Inception #22

by emdek1990 • 1 Aug 2010, 00:24 • Journals
Already watched, sat down for 30 minutes thinking and i already understood it 100%. I started laughing to myself how fucking goood it is. Im not a fanboy but this is one of the best or the best film ever made. EVERYONE WHO say its terrible just fucking didnt understand it.
Comments
44
▼
Skir 1 Aug 2010, 01:25
im not understanding this
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 01:29
It's a really good movie and enjoyable, but still annoy me why level3 has gravity.
▼
envyy 1 Aug 2010, 01:31
fucking moron, its fully explained why. what u dont understand?
Parent
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 01:33
Explaination is bullshit. Maybe its good for a kid like you.
There are three type of movie-goers; dumb people, intelligent people and dumb people who like feel as though they're intelligent. This movie is aimed at the latter group (and it turns out there is an awful lot of them).
Dumb people who like to feel as though they're intelligent are easy to spot. They confuse "complicated" with "complex", "contrived" with "multi-layered", "pretentious" with "thought-provoking" and "vague" with "open to interpretation". Their dumbness prevents them from articulating their arguments, so they have invented a multi-purpose four-word response which they fire off at any and all criticism they may encounter; "You don't get it".
Parent
▼
envyy 1 Aug 2010, 01:36
:DD very weird that everyone fully understands it, but not u?
Parent
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 01:37
The director wanted you to think you get it, and you think you are so smart now.

By the way I dont remember when I talked to a 16 years old teenager last time in real life, probably 6 years ago.
Parent
▼
envyy 1 Aug 2010, 01:53
so u telling me this guy who worked on the movie since he was 16 spent all those years to develope a movie which had sequences that didnt make sense`? to make dumb ppl think theire smart? Isnt it you who tries to be speciall? u got a strong belife that your "out side thebox"? :)

Ye man u so kool cause u was born before me :)) i mean wtf? :XD
Parent
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 01:56
No, probably they just couldnt solve the situation (imageine level3 without gravity) and they left this as it is and everybody eat it now. Every movie has some mistake but this is a huge for me.

Dont care how old are somebody as long as he dont behave like his age.
Parent
▼
envyy 1 Aug 2010, 02:02
no need to keep argumenting with u as your brain is so sure about your right that u simply dont listen to anything else ;)
Parent
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 02:03
What? You said nothing against my argument. Look down there is a better discussion, you may join.
Parent
▼
envyy 1 Aug 2010, 02:04
yes i did in your last journal ;=
Parent
▼
plekter 1 Aug 2010, 11:24
He is right. Level 1, free fall, i.e. no normal force being exercised on body. No gravity in level 2 follows. However, no normal force is being exercised there either, so why the gravity in level 3?
Parent
▼
Baggiez 1 Aug 2010, 01:32
You replied to my explaination yesterday but when I tried to read your reply, the journal had been deleted.

What did you say?
Parent
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 01:34
level 1 they ar in car they are falling = 'feeling' of zero gravity so falling = zero gravity
level 2 in the hotel they have zero gravity thats same as falling then same "feeling".

You said they are 'still', ye they are still in both situation
Parent
▼
Baggiez 1 Aug 2010, 01:42
They're not 'still' in the same situation. In the car, there is gravity. In the hotel there isn't.
Parent
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 01:43
In freefall you have zero gravity feeling. Why does it matter you have gravity or not? Only the effect on your body should count, and it's a weak explanation for me.
Parent
▼
loctarar 1 Aug 2010, 01:46
Freefall = imponderability.
Level 1 generates imponderability to level 2.
Level 2 should also generate imponderability to level 3.
Parent
▼
evan 1 Aug 2010, 03:06
I think a better example to back up your argument would be the van rolling over the bridge having no effect in the third dream level; technically, it is inconsistent since the van hitting the bridge caused an avalanche etc., etc..
Parent
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 04:00
Really forced, dont you think ? There is no good explanation for this imo.
Parent
▼
Nemesis- 1 Aug 2010, 05:05
what did you reply to me yesterday on my explanation about dependency on the last layer only? Because you can see that in the final layer with Fischer talking to Dad, that there is also normal gravity there.
Parent
▼
Juize 1 Aug 2010, 03:22
someone is active around here all of a sudden :o
Parent
▼
plekter 1 Aug 2010, 11:22
Yep.. And why the fuck does the brain move 20x faster when you dream inside a dream? It's still the same brain :(
Parent
▼
syriusz 1 Aug 2010, 01:34
any steam/dl link?
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 01:35
only shitty cam yet
Parent
▼
emdek1990 1 Aug 2010, 01:38
and the fucking fischer believed that he need to go his own way in the end. Jesus christ how the fuck its possible to write such a screenplay
▼
Deuger 1 Aug 2010, 01:40
enjoyable but way too long
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 01:41
All the good movies r long, this movie wouldnt be this good with if its shorter.

Edit: Actually I think it should be even longer because the end was too fast for me.
Probably there will be a Inception 2 anyway...
Parent
▼
Deuger 1 Aug 2010, 01:50
yeah it should be a 38 hour long movie about 742 different levels
Parent
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 01:50
You should be a cop?! :p
Parent
▼
Nemesis- 1 Aug 2010, 02:39
ellen page can't do that many exponents in her head
Parent
▼
Deuger 1 Aug 2010, 02:47
might be true. but she is fucking hot
Parent
▼
Nemesis- 1 Aug 2010, 03:11
I agree man, but she's like... idk, mysteriously hot :P Kinda hard to explain, but I think you know what I mean :P
Parent
▼
Panda 1 Aug 2010, 01:42
Was an awesome movie, I'm sure I missed something out (like most films) but will go back to watch it in the cinema soon, purely because I enjoyed it and there's nothing much else out at the moment worth seeing... :)
▼
emdek1990 1 Aug 2010, 01:43
i think i understood 99% and im in fucking shock lol, i was completely focused from the beginning to the end and there is absolutely no plot holes .
Parent
▼
Nemesis- 1 Aug 2010, 02:38
absolutely phenomenal movie. idk, it felt like a more elegant and improved version of Donnie Darko (in that both challenge the concept of our world and "reality" being the one and only)
▼
fragma 1 Aug 2010, 02:58
I fucking loved that film. First time i've been the cinemas in a while and it was really nice. Tom Hardy gave a great performance and I found his character really interesting
▼
SpeaKeR 1 Aug 2010, 03:29
I personally came away with the feeling that parts of the film felt rushed, yet it also felt like it went on too long. It seemed that they had to cram this 'love story understand me please hey girl i just met i will tell you everything about me' shit in somewhere.

The ending was extremely poor. The first thing you learn in english (literature), is to never end a story in "it was all a dream". Yes the film didn't expressly do that, it just took one stap back: "It wasn't a dream! but it might have been! see what we did there kiddos, we're really smart with that one! run along and chat to your 14 year old mates about how amazing we are!".

It wasn't bad, but it was far from great.
▼
Nonix 1 Aug 2010, 04:02
+1 for that
Parent
▼
Nemesis- 1 Aug 2010, 04:03
the whole movie was built on the concept of dreams though, so while I think the ending may have been a bit expected, it was quite apropos and fitting to the whole theme.
Parent
▼
kot 1 Aug 2010, 04:13
it's so overrated
▼
solomon 1 Aug 2010, 08:26
Went to see it last night and although it was quite good I was left feeling completely underwhelmed

I didn't come away thinking that there was anything new in the film.

The effects were good etc but it just didn't surprise me or give me anything I'm going to remember in a years time. If it was as amazing as people are saying I should have come away with at least one 'wow' moment and there wasn't anything like that

It's not bad, it's not that great.
▼
mini 1 Aug 2010, 11:06
GET HIGH AND WATCH THE MOVIE :DDDDDDDddddDDDD
▼
beAsty 1 Aug 2010, 12:01
only shit quality avi for download :(
Back to top