SLAC mad.

by Oxy • 15 Oct 2010, 02:46 • Journals
image: 2u5gw40


Explain.


Edit: After being asked on IRC by 15 different people what the fuck this picture is supposed to be about; Compare amount and names of players from sl_players to players.

Edit2: Server in question was 62.212.67.194:27961 , in case it is of any relevance - though doubtful.
Comments
29
▼
Casillas 15 Oct 2010, 03:55
what should I see here?
▼
sAs1 15 Oct 2010, 04:04
no u mad nigguh
▼
Oxy 15 Oct 2010, 04:07
image: ximg
Parent
▼
sAs1 15 Oct 2010, 04:11
u more
Parent
▼
Oxy 15 Oct 2010, 04:12
:( why do you always have to belittle me
Parent
▼
Levin 15 Oct 2010, 04:12
the explanation is in the pic y.y
▼
Oxy 15 Oct 2010, 04:13
User was not on the server at any time, the server was empty to the time we connected and they never had a spectator either. Also as you can see, he's given player num 00 indicating that he was the first to join the server, thus the whole reconnect thing is void.

Also, not entirely sure to this point, but doesn't /players list everyone even if you're still in the connecting state?
Parent
▼
Levin 15 Oct 2010, 04:16
slac mad then!
Parent
▼
Oxy 15 Oct 2010, 04:16
slac mad.
Parent
▼
Levin 15 Oct 2010, 04:17
Btw I guess zmk was the gohst=
Parent
▼
FoaMeA 15 Oct 2010, 09:35
yes, me was a spy on the server. :D
Parent
▼
biggz 15 Oct 2010, 04:17
"=D" changed to "=d" on the /players list
and
decerto - zMk delivers is not even on the /players list

Neither of those two players have a SLAC GUID, therefore = linux users or not registered?

Does that server use the server add-on? If so, those two players have bypassed SLAC somehow (although i'm probably wrong about that).
▼
Oxy 15 Oct 2010, 04:19
/players doesn't capitalize names (see hermine)
And no, I can assure you =D is on windows he just didn't have slac running, and with that being said... the server obviously did not have the server side client either.
Parent
▼
slajdan 17 Oct 2010, 03:03
You should ask on irc or on his website, since he is BANNED here. BUT my guess is that either the client was on the server when the last statusupdate was sent OR the client crashed or lagged out resulting in the slac masterserver not getting any feedback from him and did not timeout him yet.
Parent
▼
vimm 15 Oct 2010, 04:20
Interesting..
▼
sandbag 15 Oct 2010, 05:16
slac bypass hack busted
▼
sani 15 Oct 2010, 08:35
post it on SLAC forums, maybe you get some answers then
▼
Taiki 15 Oct 2010, 09:09
Just play LoL :>
▼
AinsleyHarriot 15 Oct 2010, 09:56
Dikkertje dap! bijna vakantie =)
Parent
▼
Taiki 15 Oct 2010, 10:05
Ik moet hierna nog een week >.< , maarja zo naar lan in friesland xD
Parent
▼
AinsleyHarriot 15 Oct 2010, 10:20
Hah lekker :P, ff tot kwart voor 3 lijden, daarna naar me home :P
Parent
▼
FoaMeA 15 Oct 2010, 09:34
HAHAHAHA WTF ME ON THE SERVER WTF =))))))))))
zMk friend, I told you I'm gonna use that nickname! I kept my promise :))))))))))))))))))
▼
flR 15 Oct 2010, 11:33
zMk is cheating obviously
▼
rEZHnI 15 Oct 2010, 11:37
why u mad tho?
▼
Matjj 15 Oct 2010, 12:45
zMk.... suprising
▼
zentic 15 Oct 2010, 14:13
you mad?
▼
mAuxPete 15 Oct 2010, 15:19
Slac failing? Cant bi!
Back to top