mortar removed? who decided it?
•
24 Jul 2006, 09:35
•
Journals
In a quakecon forum thread Nellie says:
This is just a bad joke, right? I think so because the "overwhelming support" thing clearly is. I think the result of this poll http://xfire.fragland.net/?x=poll&mode=item&id=311 is that 51% of the voters were in favor of keeping the mortar, then some time later this poll http://xfire.fragland.net/?x=poll&mode=item&id=335 resulted in a 54% in favor of mortar removal. Of course the crossfire guys can keep making polls on this subject until they obtain the result they desire, and then say that previous polls are no longer valid - and then stop making polls, and they will be able to say that the overwhelming majority of crossfire readers are in favor of mortar removal. But this just has not yet happened, unless you call 54% an overwhelming majority. And what about mg and flamer? Who decided that?
This is just a bad joke, right? I think so because the "overwhelming support" thing clearly is. I think the result of this poll http://xfire.fragland.net/?x=poll&mode=item&id=311 is that 51% of the voters were in favor of keeping the mortar, then some time later this poll http://xfire.fragland.net/?x=poll&mode=item&id=335 resulted in a 54% in favor of mortar removal. Of course the crossfire guys can keep making polls on this subject until they obtain the result they desire, and then say that previous polls are no longer valid - and then stop making polls, and they will be able to say that the overwhelming majority of crossfire readers are in favor of mortar removal. But this just has not yet happened, unless you call 54% an overwhelming majority. And what about mg and flamer? Who decided that?
0
