Soccer in USA
•
19 Jun 2010, 01:00
•
Journals
One of the reasons I like posting here is I like to think I'm getting a unique variety of perspectives from all across Europe. World Cup soccer has a way of drawing interesting angles out of people from around the world because of it's unique blend of international team sport competition. The World Cup has been very interesting from an American standpoint this year because not only do we have a somewhat competitive team but the sport itself is also rapidly gaining popularity. They actually televise several Serie A club games every week, and they are showing at least one World Cup match per day on ESPN in addition to all games being shown live online by ESPN free of charge. This is an unprecedented amount of soccer coverage, at least three times that which existed for the last World Cup. There has also been a change in the average American's attitude towards the game. I live above a bar, which was full last night on account of game 7 of the NBA finals (which was a huge rival game that was expected to be one of the most watched NBA games of all time). An hour or so after the game, in the wee hours of the morning, I heard something funny from outside my headset, I thought maybe it was a fight. I took my headset off and lo and behold, the whole bar was chanting U-S-A trying to get pumped for the 9:30 AM kickoff. The average sports fan is now a soccer fan, whereas it was a fringe game much like lacrosse during the last World Cup. I myself, who had played the game in organized leagues for a good chunk of my childhood, didn't care much for watching it until a few months ago during qualifying. The game is too slow to those who don't appreciate the intracacies of a game. Then I saw this today on ESPN.com:
Let me break down what each of those options means:
- Stephen Strasburg is a pitcher who has caught a hot streak and was National League player of the week last week. He's a huge baseball story right now. Baseball is the most popular sport in America being played at the moment.
- Manny Ramirez is the most popular player on the team in America's second biggest sports market (LA), who won a World Series playing for Boston, who plays in Fenway Park.
- Mets vs. Yankees: the two New York City baseball teams, it's rare that the Mets are good (which they are now) and the Yankees are the best team in baseball, not to mention the most popular sports team in America.
- U.S. Open: Americans love golf, although watching golf is only usually slightly more popular than watching soccer.
So that leaves us with the World Cup. I have several guesses as to why soccer is catching on, I enjoy it because it's more athletic than baseball and there is more parity at the club and international level than any other sport except for maybe hockey. This new found popularity is likely to have several ramifications on international football. Obviously, it starts with money. Americans love spending money on professional sports, and sponsors write big checks to clubs. MLS, which is our professional league that you may have heard of via David Beckham, is going to have a lot of money to draw top players in. At first, this will likely only affect the importing of talent to the US. However, in a decade or so we may begin to see the US exporting massive amounts of top level talent. The reason we don't see great US footballers (although several US players have been reasonably successful at the club level) is not because the US is incapable of producing athletes capable of playing soccer, it is the simple fact that most of our top athletes aren't aware that soccer has earning potential like NFL football or NBA basketball when they start training. With soccer being out in the open now and the MLS picking up sponsors and national spotlight, it's only a matter of time until the US makes a legit international superstar, and the soccer "trade" goes fully international. Some may be resistant, but I think it's quite a beautiful thing to think that we may soon have a truly international sport and that the World Cup has only begun to realize its potential.
P.S. I don't know why I wrote this but I'm bored... I'm an English student who has an interest in sports journalism so sometimes it's nice to work on my craft.
Let me break down what each of those options means:
- Stephen Strasburg is a pitcher who has caught a hot streak and was National League player of the week last week. He's a huge baseball story right now. Baseball is the most popular sport in America being played at the moment.
- Manny Ramirez is the most popular player on the team in America's second biggest sports market (LA), who won a World Series playing for Boston, who plays in Fenway Park.
- Mets vs. Yankees: the two New York City baseball teams, it's rare that the Mets are good (which they are now) and the Yankees are the best team in baseball, not to mention the most popular sports team in America.
- U.S. Open: Americans love golf, although watching golf is only usually slightly more popular than watching soccer.
So that leaves us with the World Cup. I have several guesses as to why soccer is catching on, I enjoy it because it's more athletic than baseball and there is more parity at the club and international level than any other sport except for maybe hockey. This new found popularity is likely to have several ramifications on international football. Obviously, it starts with money. Americans love spending money on professional sports, and sponsors write big checks to clubs. MLS, which is our professional league that you may have heard of via David Beckham, is going to have a lot of money to draw top players in. At first, this will likely only affect the importing of talent to the US. However, in a decade or so we may begin to see the US exporting massive amounts of top level talent. The reason we don't see great US footballers (although several US players have been reasonably successful at the club level) is not because the US is incapable of producing athletes capable of playing soccer, it is the simple fact that most of our top athletes aren't aware that soccer has earning potential like NFL football or NBA basketball when they start training. With soccer being out in the open now and the MLS picking up sponsors and national spotlight, it's only a matter of time until the US makes a legit international superstar, and the soccer "trade" goes fully international. Some may be resistant, but I think it's quite a beautiful thing to think that we may soon have a truly international sport and that the World Cup has only begun to realize its potential.
P.S. I don't know why I wrote this but I'm bored... I'm an English student who has an interest in sports journalism so sometimes it's nice to work on my craft.
Americans sound like retards when they call association football "football" since the game we call football (gridiron/American) is by far the most popular sport in our country, whereas soccer is behind football, baseball, basketball, auto racing, and hockey in popularity. Both games were developed separately on different continents after American independence, therefore both games have equal right to the name "football," but gridiron football was being played before association football in America so we call the former "football" and the latter "soccer" to avoid confusion. Ask an Australian what it's like to have the two most popular sports in the country called football.
(: nevertheless, your arguments are valid.
But that just shows that you should rather say 'football' when talking to Europeans, instead of 'soccer'. Just like a European which is asking how to get to a subway, not an underground, when in America :).
And auto racing?
;-)
so maybe you get a nice chance of winning the wc in like 10-15 years :D
ps: You can call it soccer in usa but when you speak to the rest of the world please call it football xD... nice read
also really nice to read, number1dad.
couldnt really concentrate on reading that much now, but sure will, since the first part looked nice. go ahead and keep us up to date ;D
whats the correct term for that shape? in german its called "Rotationsellipsoid"
so, hand-rotated-ellspsoid? :O
Ostrich's egg
(well mine fails at the curves...now it's up to you to find the combination of those two :P)
found this in the help section of some math software ive used
notice how they actually use an "american football" as an example? ;)
But nice that football gains some popularity over there tbh. :)
But explain me why such a boring sport like Baseball is so popular in the US, please. I will never ever understand it. :/ As far as I know there isn't even a salary cap so the same teams (especially yankees) are winning again and again the MLB title anyway?! Same about Golf, boring as hell.
A big minus of the us sports is the franchise system in my opinion. There is no real local identiy with the franchise like in europe, which has been developed for many, many years. It's like a capitalistic travelling circus. There is more money to earn? So we move to another town!
Furthermore there is no relegation/promotion because of it. Not the sportive results decide about the membership of the biggest sport leagues, it's the money.
Edit: What about the viewer levels compared to the nba finals and the superbowl in %? It has more validity than a poll on a website imo.
Had to download the SuperBowl though, adverts are fucking retarded.
Rugby over here is rather enjoyable, but Starcraft > spectator sport wise.
106 million viewers for the 2010 Super Bowl, which was watched by more people than any other show in history
While there are some teams that are transient, there are plenty of programs with deep traditions. For instance, the Steelers, Cowboys, Packers, Bears, Browns, Yankees, Cubs, Red Sox, Reds, Red Wings, Bruins, Knicks, Celtics, and Lakers all have been in their cities since the 1920's or before and have notoriously loyal supporters and rich history within their cities. Fan loyalty is greatest at the collegiate level, some rivalries run as deep as any English football rivalries, for instance Ohio State vs. Michigan stems from a war the two states had over the city of Toledo, OH in the 1830's. Ohio State has the 5th most wins all time of all college football programs, Michigan is the winningest program in college football history. They both play in stadiums that seat over 100,000 people and were built in the 1920's. The big difference between American sporting culture and international football culture is that Americans don't have hooligans that go to games with the intent of hurting somebody, although rioting is a common occurrence with popular college football teams.
And American football is my favorite sport and I follow just about every major sport out there except for cricket (the games are too long). It's a very beautiful game, it takes a lot of thought and your execution has to be perfect on every play. Plus all the contact and the athleticism is insane.
Steelers: founded in the 1930s
Cowboys: founded 1960
Packers: fair enough
Bears: started in Ohio but admittedly moved very early
Browns: 1946 and also Baltimore Ravens
Yankees: founded in Baltimore, than bought and moved to Manhattan, later Bronx
Cubs: fair enough
Red Sox: founded in Ohio, later moved to Boston
Reds: fair enough
Red Wings: fair enough
Bruins: fair enough
Knicks: 1946
Celtics: 1946
Not bad. I guess it was not even broadcasted at the prime time due to the time difference?
And, yes, the majority of Americans won't care about football after the US gets knocked out until the next World Cup rolls along, but there is a significant number that will follow MLS, BPL, Serie A, and all the international events.
Furthermore it's very strange to see the crowd leaving the arena before the match ends when the winner seems to be clear. Even if the own team is winning. Not even a lap by the home team after the match to say thank u for the support or to celebrate with the crowd in case of a win or a good performance. Just as the match is over the players leave the field instantly.
To put it in a nutshell it seems to be more about the event than the sport by itself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvLKszZAx4Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MybMzWrvTko
Texas A&M has practices for their chants at midnight before playing big games:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEfVWw-IlVM
Here's a decent list of traditions in college football, a lot of these are over 100 years old.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/278974-the-25-greatest-college-football-traditions
Really, college football is where it's at in America.
Steven Cherundolo is the best btw ;)
And finally some action from football supporters, can't be challenged by any US sports 'fans', imo ;) There are other examples ofc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jz8a-cQdPtU
Ne schicke Schützenschnur?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0tgAhtKZm4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dT72mnFTwzA
Screw the Super Bowl half time show!
last president "el gordo hijo de recontra de mil p.." Aguilar was the worst thing that could ever happen to a football club in the world history.
we sold great players to Europe for a couple of millons but he made such a great work by letting the club get red numbers with debts, players leaving without getting payed, its sad to see my team like this.
Now River need to make a good year and at least earn 55 points in total otherwise we could be facing to play in the 2d league of Argentina; La "B" Nacional.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPq526ULPXM
Notice the street light being torn down in the background
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ies9wtGaakA&feature=related
Aftermath after an Ohio State football game... when I lived in Columbus (where the uni is) I remember 4 people dying in riots after beating Notre Dame by a lot.
Of course, there are other examples. I'm not saying US college football fans are more intense than European football fans but I think they deserve some respect for being devoted fans.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkwG0PUiuXs
This the EC08 like 100k (I thought) Dutchies were in Bern to support our team (without having tickets).
not meant to sound sarcastic but many americans i reckon would have thought this was very obvious for everyone on here because american things are very important !:O
cheers
In my opinion one of the problems for North American football, for many years, is that they see football a bit as athletics, in the sense that people should be able to run fast, jump high, etcetera; the players haven't had the feel for football also, the "je ne sais quoi".
The club I follow had a player (Jeremiah White) for 3 years, not a regular USA national team player, but he played once in a while. He was the fastest player in the Danish league and did the farthest throw-ins, but his technique wasn't always the best.
This is however changing and I think that in some years USA might win the World Cup.
USA dont play with any other south american team like many Mexican teams with La Copa Toyota Libertadores or La Copa Nissan Sudamericana (major competiont in the region) thats why mexico improved a lot, mixing their teams with south americans teams is a plus.
I doubt USA might win a WC in some years, maybe in a couple of decades, just maybe..
peace im out, im sleeping now! :|