Need more comments

by aztec • 27 Jun 2010, 20:23 • Journals
of english ppl ragin bout second goal for england

we won 4-1 not 2-1


U just mad cuz we were stylin on you
Comments
24
▼
Nub 27 Jun 2010, 21:25
shut up and go have some fish and chips
▼
OoFragger 27 Jun 2010, 21:27
i wonder how unfair can football be :D
england was better imo, but its hard to play with retarded referee
▼
aztec 27 Jun 2010, 21:28
WAT :DDDDDD
Parent
▼
AnnieMac 27 Jun 2010, 21:30
yeah, england was better ^^
Parent
▼
Deactivated7001 27 Jun 2010, 21:33
1) It was a clear goal.
2) The 2-2 could have changed the course of the game.
3)
Quoteengland was better imo

That's the most ignorant comment ever written on crossfire.
Parent
▼
OoFragger 27 Jun 2010, 21:36
ok thanks i will add it in my profile
Parent
▼
k1kzzzzz 27 Jun 2010, 21:36
epic :D
Parent
▼
aztec 27 Jun 2010, 21:38
kuhler typ wa :D
Parent
▼
k1kzzzzz 27 Jun 2010, 21:39
war in hannover public viewing
Parent
▼
aztec 27 Jun 2010, 21:40
lol du fischkopf wär ich auch gekomm, warst am stadion?
Parent
▼
k1kzzzzz 27 Jun 2010, 21:42
jau
Parent
▼
aztec 27 Jun 2010, 21:44
image: lolwat

Lol wat :=D
Parent
▼
OoFragger 27 Jun 2010, 22:10
well it should be 4:3 or 3:2 cuz some goals were controversial
score doesnt mean that it was completely one sided
and pls stop laughing at my post :D
Parent
▼
kazzam 27 Jun 2010, 21:33
possible
but germany was dominating more
▼
luuurtz 27 Jun 2010, 21:36
mostly likely
▼
Deactivated7001 27 Jun 2010, 21:49
Possible, but it's very very doubtful. England was only dangerous by long-range shots and setpieces, unlike Germany. Even when the score was 0:0.

The wrong decision between Argentina and Mexico was much more significant.
Back to top