NAS Repost

Thinking about buying a NAS[/b]]Network-attached storage (NAS) is file-level computer data storage connected to a computer network providing data access to heterogeneous clients. As of 2010[update] NAS devices are gaining popularity, as a convenient method of sharing files between multiple computers.Potential benefits of network-attached storage, compared to file servers, include faster data access, easier administration, and simple configuration. soon to store all of my audo/video-files, make backups, etc. I've heard it can also be used for webhosting or DNS purposes so that would be interesting aswell.

Would be nice to hear who here actually owns a NAS and:

- What brand and type?
- Uses?
- Which of the following RAID-modi would you use: JOBD / 0 / 1?

I think I'll go for the DS211J[/b]]image: Synology-DiskStation-DS211j, all I need now are some decent hard drives (1 or 1.5 TB), do give me some suggestions please.


image: THISGONBGUD
Comments
22
i have no idea what youre talking about so heres a fish <><
i just updated my synology 209

my disks are:

image: ds209

no raid, both volumes are formated as basic and mounted as volume1/2
So you're using a 1TB and a 2TB disk °°_ ?

I suppose you don't have them in RAID since disks should have the same capacity right? (your edit just made this question look kinda useless :D).

What features of Synology are you using btw and can you give me some quick pros and cons?
Parent
nop, no raid.

Pros:

it really is fast
its running on lnx which offers loads of options (svn etc)
im using the media server, the download station the web station, the backup station

synology might be a bit more expansive than others, but its worth the money...

cons:

not quite sure i found some yet, my nas is running really smooth since over a year
Parent
What R/W-speeds do you get?
Parent
since im on a 100mbit network i dont think this is really reliable, but im reading with the full network speed, writing is around 9mb/s or sometimes even 10 as in full...
Parent
thought about the rapper.
hes the king.
i would buy myself a mini pc and put in 2 hard drives and install ubuntu server on it.

that is how i have set up my nas, with an atom dual core cpu, 2gb ram and 2,5tb disk space, running on ubuntu server 64bit.
loud, expansive and way too high power consumption
Parent
works very very good for me, and i am playing .m2ts files directly from my nas using nginx webserver with my playstation 3 slim. 1080p no problem, not to mention any kind of .avi files. ;-)

only bad thing on that ps3 is, that it doens't support .mkv files to be played directly from the ps3, but with the dual core atom nas i can remux the movies into .m2ts files very quickly. ;-)

i like the setup here how it is and normally the nas isn't running 24/7, since i wake it up on lan when it is needed.
Parent
loud? i don't think a atom machine would be really loud..
And Atom expensive? Not cheap, but certainly not that expensive.
High power consumption? How would you know if you don't even know what kind of atom or what other specs he has.
Parent
Uh, just saying shit cause you got no clue or? oO
Parent
That about doing that as well but it doesn't really fit into the budget atm :).
Parent
well the disks im using are not the cheapest too, they are performance disks for 1080p streaming...
Parent
why not 2TB? they are not expensive, Samsung EcoGreen F4EG, 2TB
is silent and doesn't use a lot of power good for NAS.

That's what i would use.

And raid, certainly not 0. Unless you would also make backups from your NAS.

Atom machine isn't that bad. Even i3 is good, you can get it around 20~30 idle. Because i3 will perform the same task faster than an atom, so it will get faster to idle. Also something to think about.

My choice would be waiting for sandy bridge i3, buy h67 motherboard = win. But i am more demanding.
Since the NAS itself already comes close to 200 EUR, I'm not planning on spending more than 100-150 on 2 hard drives so 1 or 1.5 TB will be more than enough.
Parent
2x samsung f4 is here 144 euro with sending so a bit over 150.
Price difference here between 1.5 and 2TB is like 10~15 euro's.

I mostly look at price per gb ratio, and with 2TB its better now atm.
Parent
So 2 of these would be your advice? These 2 babies would run smooth in RAID-1?

Hmm I guess it is a bit more futureproof but the whole package is pretty expensive :p.
Parent
Just did some research and the only bang-for-the-buck 2 TB drive (Samusing F4EG) is not mentioned in the supported HD list. I also found some topics on the synology forum which stated some problems with it like being very noisy and some trouble getting them out of sleep mode.

I think I'll rather go for a bit less storage, making everything a bit cheaper and assuring me that I won't have any problems with them since they are 100 % supported: the Samsung F2EG.
Parent
my second choice with also good price/gb ratio.
Parent
the 0 in raid 0 stands for how much data you will be able to recover should either of your disks develop a fault
Back to top