skill meter
•
18 Nov 2010, 17:00
•
Journals
Hey guys.
Question,how you guys know,are you med-,med+,high+?
Is that about how much you kill or teamwork or how many scrims you have been?
Was today in google:P
Question,how you guys know,are you med-,med+,high+?
Is that about how much you kill or teamwork or how many scrims you have been?
Was today in google:P
anything else u need ?
It was some movie about these three guys in the wild west or something, but I forgot the name. It was quite funny if I recall.
the movie is O Brother Where Art Thou
funny as fuck
1. u played OC prem, EC, NC and ur STILL active in a well known team, 80% of cF knows you:
high (also high does not have - or +. high is high)
2. u are well known around the community, you have a stable team and you beat some of the other top tier clans once in a while:
med+
3. u played ET for a long time but you dont really have a stable team any longer but everytime you do actually play you lead your team to victory (comms, obj, etc) and you have oustanding scores:
med/+
4. you are an "over the average" ET player:
med
5. your not active that much any longer or in your 2/3rd year of learning ET:
med-
6. u think ur uber but u only play for a year and a half, you only try and frag and you have chat-binding but at least u laways have more damage than everyone else added together:
low+ (max^^)
7. ur learning the game but you can tell that you improved a lot cause you can predict where/what/when/how etc:
low
8. you still learning and you often get timing and positioning wrong, or ur a member of KRP:
low-
9. u r pretty new (only a couple of months ETpro) to game:
noskill
--> which makes me med-
KRP aka 2nd best mix team in ET :$?
ALNC( better known as SKK!) is 1st, 2nd is KRP, 3rd is TAG. Tag hardly play anymore either so that's probably why.
This discussion was about "top 3 MIXTEAMS" which KRP currently is with their 20+ man lineup who play randomly. A stable team of 5 is not a mixteam.
so I'm a med-?
you inactive (but have been over average)?
you learning (hard like a 14yo that first came to) ET?
if your new to the game and you search a med+ war on IRC and barely manage to win... ur actually low/+, welcome to ET2008+.
but again i cant say anything about you personally cause i simply dont know you. there are always exceptions from the rule and there are always people with special talents (that maybe hide the lack of something else).
so if your playing for 2 years and u did not only get the aim straight but ur actually on top of the tactical stuff aswell (experience > * in this game) then u can manage it to "at least med-" even by older standarts...
if you dont want me to flame you for commenting like a braindead then lets end it here... thats what i thought at least
PS: nice skill measurements lowbob
you dont wonna hear my message thats why ur mad.
if you want to know what i wrote previously then read it.
conversation over.
no1 even dared to claim they are high skilled.
high skilled was reserved for the very best of the best. it was defined by the community.
being high skilled is at least 50% team based. if your not active you are not part of a working team. therefore you can be as good as you want but you are not high.
hayaaAti_
hmm
oh wait
not the desired effect
Win (impossible): megahigh
Almost win or maybe win sp_delivery: high
Make slow times and get some frags but still lose clearly: med+
Get spawnraped: med or lower
Also I rofled at that fucking stupid
Besides based on your skill meters I belong in both high and low- which is funny
if you expose yourself liek that, posting a journal after EVERY SINGLE SCRIM u manage to win by luck, u must be able to deal with the flame.
funny how you guys throw punches but cant even take the slightest hit (by a fucking random) w/o bursting in tears.
i said that the reason you commented on "OC = high" is that you did not WANT to read the rest of the sentence (which makes it far from "OC = high") because you are mad that i flamed KRP. no arguing about that at that stage so id rather drop that poor argument (or can you really not read at all).
Anyhow playing OC prem, EC, NC and being STILL active in a well known team, with 80% of cF knowing you does not make a player highskilled when we look at in-game playing efficiency. A counter-example is sufficient to disprove this: Humm3l
if id specify "known by 80% of cF for being a GOOD player" humm3l would drop out immediately (tho i doubt even 40% of cF knows what humm3l is up to atm).
also the team-GER he was "part of" was no team-GER.
as i said there are exceptions form the rule and as i said aswell dont get me started on that humm3l.
but honestly if it was active it would be performing well
= I am megahigh
0-39 xp per 15 mins map -> you are low, sorry ;(
40-79 xp -> low+
80-119 xp-> med.
120-159 xp -> med.+
160-199 xp -> high
200-239 xp -> high +
240 and more -> you should be banned cause of cheats
300 and more -> you are the butchji
40-79 xp -> getting started
80-119 xp-> low
120-159 xp -> low+
160-199 xp -> med
200-239 xp -> med+
240 and more -> med+ (good day)
tites when you make more ET ARTWORK !!
was a good day
5o5 scrim 136xp(they were low+I was engi)
2 maps
The scale is arbitrary, everything is relative. The best will set the benchmark and everyone else falls into place underneath.
if you have more knowledge of ET and can aim better than me then you are > med
randompic:
you play average = med
you play bad = low
isnt that it?