All you 5on5 haters
•
29 Oct 2010, 18:16
•
Journals
Sorry but Krosan is right. 5on5 saved ET because it's easier to organise LAN events. Without these events ET is nothing. All good players go to LANS. Don't forget that 5on5 means more teams overall, simple math.
Show some respect. Krosan has done really good job to keep ET alive and all you do is whine? You have no idea how much time he spend on AEF, no idea!
Show some respect. Krosan has done really good job to keep ET alive and all you do is whine? You have no idea how much time he spend on AEF, no idea!
5on5 = more team you said, so more cash for lan :)
"Without LANs there wouldn't be any serious top teams." - Disagree, purely speculation.
"No top teams = no serious competitions = no interest from anyone." - There is hardly any competition at the moment.
What top teams are there? Impact and Dignitas? People don't play 5on5 nowadays for anything other than fun, I really doubt the smaller teams are thinking "HEY LET'S PRAC HARD GO PRO AND BEAT THOSE TOP GUNS WHO WIN EVERYTHING", believe it or not that was the attitude of clans many years ago, nowadays it's more about having 5 people online on a wednesday evening with little to do.
Are dignitas and impact taking ET "seriously" simply because they prac 2-3 times a week? you think that's taking a game seriously? I think that's the bare minimum you should put in to be considered a "team" and not a mix.
Competitive ET at the highest level is dead and has been for a long time, no offence to the current clans they've got their reasons for still playing (No better games, LAN prize money but if that's honestly a teams reason for existence then they're doomed to fail, etc) but to say ET is competitive is certainly a lie.
u would have serious teams with cheats prolly
6on6 is still better though.
5on5 killed ET, that simple.
6o6 online
so simple.....