ahaha this is even more ridicilous. i mean ribery has fouled him. tho he didnt really want it. and three matches are a way too much for a foul which wasnt a assault
germany should nominate him after losing ballack. no frings, bad hitzlsperger, and injured rolfes.. only german playing an awesome season on this position besides schweinsteiger is boateng, too bad he joined up with ghana.
Understandable that Bayern tried to appeal, but they didn't stand a chance. Everyone knows the red card was deserved so the penalty is always at least 2 games.
Btw, the red card for Fletcher was deserved too.
well im a referee myself and giving cards is more than just judging the heaviness of the foul. since it was 0-0, not excessive tough, the foul wasnt on purpose and ribery wasnt apparent before a yellow one would have been decent.
the fletcher scene wasn't a foul but could have be seen as one (noone is perfect) but NEVER been judged with a red card!
No offense dude, but you seriously should consider another hobby.
One of your jobs as a referee is protecting the player's health. Ribery clearly didn't have any intention of playing the ball, he simply was frustrated.
And for the Fletcher situation: it was an obvious foul, he clearly tripped the Arsenal player robbing him of a chance to score a goal. There's no other option than giving him a red card and Arsenal a penalty.
PLS u can't be that stupid and say ribery fouled on purpose!? watch the scene again untill you are absolutely sure. safety is a thing of intention yeah, but he hadn't any intention to foul him. (btw the player from lyon blocked him. you could say the same here. could be a yellow one easily for him)
the fletcher thing COULD be seen as a foul yeah, as i said. but he first played the ball and you can't judge his chances for a goal after that, SO a red card just isn't possible. this is no opinion or no reason to get another hobby for me, this are simple rules ;)
e: you see the problem referees mostly have. each fan talks about decisions and so on but doesn't know the basic rules.pure irony that the majority of the fans are right this time
The Ribery foul is definitely one out of frustration. I watched the entire match, 5 minutes before that Ribery already almost snapped when a player from Lyon cleared the ball to a corner. Ribery already hesitated to give him a kick.
As for the red card foul: he didn't try to play the ball, he simply went for the player. Even most people from Bayern admitted that it was the right decision. The appeal was simply to try to get him into the final, not because they doubted the decision of the referee.
Fletcher might have touched the ball with his shoelace, but only a splitsecond before he tripped the Arsenal player. You don't have to be a genius to see that the Arsenal player had a free passage to the goal. Of course it doesn't mean that he would've scored for sure, but a scoring chance hardly gets more clear than this one.
In both situations the referee was absolutely correct. If you think otherwise, you still have a long way to go becoming a real referee.
sollen sie ihn doch sperren, aber höchstens für ein spiel und das wäre ja leider das finale. trotzdem besser als gleich 3 spiele für eine tätlichkeit die keine war sondern ein "grobes" foulspiel.
FIFA is like worlds most fucked up company (they are nothing else!).
I saw players getting 2-3 games for fouls which were much worse than the one from ribery
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0nE4bDl4V8#t=6m00s
second best turk on eart u :-*
best turk on earth are u :*
and not related to this, but kevin boateng should also get some punishment for the foul on ballack.. ffs
but would rather like to see frings playing, though Im not believing into that one..
Maybe Ribéry did mistake in his life but that's not a reason to prohibit him to play.
I don't follow football np :p
Btw, the red card for Fletcher was deserved too.
the fletcher scene wasn't a foul but could have be seen as one (noone is perfect) but NEVER been judged with a red card!
One of your jobs as a referee is protecting the player's health. Ribery clearly didn't have any intention of playing the ball, he simply was frustrated.
And for the Fletcher situation: it was an obvious foul, he clearly tripped the Arsenal player robbing him of a chance to score a goal. There's no other option than giving him a red card and Arsenal a penalty.
the fletcher thing COULD be seen as a foul yeah, as i said. but he first played the ball and you can't judge his chances for a goal after that, SO a red card just isn't possible. this is no opinion or no reason to get another hobby for me, this are simple rules ;)
e: you see the problem referees mostly have. each fan talks about decisions and so on but doesn't know the basic rules.pure irony that the majority of the fans are right this time
As for the red card foul: he didn't try to play the ball, he simply went for the player. Even most people from Bayern admitted that it was the right decision. The appeal was simply to try to get him into the final, not because they doubted the decision of the referee.
Fletcher might have touched the ball with his shoelace, but only a splitsecond before he tripped the Arsenal player. You don't have to be a genius to see that the Arsenal player had a free passage to the goal. Of course it doesn't mean that he would've scored for sure, but a scoring chance hardly gets more clear than this one.
In both situations the referee was absolutely correct. If you think otherwise, you still have a long way to go becoming a real referee.
christian was sags du denn zu unserem quasimodo ?
what a small fag
I saw players getting 2-3 games for fouls which were much worse than the one from ribery