educational journal
•
11 Mar 2013, 19:23
•
Journals
SUBJECT IS: copyright, ownership, software/art development policies, now and in future
relevant to this GAMING community, because of game development discussion of code/art copyright and ownership
presentation(in english):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dTREZNbljY
open discussion(in english):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu9G7uts8og
KNOWLEDGE is free for everyone to use and share
-there is no such thing as illegal download
-we cannot allow to be spyed with the excuse that someone thinks we will be criminals(of actual crimes) someday
relevant to this GAMING community, because of game development discussion of code/art copyright and ownership
presentation(in english):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dTREZNbljY
open discussion(in english):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu9G7uts8og
KNOWLEDGE is free for everyone to use and share
-there is no such thing as illegal download
-we cannot allow to be spyed with the excuse that someone thinks we will be criminals(of actual crimes) someday
Nope, when people invest money to produce something, why should you have the right to have it for free?
You dont go in a store an take stuff because "there is no such a thing as illegal taking"
about your post...........
i dont have the right to have it for free, per se, if i buy it i can do what ever the hell i please with it
example: if i buy a cd, i can use/crop the songs and put in a fragmovie, even mix the tracks
after i buy it noone can forbid me of using it to what ever purpose i intend to use it
Whatever you want to do with it without making money out of that would be the better definition for me.
-sharing with friends over internet is not profiting from it
-on that particular process the only people that get hurt are record companies which only pay 0.005% of benefits to majority of artists(go check)
-if artist is good, it gets publicly spread, making people into buy his albums and redirecting profit directly to artist because these days technology allows people to do so
More about the general filesharing "ethics".
As long as major labels still rule the music business, you wont be able to change the direction the money goes.
if they feel like ofc lol
but its legal, and still, i dont have authorship over that CD
FREE BOOK
actually that's copyright and they can have it removed from sites/youtube if they wanted :P
see the first video for the correct meaning and law perspective of copyright (the 1st 30 min)
and if you think for yourself, would it make sense to charge you for every view of a fragmovie you made ?
Here's a comparison :
If you go to a shop and get a car without paying = stealing.
What if you go to the shop get the car (without paying) and the car still stays in the shop while you still have that car gotten for free?
there is brand and models, if you steal a model there actually are others just like it that stays in the shop
the question is, if u dont own a recipt u cant do shit with it, but if you do, you can tweak, change design, parts, take out the engine and build another car...... its yours
thats is what people who enforce that thinking are afraid of
they are afraid that you can develop a better/economic/fast/ or better looking car and then you are the one making money instead of them
Why should I allow someone to take my hard work (the "frame") and improve it slightly and make money with it without getting my share for doing the main work on the end product?
why would you try to stop someone of improving your work after they buy it from you ? you cant own something that you didnt make/create
that is just strugling the natural evolution of things, if you are already making money from it you can invest it on your own projects and upgrade them, its not correct to create something and make money forever by not making/add anything more or letting others to evolve from it
I manage to develop a pill curing cancer, that pill causes slight headache.
An other company takes my receipt for the pill and adds some of their aspirin-alike product.
TADA, they have a pill which cures cancer and doesnt cause headache, now they sell the pill for 8x the price I do and in adition, my pill gets banned from the market by health&consumer ministries as it causes a slight headache and the other product doesnt.
Now, that doesnt sound fair to me.
you have just admited and aknowledged their product is better than yours, how is that not fair ?
you have created cure for cancer in a pill, your name gets immortalized and certainly you'll get loads of money for it, and you're jealous someone created a better product than you ?? you serious ??
that kind of fear, of not becoming personaly successfull/wealthy, would be the main reason your pill was defective in first place =P
back to main discussion:
if you create a plastic bottle, after i buy it, you dont have any right to tell me what to fill it with, if i please i can even melt it and make another thing more usefull for my personal purposes
If I would spend billions on the develepment of a cancer curing pill, I would of course do it for the profit.
Being a company that can afford the billions for the research, I would have shareholders to please and kids to be fed.
Going back to the music part:
Why should I spend my time and money to create a song, get it recorded, get it mixed so you can take it for your fragmovie (or whatever movie) which you upload on youtube and make money with the viewers?
What have you done to improve my work? You are paying for the sole pleasure of listening to it, not using it to make money.
i dont even understand this, i care about ideias/correct/wrong/basic principles of freedom, every party have corrects and wrongs, none can actually express correctly the views of everyone, this you should know from yourself
now:
with something as big and dificult as a pill that cures cancer, your grandkids would be able to be fed for several generations
the fragmovies are art created by other persons, both you(song artist) and artstar(fragmovie artist, considering syncing frags and song an art) create your arts FOR FUN and for a pleasurable world to live in
heck, even creating an automobile is a fucking art, HOWEVER noone has the right to stop evolution for the better by strugling others creativity
If I would be a musican, I would do it for the money.
If you want to be an artist with your fragmovies, make your own song, pay for its recording and mixing.
You dont stop evolution when protecting values with laws made the right way instead of just dropping all laws around and about it (like the pirate party wants it)
there are free tools to do everything you named, no need to pay(not even for lessons on how to manage those softwares because free tutorials)
values are and should be protected, you are confusing value with money, and thats not the right way to see things clearly
Not saying that quabratolas is right though, he thinks that buying a CD actually grants him any rights, while he just bought a license and nothing more.
if i buy a CD i own the CD and its songs, i cant claim nothing over the work/art done on the making of the CD, but i can put it in a fragmovie on my own freewill or remix the songs and crop parts of it to use as ringtone for instance
then licensing is just a way of monopolizing the song industry and turn it obsolete(prolly not due to the number of singers that exist), but im not gonna pay so others can watch my fragmovie lol
No. Imo if you buy something you should be able to do whatever you wish with it. If I buy something from you it's mine not yours anymore.
And if I develop something better based on something you developed, just develop something better based on what I've developed...If you can, if not, its not my fault or anybody elses except of you.
If you want me not to tweak, modify etc a product that you developed, RENT it to me.
if you buy something ,and then you upload that thing on a site like utorrent
users can download it legal and for free, JUST FOR HOME use , like not sharing that content again (at a cinema,music at a pub/club, etc )
you download a movie, you watch it safe at your place.
you do anything else with it --> legal action shall be taken :S
explain
book says
bottom line, if i have the ideia to make a better mousetrap why should be forbiden just because law doesnt let me, its wrong to stop evolution, new ideias and human imagination over some paper and profits