Has your clan committed to 5v5 or 6v6, or not
•
28 Oct 2006, 18:42
•
Polls
This poll intends to find out how many clans are playing what
|
20.0 %
(170 votes)
|
|
45.4 %
(385 votes)
|
|
34.6 %
(293 votes)
|
Edit: There should be more votes for 6v6 because most(*all :p) clans that are commited to 5v5 have an acc on xfire(More familiar with the scene) and want to play Lans/EC, the so called "skilled clans". And the "fun" clans obviously dont give a shit about Lans/EC + 90% of them do not have an acc on xfire and would obviously vote for 6v6 because 5v5 rubbish. Same goes for the last polls about this, 6v6 would have a lot more votes if you asked _everyone_ who plays ET in a clan. My guess is that the results would look like 10% 75% 15% , fo with this retarded 5v5 decision :/
[Enter random flame here] (Even though you know im right)
>:(
why fix somthing thats not broken? ET and 6v6s arnt broken.
Where was the time clans like idle and u96d were the ones who suggested what was good for ET. If ET were a democracy we would still be playing lvl4 fullholds on oasis.
http://www.crossfire.nu/?x=journal&mode=item&id=10958
Ye, 2 years ago, it was rly boring to defend the bank on grush for 20+ minutes and now, there are stupid maps that take 3-4 minutes to win... can you enjoy the game in only 3 minutes? Can you show your skill in 3 minutes? And you want to shorten these times to 2 minutes ... lol :X
I don't mind playing 5v5 (i don't mind the idea of 5 players), but I do mind the way it is being played - still 5 mines, still tons of spam etc... If 5v5 was really only about smg, I would go and play it... but now it's not different from 6v6 considering the gameplay and advantages for smg players... therefore it sucks and I won't play it because it gives me nothing more than 6v6 does (and yes, it takes one player out of the fun:D
more retarded explanations for 5on5 pls
56% 5on5
hmmm, 55% are not playing at lans, so who voted for 5on5 zomg looks like somebody rly likes this format :/
7on7 with all weapons (mortar, 4 soldiers) enabled ftw
and ok if "big eSports centers and sponzors" dont support 6on6 ET - fuck them, imo ET is strong enough, we dont need to beg for support or i am wrong?
1) ET is 6on6
2) if I or anyone want play 5on5 why not? Make cups 5on5 etc BUT pls no fucking restrictions and forcing clans...
5on5 NC IS BIG BIG BIG FAULT! :/
Even if ESL, WL and CB went 5on5 you're still 100% free to only play your 6on6.
this was the worst change so far, not because of gameplay but because community is split apart now.
We played 2 weeks 5on5, and we are like... oh noes. Its a smg action game, i mean, make a double kill and you passed that part of the map if you get some luck with spawns
burn in hell all those fuckers who forced us to play this sucking 5on5 format and splitted community in a half for nothing
sad to see people cant admit their mistakes
the poll does NOT include if the teams are forced to play 5on5 or if they want to play 5on5
i voted for "commited to 6on6" though CB will force us to train 5on5 too for OC. The situation is so rediculous, sry...
Its not a question of preferring to play a certain way, its a question of playing one or the other to prepare for the competitions that team has focused on playing in.
dont tell that to me, tell that the 5on5-favouring people. they will count the "both-players" additional to the "5on5-players" - thats what already happened in the past
1) To EVERYONE using the XP argument in relation to 5-v-5, STOP! NOW!
It was right to limit / eliminate XP, but being right about that doesn't make anyone right about anything else, it only makes them right about XP. The fact a sizeable section of the ET community were initially against removing XP doesn't mean the majority are wrong in this case, each fundamental change to ET should be decided on it's own merits.
2) Someone above noted that a large number of Clans who either don't post here or don't care about LANs etc. would probably favour 6-v-6. I'd agree with that, this poll can only ever be biased by the nature of the people who visit this site. Taken as a whole I suspect 6-v-6 is the favoured format for the VAST majority of ET players.
3) 5-v-5, 6-v-6 (7-v-7, 8-v-8, 4-v-4) these are all arbitrary limits, the game was _designed_ for 16-v-16 with full XP. 6-v-6 works with a config designed for it with 3 years worth of tweaking, 5-v-5 could be made to work as well as 6-v-6 without question, so NEITHER is BETTER than the other in that sense, they're exactly equivalent (as are 4-v-4 and 7-v-7 etc.)
4) To anyone feeling even the slightest sense of guilt that favouring 6-v-6 is somehow splitting the community, DON'T. 6-v-6 is the accepted de-facto format. The people proposing 5-v-5 are the ones splitting the community, not you.
5) I proposed 5-v-5 myself, over a year ago, and made many of the same arguments for it that have been used since, and if I was still playing ET I'd be very strongly in favour of moving to 5-v-5. However, I'm even more strongly in favour of playing the format the MAJORITY of ET players want, which in my opinion is undoubtedly 6-v-6.
Have a nice day :)