Dear Clanbase

by SIMOON • 9 Jun 2012, 14:28 • Journals
If you force the noshow score to 4-0 instead of 1-0, you won't have any problem anymore.

But you can still leave it to 1-0 cause it's actually funny to see mad journals of spanish nerds.


image: tumblr_m3e4wixYG21qzy9ouo1_500
Comments
19
▼
mamouth 9 Jun 2012, 15:31
J'aime les rousses
▼
Rhand 9 Jun 2012, 15:44
AUX ARMES
▼
Robert 9 Jun 2012, 15:50
I missed CB madness? wtf
▼
Tropic 9 Jun 2012, 15:52
stfu low skill
▼
Mott4 9 Jun 2012, 15:54
Quotemagico on 05/06/12, 12:30:30 PM | Report | Reply

why dont you consider to count noshow/forfeit wins as 4-0 instead of 1-0? that would be better to avoid this kind of situations... for example in CoD we give 25-0 win for noshow or forfeit to punish the team who broke the rules...
▼
FLExican 9 Jun 2012, 16:03
hahaha u care to much :D
▼
miNd 9 Jun 2012, 16:54
why has this become so big thing now?
▼
zeKxa 9 Jun 2012, 16:58
aaaaah Kate..
▼
redeu 9 Jun 2012, 19:00
Best regards!
▼
w0nd3r 9 Jun 2012, 19:00
Explain or die.
▼
ohurcool 10 Jun 2012, 04:50
The system defaults noshow/forfeit scores to 1-0, so they must be changed manually. This change was made for the 2on2 and 3on3 OCs but was somehow skipped over for the 6on6 OC. In the future, we will be making sure that the scores for noshows and forfeits are 4-0. :)

Supski should have advanced regardless, according to the rules:

http://clanbase.ggl.com/rules.php?lid=12642#chap_1552

QuoteGroup rankings are worked out by the following rules, in order of importance:
1. Number of Wins.
2. Number of Draws.
3. Result of the matches between the tied clans.


Both teams had the same number of wins (2) and draws (0), but Supski beat Bobots (noshow) during the groupstage. GoldoraK was just being nice by allowing them to play a "decider" match.

Not an "official" explanation per se, but hopefully it makes a little more sense now. :)
Back to top