uac latest ban critics

Hello crossfire.nu

!!! I can't confirm what I am about to write for 100% but there is a good chance my information is legit!!!

In the following text I am going to sum up the information I received from multiple very to rather reliable sources.

As some of you might or might not heard of is there have always been strong rumours about "DExUS" the UAC headadmin being involved in CODEHOOK. This could be one of the reasons CODEHOOK pretty much always been the first to bypass new UAC updates (which tended to be rather inefficient anyway) and has always had a big slovakian clientele.

Now there has been a banwave lately with the following code: "MEH@160913". So some of you might have been wondering why these bans were forced way behind the date the last activity was registered and affected players of completely different games. Well, let me tell you:

They are (can't confirm for 100% sure, but the facts seem to make it more than obvious what happened) based on emails which were leaked from CODEHOOK and matched with UAC accounts in order to gain trust of the users again and achieve donations. As we can see on the UAC website there has been a wave of small donations, from less than 40€ to 90€ within a day, which strengthens the assumption.

But why would he risk the "quality" of codehook? Well, leagues hardly use UAC for any big competetive game except for CoD4. A game which is competetively currently at a similar state like ET in 2010/11, to make it short: Not dead but strongly decimated. Due to that there are hardly any players left who purchase cheats for CoD4 and play the game competively. Plus the majority of former CODEHOOK customers is either banned and due to that don't use the same email any longer, or just simply don't simply play CoD4 anymore. Most of the other games they code for aren't played competetively at all or just in a really small environment.

At the current state of CODEHOOK there is only a customer login, so most of you'll be like "yeah, these were for sure customers". Yeah, I kinda agree on that, BUT: Codehook hasn't always been like that, it used to be similar to adawolfa/netcoders who have got an forum. In these forums there were often discussions about fps gaining configs etc, which could be a reason for non-cheaters to register.

All in all I would say this whole assumption is about 60-70% legit, which is quite critical considering it is an anticheat leagues seem to put trust in. This could explain the 3 recent UAC bans regarding ET players (zabija, hostill, rezta).

I'm very critical towards UAC myself, but I ask you to look forward about the happenings within the next few weeks and then make your decision whether to use it or not.

Have a nice day!