Copperhead vs. DiamondBack
•
15 Nov 2010, 20:32
•
Journals
The two mice has the same shape?
» Your journal body must be at least 40 characters long. You currently have 32 characters.
» Your journal body must be at least 40 characters long. You currently have 32 characters.
=> mx518
diamondback outperforms copperhead in any way. Lifting distance, max acceleration, max speed. It stays accurate way more then copperhead, even at insane high speeds.
I used to have a Copperhead back in 2006, can't remember how good it was tho :(
Gonna trade my DiamondBack for a Copperhead tomorrow :)
What do you think?
Its a good alternative for deathadder and mx518 when you have smaller hands or just want a different shape which is more suited to aiming with your fingers.
it's my next best thing atm that I can't get original db anywhere anymore
what's the one you use atm?
Have u tried those zowie ec mouses btw?
still laying around: deathadder (mouse1 sometimes fails) - mx300 (perfect shape) - mx500 (weight removed + scroll fucked up :) - mx310 (perfect shape) - mx510 (weight removed) - broken diamondback x 2 - microsoft wmo - g5 (used about 2 hours) - broken copperhead - broken pro click 1.6
+ about 7 mousepads :D
Logitech: mx 300, 310, 500, 510, 518, 518(new version), G5
Razer: pro click 1.6 (x6), abyssus, diamondback, copperhead, salmosa, deathadder
Microsoft: wmo, IEM 3.1, habu
Steelseries: Ikari optical, kinzu
Roccat: pyra
Think I even forget some :P Anyway, atm I'm using artisan g3 kai mousepad, but otherwise I've mostly used just qpad CT and stuff like that (not much worth mentioning)
And I've liked the infra-red mouses most. On the other hand diamondback was the best as long as it worked
then they BOTH SUCK