First of all I'd just like to mention this isn't a "column" against how much I hate ClanBase or how it should be burnt to the ground. In fact there are a lot of things CB is doing that are reminiscent of prior tournaments hosted. They have mice up for grabs for the top 3 places in ET EC this season, a considerable amount of coverage and what seems to be a decent admin structure; however that being said, I think the admin team needs a little "work".
As I'm sure a lot of people are aware of the recent match between Estonia and Poland in NC XIII where "nordaN" played map 1 of 3 as "TARVO" aka "Holz" thus intentionally trying to "deceive" the admins into thinking it was not him playing. However, terrible choice of a name to pick on the roster who hasn't even played ET in over a year which was probably easily spotted by CB NC's Head Admin Killerboy. Now, originally I wasn't even going to write this article because I really couldn't be bothered, however I received a few pm's from people who asked me to and after the attention it's gotten after the "incident".
Now, I'd like to flash back to Feb/09 where there were two matches scheduled to be played, one being Canada vs Hungary and USA vs Slovenia. Now I really didn't care much for rules against smurfing, I actually used to do it all the time in a lot of things, NA leagues, CB etc. and I know several other players who have done the same thing. Now, when Canada was scheduled to play against HUN we played the match with a smurf/ringer/merc "The_End" knowingly because our 6th player went to bed. Then after we won, Steve asked us if I wanted to play in their match because of a lack of players. I said sure cause I'd rather play than have them forfeit. So after all was said and done Killerboy tracked the ips and matched them to myself & the_end respectively. Now, there's always euros saying "they used guidspoofers", or "they shared etkeys". However this wasn't the case. I for one deleted my etkey, but I didn't replace it with another player's etkey and The_End didn't even bother trying to hide it.
Upon Killerboy finding this information, he snickered off to his little throne of power and used his ban stick to thwart 2 bans our way. Now myself & The_End both received bans for the same amount of time. Three months for "Freelancing (fake nicked)". This is also found here http://clanbase.ggl.com/humaninfo.php?hid=2503954&suspend=1. Now, we both got banned for doing the same thing, however I got Team Canada kicked out of NC because I was banned and was the captain. It only took Killerboy two weeks to ban the both of us, and we both knew it was coming after Nellie decided it would be best to stir up the pot and post something on crossfire before we were both CB banned. This is found here http://www.crossfire.nu/?x=news&mode=item&id=4343.
Two quotes I wanted to focus on from that article. Nellie posted "These revelations leave ClanBase in a sticky position as to their next move, with a minimum red card for both teams (i.e. forfeiting matches played with mercs) seeming a certainty." Now this did happen when Canada received a forfeit loss against HUN before being booted out. Now nordaN played with EE and they didn't receive a minimum red card for playing with mercs? Hmmm... okay I guess. The second thing was the quote from ClanBase at the bottom of the news post. Quote Clanbase: "Since the situation with both teams has been handled by our C&A division we are now taking the step of removing both teams from competition. After banning the 2 involved players Anim and TheEnd Canada will be removed due to the person involved being their teamleader. For team USA the request was made to remove them by Mistaken, the American team captain. While it is regrettable the fault is theirs alone. Playing for a nation that you do not belong to will be punished severely." Now can't this be applied to the situation of nordaN and Estonia? Or is it just because Killerboy has a secret hatred towards myself and the rest of the NA community.
The CB rules state:
7. Any attempt to mislead a referee or a supervisor will be handled according to ClanBase's Abuse policy.
8. Any player caught faking his nationality in order to play for another nation will be considered as misleading the Supervisors and receive a temporary ban from ClanBase.
So according to these rules, shouldn't have nordaN received a ban by now? Shouldn't this issue have been addressed? Shouldn't the match have been overturned instead of Estonia sitting in the NC Semi Finals?
Now if Killerboy can provide an explanation as to the differences between these two situations that would be great. However, he will not respond to me on irc, maybe he will after this? After contacting Homer about the incident, asking if nordaN would receive the same ban as me; he said "I don't know, I don't run NC".
If CB makes a policy and lays down rules to be followed and then they enforce them, they should be enforced across every match regardless of what year, what season or what league it is in played in - regardless of which player, or which match as well. My opinion is a bit biased because anyone can see the flaw in me getting banned for something for a total of 3 months meanwhile nordaN does the same thing and gets off the hook. However, that being said it comes back to reputation and upholding what your idea of fair is. Clanbase has been home to many seasons of ET competition, it's success is essentially a combination of the fact it provides free competition with a fairly organized challenge and response system and a few dedicated admins. The bottom line is though, if rules are going to be imposed one season for one league, why not another season for another league? If I smurf in one map against Estonia with team UK will I receive the same treatment as nordaN? A slap on the wrist and a chance to disconnect before I play both rounds and make the team suffer "consequences". Does this apply to bots as well? Are you allowed to smurf a cheater in for a round now as long as he doesn't play for the whole match and don't worry about receiving a ban? I think CB's lack of action in this case dictates how seriously they should be taken, which is not very seriously at all. However, I guess they are entitled to wave their ban stick whichever way they feel like it, or at least that's what it feels like.
I appreciate the work the CB admins do with providing a good competition environment for all who play in it. This appreciation stops at rule enforcement where time and time again CB seems to take the rules into their own discretion when enforcing how strongly they should be imposed. If you want to create a fair and unbiased atmosphere - ban the people who break the rules. Isn't that what they're there for in the first place?
As I'm sure a lot of people are aware of the recent match between Estonia and Poland in NC XIII where "nordaN" played map 1 of 3 as "TARVO" aka "Holz" thus intentionally trying to "deceive" the admins into thinking it was not him playing. However, terrible choice of a name to pick on the roster who hasn't even played ET in over a year which was probably easily spotted by CB NC's Head Admin Killerboy. Now, originally I wasn't even going to write this article because I really couldn't be bothered, however I received a few pm's from people who asked me to and after the attention it's gotten after the "incident".
Now, I'd like to flash back to Feb/09 where there were two matches scheduled to be played, one being Canada vs Hungary and USA vs Slovenia. Now I really didn't care much for rules against smurfing, I actually used to do it all the time in a lot of things, NA leagues, CB etc. and I know several other players who have done the same thing. Now, when Canada was scheduled to play against HUN we played the match with a smurf/ringer/merc "The_End" knowingly because our 6th player went to bed. Then after we won, Steve asked us if I wanted to play in their match because of a lack of players. I said sure cause I'd rather play than have them forfeit. So after all was said and done Killerboy tracked the ips and matched them to myself & the_end respectively. Now, there's always euros saying "they used guidspoofers", or "they shared etkeys". However this wasn't the case. I for one deleted my etkey, but I didn't replace it with another player's etkey and The_End didn't even bother trying to hide it.
Upon Killerboy finding this information, he snickered off to his little throne of power and used his ban stick to thwart 2 bans our way. Now myself & The_End both received bans for the same amount of time. Three months for "Freelancing (fake nicked)". This is also found here http://clanbase.ggl.com/humaninfo.php?hid=2503954&suspend=1. Now, we both got banned for doing the same thing, however I got Team Canada kicked out of NC because I was banned and was the captain. It only took Killerboy two weeks to ban the both of us, and we both knew it was coming after Nellie decided it would be best to stir up the pot and post something on crossfire before we were both CB banned. This is found here http://www.crossfire.nu/?x=news&mode=item&id=4343.
Two quotes I wanted to focus on from that article. Nellie posted "These revelations leave ClanBase in a sticky position as to their next move, with a minimum red card for both teams (i.e. forfeiting matches played with mercs) seeming a certainty." Now this did happen when Canada received a forfeit loss against HUN before being booted out. Now nordaN played with EE and they didn't receive a minimum red card for playing with mercs? Hmmm... okay I guess. The second thing was the quote from ClanBase at the bottom of the news post. Quote Clanbase: "Since the situation with both teams has been handled by our C&A division we are now taking the step of removing both teams from competition. After banning the 2 involved players Anim and TheEnd Canada will be removed due to the person involved being their teamleader. For team USA the request was made to remove them by Mistaken, the American team captain. While it is regrettable the fault is theirs alone. Playing for a nation that you do not belong to will be punished severely." Now can't this be applied to the situation of nordaN and Estonia? Or is it just because Killerboy has a secret hatred towards myself and the rest of the NA community.
The CB rules state:
7. Any attempt to mislead a referee or a supervisor will be handled according to ClanBase's Abuse policy.
8. Any player caught faking his nationality in order to play for another nation will be considered as misleading the Supervisors and receive a temporary ban from ClanBase.
So according to these rules, shouldn't have nordaN received a ban by now? Shouldn't this issue have been addressed? Shouldn't the match have been overturned instead of Estonia sitting in the NC Semi Finals?
Now if Killerboy can provide an explanation as to the differences between these two situations that would be great. However, he will not respond to me on irc, maybe he will after this? After contacting Homer about the incident, asking if nordaN would receive the same ban as me; he said "I don't know, I don't run NC".
If CB makes a policy and lays down rules to be followed and then they enforce them, they should be enforced across every match regardless of what year, what season or what league it is in played in - regardless of which player, or which match as well. My opinion is a bit biased because anyone can see the flaw in me getting banned for something for a total of 3 months meanwhile nordaN does the same thing and gets off the hook. However, that being said it comes back to reputation and upholding what your idea of fair is. Clanbase has been home to many seasons of ET competition, it's success is essentially a combination of the fact it provides free competition with a fairly organized challenge and response system and a few dedicated admins. The bottom line is though, if rules are going to be imposed one season for one league, why not another season for another league? If I smurf in one map against Estonia with team UK will I receive the same treatment as nordaN? A slap on the wrist and a chance to disconnect before I play both rounds and make the team suffer "consequences". Does this apply to bots as well? Are you allowed to smurf a cheater in for a round now as long as he doesn't play for the whole match and don't worry about receiving a ban? I think CB's lack of action in this case dictates how seriously they should be taken, which is not very seriously at all. However, I guess they are entitled to wave their ban stick whichever way they feel like it, or at least that's what it feels like.
I appreciate the work the CB admins do with providing a good competition environment for all who play in it. This appreciation stops at rule enforcement where time and time again CB seems to take the rules into their own discretion when enforcing how strongly they should be imposed. If you want to create a fair and unbiased atmosphere - ban the people who break the rules. Isn't that what they're there for in the first place?
[01:44:04] <FiF|Jere> YOU KICKBAN ME BUT DONT KICKBAN NORDAN
[01:44:08] <FiF|Jere> thats enough
Nothing personal against nordan or team ee tho.
RAAAAAAAAAAAPED.
Yes i know, breaking the rules isn´t the same as murder. But people seem to be bitching about it like it was.
In before "lol you´re biased". Hell yes i am.
Poland had one player with tray tools for set picmip under the CFG limit and on CB rules were write that every exteral program that could give an advantage is banned. but ofc admins gave victory to poland anyway
now i know that et is not qw but it's just an example about how cb works: if you're friend of an admin, you will get everything
Firstly, stop crying. It's quite childish for you who got banned to complain when someone else didn't get the same ban.
Secondly, if the CB admin team needs a little "work", then why not help out yourself? You're forgetting that people like Killerboy spent hundreds - if not thousands of hours fighting against cheaters and abuse. I trust his judgement, even if it's not always 100% non-biased. If it wasn't for him, the scene would now be infested by cheaters and scumbags.
Edit: You're not insulting KB or the CB staff so that's certainly a good point.
Sure Animal comes across a touch whiney but there is an interesting point to be debated.
So my opinion is this: If what he says is true, then bans should be equal. However, cut KB some slack, he's doing the best he can.
Estonia tried to fool the "system" and in a competition like NC which is still respected they should get the punishment they deserve.
I sometimes wonder though. Take this situation for example:
A star team which is fanboyd and loved by the entire community plays in the same cup as an ex-cheater infested team which is hated by all and actually sucks hard. Both teams break the same rule (which has the consequence of getting the team banned for the season). Now you need to take into account two things:
1) The league will suffer from the loss of the best and most loved team, making the entire exposure of the league a joke. Having a lowbob final is completely pernicious for the league, as it will be labelled "lowest league ever", and will lose credibility on the long run.
2) Banning only the hated team (who didn't have a slight chance to even get near the finals) and not the top notch loved team will be frowned upon, making the league lose credibility in applying the rules, making it a corrupt league.
So for the first scenario, the league keeps its integrity, but loses general interest, resulting in a very bad outcome.
For the second scenario, the league keeps its general interest, but loses its integrity, resulting in a still quite popular, but biased outcome.
Choosing between these two scenarios is always a very hard choice. Is giving out biased bans a matter of morality? Or isn't it that important, can we apply rules relatively?
I still go for the hard stick-to-the-rules idea, but this matter is subject to debate.
Not applying the rules will give a signal to the community that u can get away with such stuff, and people will use this match as a precedent to get away with similar situations.
For NC to remain its "top" competition reputation, Estonia need to be kicked out of the competition (since it clearly stated like this in the rules) and then a eventual ban for their player(s) depending on how killerboy judges the situation.
The people have the power, sad thing is that the people are generally stupid and immature :-(
For Anim, you got fucked but there's nothing you can do about it, stop beeing an ass.
And your words are 100% correct, its always been like that in CB, atleast yout got the point :)
but yeah, thats pretty fucking stupid. So basically any supervisor can do whatever the fuck he wants regardless of the rules.
Hello ClanBase, Bye Integrity.
Supervisors do not have the right to bend rules as they want, especially not important ones as these.
And like you can see this is the column section, its purpose is to get some active debate, which I am doing, so no harm in that I assume.
Krosan was saying better not to kick Estonia cuz otherwise you'd have a bad NC final.
I was saying that the other 3 teams (uk/fin/pl) were also capable of making a good final.
Thanks m8, was just telling it how it is.
and on topic, integrity > *
If you lose integrity as a league, might as well stop doing shit at all.
CB admins are supposed to be trustworthy and seeing this case, they're obviously not cause they make exceptions for people they like.
Dont give me this bullshit "KillerBoy has other things to do, he already did a lot for CB".
He knows what happened, he knows who did what, shit's been written all over Crossfire in the past week(s), he just fails to act to it.
Comparing that to EE's lineup this NC where against poland their lineup was : subbi, mant, freeze, sinnu and nordaN (before they got reload or whoever to take his place). Mant also had a pbban in 09 if you check his C&A profile on CB. Again, I realize your post was an example, but just because a team has been reputable in the past or it used to be a "fanboyd and loved" nation, doesn't necessarily mean it still is today.
A perfect example of your second example is when they banned Iceland for cheats. They weren't liked too much to begin with so removing them was probably an easy option, however this situation with nordaN and EE comes right down to the rules. CB clearly laid them out and dealt with a situation prior. Not that this is a good comparison, but in trial cases a lot of judges look at precedents before making their decision. Did Kboy even consider the precedent he made about a year ago?
In Anim's case, however, the facts are all laid out clearly. Sure, the cases may differ somewhat, but ClanBase (if they wish to be taken seriously) should stand by the rules they have made. These rules are rather tight and quite strict (I quote: "Playing for a nation that you do not belong to will be punished severely") but that's the way they've made them.
Both cases are instances of somebody playing for a nation they don't belong to. The offenders received drastically different punishments. Personally, I have nothing against KB/Clanbase and the final decision is not really important to me; however, an explanation from staff in regards to such a controversial issue would be wonderful.
lol
your so fucking awesome, i hope you know that
Since 2 they for sure broke 2 rules:
Merc faking nickname
and
playing for a nations team where he doesnt belong in.
Imo rule with the iron fist at least that is what i would do if i was head admin of the C&A part of CB.
poles arent whining?? rest of the fucking commiunity is whining bout it? so how bout u use ur lil brains and start to think bout it?
WHAT ? So, let's tell now that clans can play in NationsCup if opponent agrees..
Was a nice way to see u approaching it too anim instead of the usual ah cb is shit etc etc. Actually got ur view across well and i can see exactly where your coming from. I would have done the same myself if i was you.
Also me agreeing with anim saying they should have been removed from nc has nothing to do with our game vs EE. I am just stating the rules should be followed.
But as I see it, .EE were not fair about it, they didn't announce the use of a non-allowed player (it is NATIONScup making the merc worse than in EC) and that way "cheated" poland to have a free choice before the game. Poland may say what they want, but in the end .EE tried to fool poland & clanbase and failed at it.
2. Praxis is the alternative, in case there is no written law. The court has a look at cases from the past and it draws its conclusions from that. Praxis isn't applied in all countries, but at least in EU it is.
Now there are clear rules on CB, so why not apply them? And even if there were no rules on "smurfing", there in fact is a praxis. The case which anim mentioned fits perfectly.
Internet is of course no territorial region but isn't it reasonable to demand certain professionality from the cb-admins. In fact they are comparable to a judge.
Clanbase has a good "rules list". Therefore I find it very strange that admins have done such a mistake.
On the other hand we have Killerboy who thinks its all good, cause he wants to be cool with nordan.
I'd say first get together and try to understand the rules, so you're on the same page being admins for the same league, cause its looking retarded now.
Second I'd say, Clanbase is a fucking joke. Integrity is what a professional gaming league should be all about, if you cant deliver integrity towards the participants of the league, it means the players cant trust on your judgement cause it changes constantly.
How do you run a league that players cant rely on?
but hey...I've yet to see Killerboy's response to this, cause I cant wait to see how he's gonna try and save his ass from this shit.
Fucking win.
they used an outsider in a nationscup, they violated the very thing the cup is based on - there is nothing to debate tbh, they should be punished accordingly
nothing against the EE's who obviously deserve at least a top3 position this NC but they simply broke the rules, can't do much here
Just let me remind you - Estonia won previous NC final mainly because they took the same map in the two recent matches in a row (semi- and final) - delivery. It's against the rules of course. Wrobel knew about it but he didn't want to complain but where were the admins?
Now we see that rules aren't the same for everyone again. It's obvious that Estonia should loose by forfeit, also Nordan and Estonia's captain should receive bans. One thing is really interesting why Killerboy was making the decision @ server when he's not even cup supervisor? Not to mention that Anaconda - cup supervisor was @ server, zlol.
Rules are rules.
It's quite obvious that Killerboy was affraid of kicking out Estonia, "man it's home of idle and Night, we can't just kick them". But if you don't know that rules are the same for everyone then what the hell you're doing there as an admin?!
Also I really have to admit, I loughed my ass of reading Krosan's comments. Man if you really want to divide people to those who are above the law and those who're not then go back to middle ages, buhaha. And you're admin anywhere? Hah, good joke.
and radar was the decider in the finals so again they couldn't pick it?
edit : and yes we didn't even pick radar in the semi final or any previous rounds
You took delivery in semi vs Croatia and in final vs Poland.
missing fact about Homer, who did NOTHING to solve this problem.
Have I insult you in my comment? No? So beware of your words. I bet that you didnt talk with KB. You even wrote news on Et.owned that Team-PL had been betrayed.
I wonder why you didnt read this column. This discuss is about last match between POL vs EE, when played with nordan :D So it looks that YOU failed very hard haha :DD
Reason:
Quote
We do not tolerate insults adressed to other users when they merely express their opinion.
Your currently have a total of 10 points, when you reach 100 you will be banned. The length of the ban is determined by how many warnings you have received; e.g. If you got banned on your 5th warning then your account will be disabled for 10 days.
Don't let me see you do it again.
And btw: http://www.crossfire.nu/?x=column&mode=item&id=512#comment26291
if you don't have players, just say so, wildcard or ask to use sub, but don't fake
for me it says enough about estonian players who played that game.. sad
So anyway, the day came and problems started, Estonia were going to give a forfeit win to Poland since they didn't have a team, none of Poland 's players were on the irc channel and Anaconda couldn't contact them, and was going to give a double noshow, so I asked him if both teams can play the day after because it is really bad for the spectators and the admins that dedicate their free hours to the cup and then teams get a double forfeit and no match is played, but luckily at 20:12 Anaconda told me "everybody is on server". I am not an NC Supervisor, Anaconda was reffing the match and to be honest I only joined the server as to spec the match on the matchserver instead of the ETTV server. I think I am one of the few referee's left that actually check guids, no offense to other refs, but some other refs today just do it for the lulz, being a ref is not easy and many people understimate how powerful a referee is and how difficult it can be to call decisions (same goes for Referees in football). So 1 minute into the match start I had checked the guids, and 1 ETPro GUID didn't match with Sweden's Lineup, so I asked Anaconda in the teamcheat who Tarvo was and he didn't know either, when i cross-referenced the GUID with yawn it said it was nordaN's guid, but knowing the current state of how reliable guids are I didn't want to stop the match in the first round of the match and state that Tarvo = nordaN and then the reality would be that an Estonian is actually 'sharing' the etpro guid with him (not intentionally) and I become the laughing stock of the match. So i asked Anaconda to give me the ref password because "this match is over", he asked why and I told him Tarvo is probably nordan, he aswell stated that we don't use etpro guids and that we cannot be 100% sure and I should only forfeit the match if I get his IP, and since I couldn't get it because I do not have access to the server logs of people who pay from their own money to provide GTV servers, I had to either wait until the End of the match and give a forfeit win to Poland , imagine the whine on CF and personal abuse on IRC it would have created for not reacting before but after the match, or somehow try to prove it, so after the map finished, i put the PB config on but nordan's pbguid was listed as (?) which meant his pnkbstrA/B processes were off which is quite common since everyone disables those processes to disable PB from scanning your pc. After a lot of ppl got kicked for not having PB on, Tarvo disconnected and I said "ye disconnect..." to try and see if Estonia react, when they asked wtf was happening i told them "tarvo = nordan" and they were like "LOL really?", "didn't even notice his voice is different" so in my mind i already thought "wow, seems like i failed?"
So considering the information and evidence i had, which was minimal and time which was a bit knowing i need to please 2 teams and 500 spectators, i decided the fairest thing would be to tell Estonia to get a real 5th and that they lose that map by forfeit. When RELOAd entered the match, iirc frEeze asked if it's 2-0 for Estonia and Anaconda corrected him and said "2-0 for pol tba", wiesiek requested if they want to rematch the whole match (aka play goldrush from the beginning) but dialer disagreed with him and wanted the 2-0 (forfeit) win for that map, which was totally understandable, and the match continued without any problems Poland only needed to win another map now, I thought that my "fair" in-game decision was quite a fair one because no team whined on the server and in my mind i thought, well wiesiek even wanted to rematch and the whole team agreed to continue playing, I think teams as much as admins want the spectators to be happy and Poland agreed to play adlernest followed by supply without any problem and they have my respect for being such a fair and respectable team in-game, too bad they lost, something which to be honest i was not expecting, I bet my money on Poland on gamestv and I have more friends in the polish lineup than in Estonia and bought a beer for dialer at lan, so don't say that I wanted Estonia to win. :P
Some days before and after the match as you might have noticed I have refrained from posting or interacting myself on Crossfire since I have my A/I Level exams and I didn't want to spend too much time, I had to repeat a whole year because i didn't pass last year and didn't want the same thing to happen again, everyone has his real life and this time i have decided it's fair enough for me to spend more time on studies rather than ET for this month. So I wasn't able to respond on Crossfire or discuss it on IRC or state the reason or what happened during the game. I read all the debates in this column and they are almost all valid points, there are many things which can be discussed and i will mention a few, obviously there are many biased people here and anti-CB haters that don't have any idea about the rules, yes it is true the rules are outdated and we should technically still be using PB and GV Streaming for every CB related match, I have decided to be more leniant towards teams as I noticed that prior seasons and a few months ago, teams boycotted CB for applying the rules and flamed them to death for doing so (example Romania boycotted NC for obeying the wildcard rule), and it appeared to me that instead of giving out cards or forfeits for every rule that is broken, i'd rather talk to the teams when they break a rule, example not showing up on irc channel 1 hour before, putting CB Nicks on IRC and in-game, correct guids, etc.
Canda/USA case: Yes, last season after reading Nellie's post and chatting to him about it on IRC I believed every word he said about them sharing pbguids and nickfaking, this was the main reason I banned anim and End for, and because instead of excusing themselves anim did act like it didn't mean anything, "it's something normal to do" "euros take it seriously" "dramafire" etc, but I mainly banned them because i thought they shared pbguids and tried to decieve the referee, but apparently the ref didn't check the guids ("shock") and i trusted what nellie said. After their was a poll yet again there was mixed flame against CB and NC Admins for obeying the rules, so this time I decided that this 3month ban is rather different, he played one map, he didn't share his pbguid/spoof an etpro guid to decieve it from the referee (I only know now that anim/End didn't do this either) and i honestly believe that this 3 month ban is pretty pointless and that is why nordaN isn't banned yet, it's also because i don't have the server log of the server (i need an IP Match to get him banned), instead i was thinking about disallowing him from playing next NC, because this 3 month ban doesn't disallow him from playing in NationsCup, and the act he did was in NC, if a player elbows a player in a WorldCup match, let's say it is his final match of the season, should he get a 3 month ban from that match after, or would it make better sense to ban him for some time or the whole WorldCup season in the future? This is obviously debatable and I know it isn't the best comparism. We also shouldn't allow teams such as Canada/Japan/Chile/USA etc to play NationsCup, because it is for european teams, yet we decided season by season to make it as fair as possible ping wise for every team and it pissed me/us a bit after the 'smurfing' case like that, it was like a direct spit in the face after letting you play.
Did Estonia deserve the win? I think there is no doubt Estonia deserved the win, they beat Poland fair and square with their lineup + backups (which were all allowed). Did they deserve a forfeit win? Probably, but given the evidence i had and trying to make the fairest and most careful decision on the server that is what i came up with. Does it make sense to change a decision a referee (also a game supervisor) made on the server? I honestly am not sure myself, FIFA couldn't change the scoreline and let Ireland rematch or passthrough the next stage for Henry's handball which decieved the referee, the ref took his decision and nobody could overturn that after the match, eventhough both france and ireland wanted to rematch or let ireland pass through. Ofcourse this is debatable, and whenever we have changed a decision after making make a rule, we have always been flamed for being a joke (such as for re-initiating 2 teams from 3 during the last NC for breaking the 3 man rule). So it's not easy as you think and it's hard to please spectators, and I think that teams should be given priority in this case first and hence the decision that was taken. I don't mind if you go tell the Chiefs, but I think we all agree there shouldn't be another NationsCup yet again, because i believed that NC should be for fun (only a few teams pracc for it) and it is mostly for the "wow factor" of seing the top players play, nobody wants to see a team go to the final by forfeits/noshows (like last season) they want to see players fragging eachother to the finals.
Sorry for the longpost, i know i will still get flamed and i tried to explain the thoughest decision i had to do in-game, and note I'm not saying it is 100% the right one, that is open for debate, I don't mind you discussing it aslong as it stays clean. I don't get paid for hosting cups season after season, and I'm sure any admin who has hosted a NationsCup and Bartichello would agree with me that NC is the hardest cup to host.
Thanks.
edit. Whaaaat, everyone else had a flag, except me :(
:P
Who's to say he wouldn't have played the entire match if you hadn't turned on PB and basically forced him to quit? As for proof, I don't think either team-ee or nordan himself are exactly denying it that he/they did smurf a player. :P
I'd consider removing team-ee from NC (because they played with a ringer from a different nationality), and kicking nordan from the current competitions he's playing (to punish him after he's finished the current season of EC and whatever else he might be playing wouldn't really be a punishment at all, imo, like waiting for somebody make interest off of stolen money, before taking it back).
It's less clear what to do with nordan, because the previous case with anim/end had complications (you were misinformed that they had exchanged etkeys, or were spoofing them), but I think that the case for removing team-ee –the NC captain & team knowingly playing with a foreign ringer– is much clearer. I don't think PL's decision to let the match continue, after they were informed, should come into play.
This might be good fodder for a poll.
I do appreciate you taking the time to write out your position in detail (yes, I read it all, and it helped me understand where you're coming from), and thank you for all the work you do to keep ET going. :)
P.S. Yes, I'm probably biased because I'm Canadian. :P
Keep up your good work.
:D related quote:
[18:22] anim`: [CB]Bartichello, I'm sorry for any inconvinience I've caused, I'm not going to ask for any mercy or pity, I just want you to realize that you've done your job as admin and stuck to the rules
dont really know what to say to this part, the event itself was bad enough but bullshit to cover it :\
That first rule is a fucking joke, CB has been accepting AND promoting countries outside of EUROPE to play in NC for a reason. What is that reason? Simply better competition. There have always been exceptions to top teams, does that make it right? If you think so, that's a joke - I know it's an old example but when u5 (LOL TOP AMERICAN TEAM) played in a playoff match with incorrect GUIDS and they forfeitted, no if's and's and buts. IF you can't follow the rules, you don't deserve to play in the competition. Yea I got banned for not following them, but you guys did the exact SAME thing this season. Having the elitist ideology that the top teams are untouchable and exempt from the rules is absurd. Just because a match may not have the "top players" in it, I think you forget that without all the players playing this game YOU wouldn't even have prizes to receive from this game. You should be thankful this game has lasted so long as it is probably the only one you'll ever excel in as well as you do.
Don't get me wrong, I really don't mind you as a person, but this post is so egotistical it's not even funny.
*important
moron.
I see you likes to manipulate comments, therefore I put a manipulate in your manipulate, now I will see when you tries to manipulate again mate.
and well it has already took enough long for the final to be played..... hopefully vs will be played tomorrow without a need of scheduling it -,-
Keep up your good work ClanBase. Soon you will be new PifPaf League (polish people know what I mean). And you act suprised when people doesn't bother to keep dates etc.
Eesti players - don't take me wrong. You would have won anyway but what you did is just not cool and you should be at least kicked from NC.
"written by animal"
and then i was like lol, no human, no read, bibuy :P
Fairness in my ass, there has to be some bendable rules since the it is already so hard to get a good game and keep the competitions smooth. But only when everyone PLAYING agrees to them.
btw krein wrote smth upper
edit: just read his comments, I stand corrected :-)
kboy heeft ze gewoon genegeerd op alles da ze zeiden XD
Who of you is playing CB (Ladder, OC, EC, even NC)?
If you have played 100 matches (what quite a few ppl here have on their list), how many matches have "gone wrong" due to Clanbase "mistakes" or rules or smth like that?
If you shedule your matches, talk to your opponents and dont use disallowed players (hi NordaN), i'm pretty sure it cant be above 1!
You blame clanbase for making wrong deccisions. What would you do in that case? And, state yourself the question: Would ppl be happy with your deccision?
the only thing that matters is whether u observe the rules while making them
Enforcing the rules based on personal biases seems to be an unwritten CB rule itself...
[ ] punish EE and nordan right now.
[ ] punish nordan
[ ] punish EE
[ ] let it be
punish will be: remove them from NC (actual and in the next one)
Ok first of all it aint the fault of the whole Clanbase community if theres an mistake done by an Cup-Supervisor, most of the people doesnt know that theres such things as "Chief of Cups and CO-Chief of Cups" one of those is "Chainzz".
If u really feel like theres an wrong decision made by an Supervisor then ull need to contact the Chiefs by e-mail, or at IRC. I personally had to do this last year one time with OC when there were this fricking moron Goldorak as an OC Cup-supervisor giving an permission to our opponent to play with mercs after I did check those quids from players and did notice there is 2 mercs and 1 player aint even at the allowed player's list.
Anyways Goldorak did ask from Killerboy about my whine about those players and the answer copy pasted by Goldorak is kinda word to word: "Ignore the abuse and force them to play!"<---- Seriously what the fuck is that!
I thought that Killerboy has learnt about his mistakes and makes his job better but doing such decision like this last one here with team.EE and nordaN is *******.
I really know how much work it is to be an Supervisor at the CB, trust me I know, I'm former CB CS:S OC/EC head Cup-supervisor and yes its a' lot of work to do.
As far as I know and things were when I were an Supervisor almost every other game was going with the correct schedule times and correct decision by Supervisors because other ones ASK'S from their fricking Chief if they dont know what to do.
Im having an feeling that if for exam. Chainzz thinks about these decisions made by Killerboy earlier he would replace the team.EE with team.UK at Final against my loved homeland Finland.
_____________
FLAME ON!
Rules are written to be applied , not to be tweaked in favor to certain situations. You may not like us Killerboy but that's not a reason to be biased.
That being said I think you've helped the community alot and I'd like to thank you for letting us play in the NC. About the ping fairness though it wasn't always right (see the Japan / Slovenia case).
You probably acted on the emotions when you banned canada from last NC because anim was being annoying. He can be a dick when he wants(I have had true conversations with him and we both screamed and insulted each other :P) but that shouldn't have been
a reason. Admins . just like judges , refs , shouldnt be biased , their role is to be fair and apply the rulebook.
It might be easier to ban a "lowbob team" just like Canada/Iceland/USA and harder to ban good teams like EE , PL , BE. Some guys stated the fact that you are a friend of many EE players. I'm not sure if it's true but once again it shouldn't have been a factor.
If you banned Anim , TheEnd and Canada, then why wouldn't you ban Estonia AND nordan?
Thank you for answering this.
EDIT: Sorry for my flaws in english , my first language is french.
Now could you please explain to me why arent Nordan and team Estonia banned while in the same situation both the players and the team(s) involved were banned??