Meanwhile in Isreal
•
1 Jun 2010, 09:45
•
Journals
Islam will destroy Israel after latest attack from Isreals side?
Or will the Jews hit AEF lan to crash, and stay in belgium.
Only time can tell
Or will the Jews hit AEF lan to crash, and stay in belgium.
Only time can tell
plus as much as everyone hates israel nobody has an army which could take them on especially when israel has nukes
the turk's were close to going to war but never did
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvS9PXZ3RWM
haha pathetic, now we get called lairs
europe is simply pathetic
may the indoctrination be with you brave soldier :-p
but the sad thing is, europe is even more blind in not seeing how these retards in the ship made use of the peace rights to deliver weapons through boats to gaza
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYjkLUcbJWo&feature=player_embedded
enjoy the truth, really...
2 problems solved with 1 solution -> world peace -> profit !
We would all profit from world peace is what I was trying to say :)
- Ship on international waters
- gets attacked
- ship defends
- attacker opens fire and kills bunch of people
- attacker escorts ship to harbor and imprisons the crew
how is having any guns abroad even relevant at this point?
UN Security Council statement
UN text on Israel convoy raid
(well i think you can call it war, so some rules to not apply, imo
cutting off supply lines to your enemy is probably not exactly a crude thing to do in war, it it's imo more or less a case of "you come any closer and I'll bite you" - *take a step closer* - "OMG - he bid me, did you see it?" to put it simple)
(hmmm this is hard to find a fitting example, but i think you get the picture of my view :P)
you are one brainwashed one of them
lolzzz
now a serious comment for a change, that's one fucking brainwashed comment, sorry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6jDIQr59Sk&feature=related
- israel contacted the boats and told them that the waters were hostile (contiguous zone) and that they would have to come to ashdod where they can search the boats. This becauseisrael recently(november) found a ship with over 5000 weapons which headed to gaza.
Also according to art 33 of the vienna convention law of the sea (...)In a zone to its territorial sea, described as the contiguous zone, the coastal state may exercise the control necessary to:
a. prevent infrigement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations within its territory or territorial sea;
b. (...)
2. The contiguous zone may not extend beyong 24 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured.;'
- when the israeli soldiers tried to go on deck of the ship they were attacked with knifes, iron poles and other light firearms.
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IHb8VeV46M&feature=related and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvS9PXZ3RWM- is this humanitarian help?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3L7OV414Kk (palestinian source) nice people on board.
btw we planted lots of weapons found in the ship
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvS9PXZ3RWM
All ive read is that the ship was at international waters and by that alone all the other actions should be nullified.
Its more easy to understand Israeli's position when the ship refused to check in, though you also have to remember that Israel only allows 15,000 tons of food yearly(?) which is not enough, this might have been one of the main reasons why the ship wanted to go straight to destination.
The ship had small amount of cold weapons and about 700 people. maybe not even enough to cover the crew's "selfdefence needs". It should be logical that a ship has self defence mechanism, though I understand israeli's position in bringing weapons.
The video at the end is pure propaganda, similiar to ones showed after 9/11 about muslim people dancing in joy.
im trying to base all of it on logic and facts, which leaves the ship's true intentions unknown.
all in all while having better understanding of the situation, if Israel attacked on international waters (as it has been spread by media) the fault is theirs.
If the whole or part of the population of an occupied territory is inadequately supplied, the Occupying Power shall agree to relief schemes on behalf of the said population, and shall facilitate them by all the means at its disposal.
Such schemes, which may be undertaken either by States or by impartial humanitarian organizations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, shall consist, in particular, of the provision of consignments of foodstuffs, medical supplies and clothing.
All Contracting Parties shall permit the free passage of these consignments and shall guarantee their protection.
A Power granting free passage to consignments on their way to territory occupied by an adverse Party to the conflict shall, however, have the right to search the consignments, to regulate their passage according to prescribed times and routes, and to be reasonably satisfied through the Protecting Power that these consignments are to be used for the relief of the needy population and are not to be used for the benefit of the Occupying Power.
Furthermore I do understand why the ships had small weaponry, but I can't understand why they call themselves humanitarians than. A synonym of humanitarian is "vredelievend" which means the same as peaceloving and clearly those people whom attacked israeli soldiers were absolutely not.
our national breakfast nigger
SPPPEAKKKKKKKK SSSSEERIIIOUUUSLLLYYYYYYYYY
BBBBRRRRRAINNPPPPPAIIIINNNNNNNN
army vs army
Also, can't believe noone has noticed the blatant typo in the journal title.
later generations, who were born there however had less conflict because they were born in said cultures/countries, and they started to call themselves german/turks etc...
which is a normal thing because when you move somewhere you have to adopt. in 2-3 generations turks got somewhat assimilated, within 2-3 more most of them will be totally assimilated, which again is a normal process
jews lived in many different countries in europe for ages, and one by one they got kicked out of them, until they had their own state: israel in late 40s.
living in many different countries for hundreds of years, one cant help but wonder how they fought against being assimilated: they kept their big family together, didnt marry non-jews ..etc
what would happen if someone would say I'd not marry a nigger, or an asian, or whatever ethic group? he would be marked as racist.
world believes jews had been victims of racism yet history shows they are the masters of it.