offside goal
•
11 Jul 2010, 22:28
•
Journals
If you use a proxy, it indeed does look like an offside goal for some reason, while when using a non-IP, it doesn't look offside, this is an optical illusion.
|
35.2 %
(19 votes)
|
|
64.8 %
(35 votes)
|
STUPID NERD, LEARN FOOTBALL, IF A PLAYER IS NOT IN PLAY, THERE IS NO WAY HE CAN BE OFFSIDE, STUPID DUTCH NERDS, YOU ARE EVEN MORE STUPIDER THAN USAFAGS WHO ARE NEW TO FOOTBLAL
STUPID NERD, LEARN FOOTBALL, IF A PLAYER IS NOT IN PLAY, THERE IS NO WAY HE CAN BE OFFSIDE, STUPID DUTCH NERDS, YOU ARE EVEN MORE STUPIDER THAN USAFAGS WHO ARE NEW TO FOOTBLAL
3th
...
@ first screen, he already shot the ball so it might look a bit offside, he was 100% not offside when he played the ball, and it still doesn't matter, cos he didn't challenge for it, was out of play.
He gives dutch players cards with no warning, spaniards get 3-4 or in Iniesta's case more warnings.
and from what I remember, there was some rule saying that people that ask for cards, should receive one? I've seen at least 5 people ask for cards multiple times during the game, for "fouls" where absolutely nothing happened...oh well.
said and done, we lost, our own fault, robben should've scored.
and yes, he failed to see that was red, but then again, the red card for heitinga was uncalled for.
So yet again, he failed.
Double standard much.
and besides, webb and the line's man completely missed the fact NL should've gotten a corner from Sneijder's free kick, the counter after that free kick led to the goal.
:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
play dirty, lose WC