aef conclusion?

by creaji • 1 Aug 2010, 15:59 • Journals
dignitas won a lan (again-.-).
xylos still the best riffle and imo player of the lan.
BF surprised in a positive way, they performed pretty well this lan.
jinosta failing at lan??
kamz acting nice irl, but everyone is waiting for him to troll again.
no one gives a shit about my journal.
edit: Undead is one of the best BE players, very underrated. (undead new maus)
no clue why d. should be so dominating. ( imo impact had a chance to win the first final since their attacks were nice, only their defences just sucked)
theres still enough topplayers to keep ET alive
hayaa underrated player

the lan place seems really cool, the inside and outside! The schedule seems fine and in time, grats Krosan!
edit = comments below
Comments
44
▼
Loekino 1 Aug 2010, 17:00
dignitas ::)
▼
pedro 1 Aug 2010, 17:01
I give a shit. :'(
▼
creaji 1 Aug 2010, 17:03
nice troll, even i dont give a shit :' (
Parent
▼
pedro 1 Aug 2010, 17:06
It wasn't actually a troll, I was being genuine. :-/

BF for team of the tournament from what I've heard so far!
Parent
▼
Henk 1 Aug 2010, 17:01
seems about right
▼
kiwi 1 Aug 2010, 17:02
did jinosta failed?
▼
Sample 1 Aug 2010, 17:02
pretty much this
▼
ag0n 1 Aug 2010, 17:03
Jinoasta just proved himself!!! (as a hacker)
I heard the EC Kamz played shit aswell!
Undead is one of the best BE players, very underrated.
Impact mix worked good as a team, Rockit mix played as a mix (what a mess their game were)
TeKoa luger was on fire...

edit: the lan place seems really cool, the inside and outside! The schedule seems fine and in time, grats Krosan! A success i would say!
▼
loazis 1 Aug 2010, 17:05
Don't agree about RockIT.

They only lost because they fucked their Frostbite defence up, they made a better impression on me than Impact overall.
Parent
▼
ag0n 1 Aug 2010, 17:07
Go watch impact vs rockit... they were completely lost inside the map, like newbs getting spawnraped! I don't really think they played as a team. Maybe i saw the wrong games? :|
Parent
▼
eVo 2 Aug 2010, 13:15
Impact mix? We practiced very fucking hard for this lan how is that a mix :S
Parent
▼
ag0n 2 Aug 2010, 14:02
It's not a mix, it's a 3 weeks old lineup!


oh the sarcasm. my point is: the lineup isn't playing together for that long.. so in my point of view they are still some kind of mix with a good base to become a successful clan...
Parent
▼
dEzIrE 1 Aug 2010, 17:06
jinosta should be insta banned, kamz is an idiot who thinks its fun to be an idiot on the internet.
undead new maus, xylos mvp
hayaa is NL's new beast
no clue why d. should be so dominating.
theres still enough topplayers to keep ET alive
▼
ag0n 1 Aug 2010, 17:08
hayaa played the same before at some other lan (cc7 or something?), he is kinda underrated. But he is a complete damage beast!
Parent
▼
dEzIrE 1 Aug 2010, 17:09
thats what i mean yes :]
Parent
▼
Cstm 1 Aug 2010, 22:21
whut happened with jinosta?
Parent
▼
fragma 1 Aug 2010, 17:06
shit lan
▼
Fizmo 1 Aug 2010, 17:12
1 decent team and the rest is shit
▼
rEZHnI 1 Aug 2010, 17:14
lol jinosta had the same playin style online. :=-SSSS
stop the whine lol.
kamz placed a bomb at AEF.
▼
ScaTmaN 1 Aug 2010, 17:16
Im the only one who think that aef-lan were better place for playing as on the cc lans? :X

All in all i liked it , only the GTv fuckups were shit! :X
▼
ag0n 1 Aug 2010, 17:46
I think the same too. CC's should move to AEF place!
Parent
▼
hannes-` 1 Aug 2010, 17:17
karnaj (whatever his nick is) way too bad for .d
squall was actually quite good
d. overall just dominating opponents...
impact was quite good
xylos mvp

piece of crap schedule / organization ?!?
▼
dEzIrE 1 Aug 2010, 17:25
ii dont know what games uve been watching but karnaj usually had the highest dmg, also dont think d. couldve won (in this dominating matter) the LAN if one of their players wudnt be good enough
Parent
▼
Techniker 1 Aug 2010, 18:12
"karnaj (whatever his nick is) way too bad for .d"

Surely not!
Parent
▼
Nub 1 Aug 2010, 17:18
didnt watch any of the games
▼
Rockskin 1 Aug 2010, 17:21
rockskin highste damage against SL+Rock.it
▼
znArk 1 Aug 2010, 17:22
about 500 i guess ^.^
Parent
▼
Rockskin 1 Aug 2010, 17:23
No ^_^ @ adler against rock.it + @radar against SL :D:D:DD this made my lan and now i can brag about it because the others aint back yet
Parent
▼
flushje 1 Aug 2010, 17:27
Jinosta was nervous only, it showed, he had exact same playing style and made some nice hs. He still outdamaged his team mates most of the time....
▼
Vivi 1 Aug 2010, 18:56
you again cheaterlover, my god, deal with it, we told you 10000 times about Jinosta.
Parent
▼
flushje 1 Aug 2010, 18:59
What are you talking about you greasy spic piece of shit?
Parent
▼
Vivi 1 Aug 2010, 19:01
Irish piece of shit im talking about the fact that you are always defending cheaters, busted players or supicious players.

Jinosta did shit at lan cause he is a fucking hacker that made 55 acc online and does shit without "help".
bb cheater lover.
Parent
▼
flushje 1 Aug 2010, 19:03
Give me one other example, please, just one. And dont say AnDy, he wasn't cheating, nor has he been busted, I watched demos over and over again. I'm not defending Jinosta, im stating fact.
Parent
▼
Vivi 1 Aug 2010, 19:05
another example: Znark, another example Andy yes (not busted cause there was no pb at that match kk but your team was forced to play with pb and admin said he was clearly hacking.. so pls.
Parent
▼
flushje 1 Aug 2010, 19:06
Are you actually fucking serious? All this shit about znark came out well after he played with us, so it irrelevant, Ive never defended znark once after the allegations were made. Get your facts right
Parent
▼
mamouth 1 Aug 2010, 18:21
Adeto played well
Back to top