it will happen again if the security standard won't be raised alot higher but the problem of some german reactors are that they are too old and reveal not enough safety to make them more safe
my guess would be that human nature is imperfect, so it will happen somewhen. higher standards of safety procedures can only decrease the chance, but it will never fall to complete zero.
You know that what you are showing on the picture is just steam? Nuclear waste comes in solid form which is a b*tch to get rid off but it does not pollute the sky in any way.
As I said - Air pollution is NOT the only form of pollution.
Burying waste which is harmful in small doses - lolZ tonZ not even needed lolZ - is a great way to solve a problem! Asse and Gorleben are such NICE examples for a clean way to get rid of it. Not to speak of the awesome secure Castor transports, most of the ppl involved in this shit the last decades are nearly as healthy as the rest...besides the much higher rate of cancer, ofc.
Being blindfolded about the HUGE disadvantages of nuclear power doesn't declare it as the best way to generate power. And obviously it doesn't neglect the advantages of energy sources with NO what-so-ever pollution or waste. The effiency of solar power plants has risen expentionally over the last years and can eventually create as high amounts of power as your fucking nuclear power if this trend keeps the same. So - where's ur point?
Oh - and btw..I don't think it's ANYTHING to cheer about when a government just erases the decisions another government of other parties has made. That's no way to do democracy, particularly if its just for the benefit of those oh-so ecologic power companies.
It's not like nuclear power is cool or anything like that you retard. The greens are generally right with this issue, but the problem is we lack effective and inexpensive alternatives for nuclear power at the moment.
oh you!
for you to know its the most safe energy :~>
you get my point, its most efficient and one of the safest :~>>>
do a search for "project for a better world"
they dont happen, but when they do...
dont take example from those dumbs chernobyle
doesn't mean we shouldnt use them :)
also: people don't seem to realize that nuclear energy is really clean actually, since it has no environmental influence like fossil fueled plants.
Also, the creation of nuclear energy is the cleanest in the whole world, yet, the toxic waste coming from it needs to be stored for 100+ years...
?
lolque
also, what air pollution?
also, what's some H+ or e- gunna do hundreds of meters down in the earth in a sealed salt mine
.cockesser
Burying waste which is harmful in small doses - lolZ tonZ not even needed lolZ - is a great way to solve a problem! Asse and Gorleben are such NICE examples for a clean way to get rid of it. Not to speak of the awesome secure Castor transports, most of the ppl involved in this shit the last decades are nearly as healthy as the rest...besides the much higher rate of cancer, ofc.
Being blindfolded about the HUGE disadvantages of nuclear power doesn't declare it as the best way to generate power. And obviously it doesn't neglect the advantages of energy sources with NO what-so-ever pollution or waste. The effiency of solar power plants has risen expentionally over the last years and can eventually create as high amounts of power as your fucking nuclear power if this trend keeps the same. So - where's ur point?
Oh - and btw..I don't think it's ANYTHING to cheer about when a government just erases the decisions another government of other parties has made. That's no way to do democracy, particularly if its just for the benefit of those oh-so ecologic power companies.