Idea for EC
•
2 Sep 2010, 10:58
•
Journals
I actually think that high stake games should be played in a best of 5 maps format so shit like this ec final doesn't happen. Lag can be crucial in a 2 game format making it not exactly fair lotto, 5 game format would reduce such non skill based factors by a decent margin since a team would have to win 3 matches to secure the win and winning 3 games instead of 2 in ET makes a big difference. Last match i have seen on ettv was impact vs dignitas were a total of 4 or 5 maps has been played making it a very exciting and unpredictable (unpredictable in terms of skill which is a good thing) match overall. This system has proven itself to be successful in other games take sc2 and ql for an example so i really don't see a problem with implementing it into prestige matches like EC and ESL finals.
Discuss.
Discuss.
but still too time consuming i guess ..
i swear i got anmilkshake
1 map is approximately 20-30 mins, meaning 5 maps would take 2-2.5 hours which sounds pretty fair.
Look at the NBA series.. they do 5 final matches just to make it more exciting and fair and its working perfectly!
Goldrush, supply, Bremen, radar & karsiah aren't lottomaps.
Where maps only take 10 minutes, and not 30 minutes like in ET.
sc2 finals have best of 7 format = 2h+ gametime
compare a team game to another team game :)
well it's not applicable to SC, but SC isn't a fps.
And honestly, ET games (i mean the actual playing time, not the bullshit before and warmups) are really too short.
Two Group Stages, then knockout!
Loser Bracket is only good for lans imo.
champions league -> ec
euroleague -> oc
you missed his point totally
This + spawntimes fix = <3