Wich monitor

by Cardo • 1 Sep 2010, 18:28 • Journals
LG W2343T
image: 1249308699
23 inch
16:9
1920x1080 (Full HD 1080p)
2ms
Contrastverhouding (statisch) 1.000:1
Contrastverhouding (dynamisch) 30.000:1
Helderheid 300cd/m²

OR

Samsung Syncmaster P2270
image: 1237368963
22 inch
16:9
1920x1080 (Full HD 1080p)
2ms
Contrastverhouding (statisch) 1.000:1
Contrastverhouding (dynamisch) 50.000:1
Helderheid 250cd/m²
Comments
19
▼
Elly 1 Sep 2010, 19:29
Pay some extra money and buy a 120hz LCD
▼
zafoga 1 Sep 2010, 19:31
i would take 1 with a screen
▼
RazZaH 1 Sep 2010, 19:33
makes no difference these days...

both are fine

just pic the one which looks better and costs less
▼
Cardo 1 Sep 2010, 19:33
both are almost same price ;o
Parent
▼
stownd 1 Sep 2010, 19:33
samsung>lg anytime
▼
IcEcrusT 1 Sep 2010, 19:34
image: 77%20Huge%20Computer%20Monitor
▼
cl4ym4n 1 Sep 2010, 19:37
Dunno whats worse... the fact that you get eyecancer within less than 2 weeks or the fact that she is playing with the arrow keys and a trackball mouse.
Parent
▼
Anima 1 Sep 2010, 20:19
the fact that its a SHE is worse tbh
Parent
▼
stownd 1 Sep 2010, 19:38
nice monitor stand
Parent
▼
potty 1 Sep 2010, 19:34
I have the second one and I love it :)
▼
Loekino 1 Sep 2010, 19:35
vision master pro 451
▼
d227_speedy 1 Sep 2010, 19:36
obviously samsung
▼
Playaaa 1 Sep 2010, 19:41
i would go for a 23" the LG E2340T http://images.icecat.biz/img/norm/high/4011916-6342.jpg

5 ms
16:9
1.000:1
5000000:1
1920 x 1080 Full HD LED
Helderheid 250 cd/m²

and for a 22" the LG E2250V http://images.icecat.biz/img/norm/high/3951369-3565.jpg

2ms
16:9
1.000:1
5000000:1
1920 x 1080 Full HD LED
Helderheid 250 cd/m²
▼
biqq 1 Sep 2010, 20:00
that's so 2009, check out this LED technology everybody in 2010 is talking about.
▼
Quazz 1 Sep 2010, 20:59
+1 LED portrays colors more accurately and is therefore win
Parent
▼
cutee 1 Sep 2010, 20:19
XL2370 bitch!
▼
jnz 1 Sep 2010, 21:00
http://www.digitalversus.com/monitors-article-923.html

there is another site which is even better (forgot url) but this a proper one. Ignore everyone who isnt giving the whole picture on the monitor, there are a lot of things to conisder. Response rate is overrated also, imo its better to worry about viewing angles, colour accuracy etc than <=4ms reponse. Also remember that a response of say 10ms is different in the real world depending on which of the 3 LCD monitor types you have. I went for the samsung syncmaster that is the favourite on digitalversus and its great, one setback is reponse rate but you wont notice anything.
▼
Cardo 1 Sep 2010, 21:07
ey thnx man , i will check that site
Parent
Back to top