WANNA PLAY AN OFFICIAL CB?

by Testi • 23 Sep 2013, 16:59 • Journals
Then from this point on you need to have atleast 6 players with UAC guids entered.
thanks for telling us in advance cb.

on a sidenote, we still need a 6o6 offie tonight for 20:30 /q trixor or me on #pluspunt

over

Comments
15
▼
Webe 23 Sep 2013, 18:23
I heard this new rule will boost highly active ladders, 2on2 (activity 22), 3on3 (activity 188) and 6on6 (activity 35) a lot!

This is a great day for ET, see you in the battlefield in upcoming HIGHLY ACTIVE OpenCuP FALL.
▼
rAzZ 23 Sep 2013, 18:41
was just about to play offi with sqzz and mystic but cb wont allow us gg :\
▼
ohurcool 23 Sep 2013, 18:43
You don't have to play with UAC. You simply have to register your UAC User ID to your CB account. It takes less than 30 seconds.

EDIT: http://www.crossfire.nu/journals/150666/uac-clanbase-et
▼
jam 23 Sep 2013, 18:49
We don't have UAC at all :S shouldn't be forced. nobody will play oc/ec If its forced GG
▼
Robert 23 Sep 2013, 18:53
inb4 people have to play, forced and shit and only way to identify players
Parent
▼
Webe 23 Sep 2013, 18:55
but its the only way to identify players, i mean how can we play without it? Its completly out of question to just simply check IP.
Parent
▼
ohurcool 23 Sep 2013, 19:11
Only a few teams would actually use UAC if it wasn't forced. :)
Parent
▼
Enigma 23 Sep 2013, 19:20
What about making it optional for both teams for OC but only if both teams agree?

Means if 1 team disagrees to not use it it would still be forced, but at least there is a choiche if they know the other team well (Hey this is not a big game anyway)
Parent
▼
ohurcool 23 Sep 2013, 19:24
What's the point of that? Why would teams be fine with playing with UAC vs Team A but not with playing with UAC vs Team B?

If a team doesn't want to play with an anticheat, they shouldn't be playing in EC/OC.
Parent
▼
Robert 23 Sep 2013, 19:26
Trust issue?
Parent
▼
Enigma 23 Sep 2013, 19:47
As robert said, there are some teams you just know all the players from and know the chance of them cheating is very slim. It would be at your own risk in that case but at least it's an option kept open.

I'm pretty sure some teams do want to play with the UAC, but I also know plenty of teams who are fine with taking the risk and go on without it if the other team agrees.
Parent
▼
ohurcool 23 Sep 2013, 19:57
It's not just about preventing cheating - it is a way of identifying your opponent. You may think you know who you are playing, but it could be anyone if there's no way of confirming their identity. It may sound silly and paranoid, but it is true.

I understand what you're saying though and will think about it, I guess.
Parent
▼
Artstar 23 Sep 2013, 19:25
actually I kinda like this idea. was pretty much the same around the nopb era, if one team decided they wanted pb then it would be activated during the offi. d:
Parent
▼
milhAus 23 Sep 2013, 19:42
dont have 6 players with UAC ,gg

sorry
Back to top