Best of 2010

For the people searching number one anti virus scanners:
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/v2/


Number one anti virus scanner:
http://www.bitdefender.com/
Comments
42
all antivirus that i use sees slac as a virus
Parent
time to get a real anti-virus from the link you gave us then
Parent
I said ALL you know

Or get a better anti cheat program What the fuck is slac?

YOU EVEN CAN'T SEE WHAT THE HACK IS

PB won't lag here but ur ass program will lag me as shit.
Parent
banga mad cos he cant cheat on slac

post more threads about how to stop slac from working please :D
Parent
Hey probeer eens, Microsoft security essentials
Parent
Als je virussen wilt moet je die gebruike of Northon.
Parent
avira antivir dected it as well but easy to say that should be allowed
Parent
Avast scans my SLAC as a virus as well, anyway to fix that? (I have to turn my virus scanner off to play ET, not the best solution I would like to play with)
Parent
you can add it to avast's exception list, so it scans anything except slac

http://forum.sl-anticheat.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=3&sid=051ae906ffbc5a63a425607506f44fcc

2nd post
Parent
Thanks Kill3RB0Y m8 :) You make my ET happy
Parent
its more like 14 av´s dedect the slac.exe as trojan/malware

http://www.virustotal.com/file-scan/report.html?id=abd51b9219e37f6fa8fe35033711351c2b46ffa9f9100b9a75ca05ed654625a5-1285582299

http://scanner2.novirusthanks.org/analysis/727381f7e7b5d8b9aec9c3e9e5a52e66/c2xhYy1leGU=/

http://virusscan.jotti.org/de/scanresult/ca81cac9b30d0cb081bd34766cd5cae9d4fcee4a

i somehow begin to trust it more since it looks more like false-positives :S
trojan: since its building a connection somewhere to.. and prpably sending/reciving data

besides that only the "crap" av´s seem to give warnings.. e.g. Avira has the highest false-positive dedection rate of all AV´s, followed by avast

on the other side only AV´s / FW´s with HIPS are reliable these days :P and sites like virustotal dont scan with HIPS
Parent
ESET NOD32 all the way.
A fast scanner but will slow your PC down.
Parent
Only if you have a retarded slow pc
Parent
You sure?

4x 3.6 GHz?
XFX RADEON 5770?
Parent
Hard to understand what you saying or writing.

If have problem with slac and antivirus programs then please use your brains like did 80% of the community. Its is easy to make exception in antivirus program or just dissable it when using slac.
No, just delete slac and work with PB.
Parent
why would anybody want to work with PB :D ?
Parent
obviously cos nobody uses PB and PB doesn't detect cheats lol
Parent
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 4sure its better then UR SLAC.
Parent
PB won't lag and slac does lag as shit

With pb you can see what the hacker is using.
With slac you can't only a list and maybe he has a wrong DLL file in his ET folder?
Like i had in 2007.
Parent
slac doesn't scan your pc, how about you shut the fuck up instead of spreading bullshit? if you like pb play on your own and leave slac alone
Parent
Slac no lag? ohh yeah thats PB when slac is on and my mouse wont move.

MX518 Cable.
Parent
First of all PB lags like crazy, it's totally non-playable. With slac I haven't really noticed any lags.
PB gives u just some random codes like "Multihack #1230912". That doesn't really say anything more about the hack.
Well, it wasn't slac that busted you in 2007 it was PB :) ?
Parent
idd, i'm saying at PB you can see what the hacker is using

With slac you see

User Cheater/blablabla
Parent
even if PB says multihack, it still doesn't tell anything about the hack :)
Parent
Look:
PB is better here then SLAC.

With slac i can't move my mouse it lags i have to restart that ass program 3 times


and i got no pb lag.
Parent
well to me it's totally the opposite :D
Parent
DO I LIVE LIKE A SLUT?
Parent
I guess u know it the best yourself
Parent
Probably the worst list I have ever seen
Norton before nod? Haha, nod is the second best, just before kaspersky. And avast beats the shit out of avg
Wouldn't trust this list at all
norton did some great improvements.. would rate it higher than nod after i have seen some new tests (reliable tests.. not such a shit like the link above).

kaspersky has a high dedection rate and is hard to kill.. but it slows down the system rly hard and also has some bugs with win7 x64

avast is good.. but avira is even better (it should be faster andh as a bit of higher dedection rate.. but not rly noticable :o)

i would even say NIS before KIS.

but after all this list is bullshit.. alot of good products are missing (Online Armor,Dr.Web,Comodo) aswell as free products
Parent
Just use microsoft security essentials and fix a proper hardware firewall.
Norton rated as an excellent anti-virus? Sounds like a pro list to me for sure.
where is comodo?
shit list

first of all only paid products..
second they tested it in a bullshit way

if u want to know which av to use, check av-comperaties.org or wildsecurity.com


online armor is one of the best firewall/av these days and its not even listed in that shit list :S
same for dr.web
same for comodo
where is my mcAfee :[
Back to top