with my thumb it was good to push the side button the back one but it broke after 6 weeks :-/ And now I cant use the front one because too far and I have to lift my wrist to push that because i hold my mouse with my fingers not with my palm. Jeh this is the problem! because when i hold in my palm its easy to push that but uncomfortible for playing.
Most comfortible mouse for me is the ms 1.1. Too bad that cant handle my low sens properly. But if you have sens like 40cm for 360 or faster then its fine
I am sure you can't. I joined tag a month ago. Well we started to play some day but usually mix and I don't really like that. Urtier is going inactive, biqq away afaik. aphesia and Lightning is active but still a proper line up is needed. would be a great team though. Maybe for lan.
DPI is not relevant in ET as ET has an outdated aiming system. Basically, the higher your DPI goes, the more likely you are to get neg accel, so you have to use a relatively low value.
I'm sure there is difference between 450 and 900 when you play with high sensitivity. I don't know really cause i stick to low dpi since I am lowsenser.
I've been a bit of a whore when it comes to sensitivity (high, mid, low). Always found any advantage 800/900 dpi gave over 400/450 was too small to be measured/non existant (whilst I'd have to deal with the mouse being over sensitive).
But those are just my experiences and it's no mystery why most pro gamers in whatever game they play use low dpi!
What I meant is any advantage is theoretical, so let's say you got 400 DPI and the sensor of a mouse sees the surface as:
. . . .
what if an enemy is between two points? you'd theoretically not be able to put your crosshair on him.
Now if you had 800 DPI
. . . . . . . .
You should now be able to cleanly put your crosshair between these two dots and fire on him. Sadly in reality this doesn't happen, 400 dpi is more than accurate enough even at higher sensitivities and there's a lot of arguing about whether this sweet spot in between even exists. What you will have to deal with at 800 dpi is every non aim related movement of the mouse (twitch, shake etc) will make your aim less steady and in a game where all you do is track you don't need all those nuisances.
In a clan competitively? Never. BiO for 20 minutes, random 3on3s, 5on5s, filling in for Impact when they have a player missing or a team who needs a merc for an official yes. I'm not that much of an enigma so when I'm on IRC it's almost certainly because I'm looking for an ET fix ;>
Nah I meant as in, when I have an urge to game I play ET. I don't have any drive to sit down with a team and practice 3 days a week or whatever, those days are long gone.
I've played ET competitively for >5 years, it's been forever since I've improved individually and although the average skill level has gotten a lot better, I don't struggle so there's no incentive. Team strategies have also only become watered down in my opinion so I the idea of working with 4 other people to get better at rambo self killing is painful.
Indeed, I haven't been in any competitive team yet, I'm playing for aslong as I have this account. But what I do know and want is these magnificant tactics to somehow reamerge, as in the times of uq.gaming, 141, idle.ee, and even before that with junk52, etc. etc.
Intelligence isn't the problem at all, people are simply doing what is most effective in 5on5 and that's be incredibly aggressive whenever they can. There's not much room for innovation when one persons full spawn means you lose your stage, combined with the fact there's no competition other than between the top 3 spots.
No new maps doesn't help as there's now an established way to attack and defend every map.
I mean say you're a budding team and you want to beat impact/dignitas etc, you don't have as good of a team on paper, you can't really improve your tactics because they're perfect they just need to be executed correctly, you don't play enough to have perfect execution and even then you need to get around the individual skill problem so you're a weaker team and can't really do anything about it, it's up to them to slack and get beaten.
not
How the hell can you push those buttons? even on the razer DA I was able to push the back side button only (in action).
And although this mouse is quite expensive, it can have the DPI of your choice, ranging from 100 to 5600.
Most comfortible mouse for me is the ms 1.1. Too bad that cant handle my low sens properly. But if you have sens like 40cm for 360 or faster then its fine
But those are just my experiences and it's no mystery why most pro gamers in whatever game they play use low dpi!
. . . .
what if an enemy is between two points? you'd theoretically not be able to put your crosshair on him.
Now if you had 800 DPI
. . . . . . . .
You should now be able to cleanly put your crosshair between these two dots and fire on him. Sadly in reality this doesn't happen, 400 dpi is more than accurate enough even at higher sensitivities and there's a lot of arguing about whether this sweet spot in between even exists. What you will have to deal with at 800 dpi is every non aim related movement of the mouse (twitch, shake etc) will make your aim less steady and in a game where all you do is track you don't need all those nuisances.
So if I understand this correctly, you are waiting for updates of any kind surrounding the W:ET scene, because something is wrong with it I presume?
Clarify?
I've played ET competitively for >5 years, it's been forever since I've improved individually and although the average skill level has gotten a lot better, I don't struggle so there's no incentive. Team strategies have also only become watered down in my opinion so I the idea of working with 4 other people to get better at rambo self killing is painful.
Is it the lack of intelligence or what?
Remember my name, for it will go down in history.
No new maps doesn't help as there's now an established way to attack and defend every map.
I mean say you're a budding team and you want to beat impact/dignitas etc, you don't have as good of a team on paper, you can't really improve your tactics because they're perfect they just need to be executed correctly, you don't play enough to have perfect execution and even then you need to get around the individual skill problem so you're a weaker team and can't really do anything about it, it's up to them to slack and get beaten.
It's good, but why it has to be exactly the Mamba?
Because you wanna Cableless Mouse only?
Is this mouse any good?
I don't get the logic >_<
You asked if it's any good, than you say it's awsome, buy this thing than :D
":D"
":D"
You might get a "keystroke".