CIC7 ET Seeding Cup Small Changes
•
26 Jan 2010, 22:02
•
News
After the initial information was posted, a couple community members contacted us about slight details that could be improved.
The matches have been rescheduled to give the teams the chance to build up their performance. That's why we moved the most important matches to the back of the groupstage, while keeping the less important matches at the start.
If a group would have 4 teams A, B, C, D ordered from top seed to low seed, the match schedule looked like this:
- Week 1: AB & CD
- Week 2: AC & BD
- Week 3: AD & BC
- Week 1: AC & BD
- Week 2: AD & BC
- Week 3: AB & CD[/b]
For groups with 5 teams we have 1 more match each week:
- Week 1: AC & BD & EA
- Week 2: AD & BC & EB
- Week 3: AB & CD & EC
- Week 4: ED
With this change we also had to change the maps, since the stable maps had to be kept for the last week to suit the AB matches. This is the new maplist per week:
- Week 1: Frostbite & Supply
- Week 2: Radar & Braundorf_b4
- Week 3: Supply & sw_Goldrush_te[/b]
- Week 4: Radar & Frostbite (only for groups with 5 teams)
Make sure you schedule your match (nobody has done so yet) and play before the end of the week!
Esl Seeding Cup Page
RIDICOULUS!!!!! why even pick those maps if you don't want good teams competing on them anyway? ....
it makes no sense at all tbh..
Its not about a map being "good" or "bad", but less or more "lotto". No matter what other maps you would take in, supply and goldrush are fucking stable maps and the best teams in the group get the preference in playing direct clash between them on these maps.
Teams arent equal, face it.
oh and i have just reread what you wrote there and i have to say you are even more wrong than i previously thought, since good teams ARE competing on them, against C and D (and E) teams.
Also, I dont rly think it's krosan who doesnt want it, but the teams themselves...
if a league picks maps it's not about the teams wanting to compete on them or not. but changing them so that some people get "preffered" maps is ridicoulus. then why did you make that mappool anyway? and didn't just tell the teams what maps to play depending on their teamname or lineup???? makes absolutetly no sense whatsoever
- a league is for teams and players, so yes, its exactly about teams.
- making maps fit the teams is not ridiculous - the grand final of champions league is being played on the best/greatest stadium possible.
- you rly dont get the situation with maps, do you? there are 3 solid maps in ET and other maps are just bad. no matter which you will choose, they will be worse than radar,gold,supply.
agree but it doesn't mean a team has the right to play on "preferred" maps because they are better! thats just discriminating and fucked up. "your mid seed play braun and frost." "your top seed you get radar and grush!" where is the sense in that?
yea compare an almost dead game (and yea it is face it.) to soccer champions league. like a cockroach becoming an elephant....
other maps are not bad but the general consens is that some people like it and others don't. compared to the three solid maps the spread between people liking and disliking it is way more balanced. but that doesn't make the maps worse it makes them less popular. playing supply for the exp(n!) time is more boring for me than playing bremen or delivery. just as an example.
currently it says it's too long before the original matchdate
now make the maplist better :) hint: remove braun