% | of total who read the journal).
It didn't take more than 5 mins to read through that text and help me to get a bigger sample of users.
It's shocking how unhelpful crossfire users are :/ After all I think unforgiven was right, this community is rotten.
SsAP, you can be proud of yourself.
So why didn't you help me? Did you read the comments and thought: case closed? Explain yourself please.
ItsAboutLearningNewTechniqueToWriteWithoutSpaces.
WithThisMethodYouCanSaveYourThumbAbout15,0percentage/100charactersOnceYouLearnIt.
ImAlsoUpForFeedBack.DoYouFindThisHardToRead?DoYouHaveToConcentrateOnThisTextMoreThanYouNormallyDo?AreYouBothered?PerhapsMad?IwouldReallyMuchAppreciateYourFeedBack.
Edit:DoYouFindTheFollowingHardToRead?
CheersSample.
Edit2
The 2nd part of the survey - The real part
I was checking how many users were online from 16:57 - 23:01 CET while my journal was on the front page (at least on 1280x1024 resolution, don't know if it matters on this site)
Log:
CET+1
17:57 - 277
18:02 - 288
18:10 - 264
18:21 - 291
18:30 - 265
18:40 - 282
18:50 - 335
19:00 - 292
19:10 - 276
19:20 - 262
crossfire down 19:29 - 19:32, 502 Bad Gateway
19:32 - 188
crossfire down 18:33 - 19:41, 502 Bad Gateway
19:43 - 176
19:50 - 169
crossfire down, 502 Bad Gateway
20:00 - 265
20:10 - 353
20:20 - 296
20:30 - 294
20:40 - 294
20:50 - 304
21:00 - 319
21:10 - 354
21:22 - 326
21:30 - 302
21:40 - 285
21:50 - 296
22:00 - 301
22:19 - 298
22:37 - 288
22:54 - 310
23:10 - 306
23:29 - 341
23:40 - 304
23:56 - 275
00:01 - 247
Average users online: ~285,971
Also checked users that were browsing crossfire offline. Average -80 less than online. So I assume that every user who was online, checked my journal.
Based on:
- I'm known for the community (That's not egoistic, its true. People read mostly journals that are written by somebody they know)
In 364 minutes everyone checks the journal section at least once, I'm quite sure. New users - I can safely multiply total users by 2 so after all 285,971 + (285,971-80) * 2 = 696,942 at least checked my journal.
I asked people that I would really much appreciate if they help me with my survey. That was clear after the first line.
I was polite, friendly. Still only 12 guys helped me with my survey (12/696,942 = 0,01722 = 1,7% | of total who read the journal).
It didn't take more than 5 mins to read through that text and help me to get a bigger sample of users.
It's shocking how unhelpful crossfire users are :/ After all I think unforgiven was right, this community is rotten.
SsAP, you can be proud of yourself.
So why didn't you help me? Did you read the comments and thought: case closed? Explain yourself please.
orginal text:
HelloXfireCommunity,dearFriends.
ThisJournalIsSupposedToBeAsurveyForMySchoolProject.ItsAboutLearningNewTechniqueToWriteWithoutSpaces.
WithThisMethodYouCanSaveYourFingersAbout14,56percentageOnceYouLearnIt.
ImAlsoUpForFeedBack.DoYouFindThisHardToRead?DoYouHaveToConcentrateOnThisTextMoreThanYouNormallyDo?AreYouBothered?PerhapsMad?IwouldReallyMuchAppreciateYourFeedBack.
CheersSample
it__________is__________not__________hard__________to__________read__________that__________,__________do__________you__________find__________this__________hard__________to__________read__________?.
advanced mathematics cannot into logic??
though, to be fair, it saves diskspace and bandwidth. so i'd rate it 2/10
e: pressing shift really is a lot slower than hammering the spacebar.
i calculated the first line 100 presses /normal
2nd version: 85 presses
e: if it's not clear enough, yes find it still fairly easy to read. though that could be because i had already read the first text and knew what the 2nd contained. use another example.
fordifferentspecialcharactERSthelastthreeforexclamationmarksinceitsusedtheleastinmyopinioN
howaboutthelasttwoforaquestionmaRKsinceitsusedmoreoftenbutnotasoftenasdotSandoneletterfordotS
(had to format a bit since crossfire layout doens't display the whole text for me)
but yea, imo leaving ?!., in and only save spaces is easier^^
on teillä vittu kouluprojektit
e. But then u hape to press shift when u type :/ and i find using space much more convenient
it__________is__________not__________hard__________to__________read__________that__________,__________do___
2nd was much harder as it takes time to see where one word ends and second starts.
I have to agree with that. But it takes definitely more time and concentration for me to read it compared to text with spaces, still no problem to read it at all. Probably just a matter of practice.