Explain to me...

by zafoga • 16 May 2011, 18:20 • Journals
... how this can be enjoyable for anyone who liked ET or in general quake3engine based games for its gameplay ?

dogfights = standstill pray and spray , movement doesnt exist etc.




image: jr75sm
Comments
16
▼
Deann 16 May 2011, 19:25
image: Venkman1

and wtf that picture, vains on your abs epic
▼
huumeantti 16 May 2011, 19:28
could it be because they speak german in the game, and they also speak german in et?
▼
Krii 16 May 2011, 19:29
u forget the ammo, healing etc part
▼
bachOrr 16 May 2011, 19:29
wtf is this shit game?
▼
kreatiir 16 May 2011, 19:33
+ TEN TOUSANT MILIJON
Parent
▼
chosen 16 May 2011, 19:40
spectating a lowbob in et is exactly like that. 5 days old game and you expecting every1 to be highskilled and full of game sense or what?
▼
butchji 16 May 2011, 21:10
he is talking about the engine and the overall gameplay not some nonrelevant skill of players
Parent
▼
chosen 17 May 2011, 15:06
I still dont get it, sry :c
Parent
▼
tacocat 16 May 2011, 20:00
yes, lets judge a game by watching gameplay of a public server.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMuT4KHGvI4
▼
sandbag 16 May 2011, 20:18
Why do people keep comparing it to et? Only retards would think that brink could replace et. It's a good game by itself, but like etqw and rtcw2, it will never replace et.

*jaymod/noquarter publics actually have a lot of players that are good aimers and brained, shame you can't tell if they are legit or not
▼
zafoga 17 May 2011, 00:25
iam not comparing it to ET iam just simply wondering why ppl who actually liked ET for the gameplay , fast movements low/no recoil and just a lil spread when this is pretty much the opposite ? I mean i dont judge CoD or BF or what ever , i dont like games trying to imitate realism yet there is a big pool of ppl hyping it and ye its fine if they like it why not ?

iam just surprised becoz i thought the majority of the community liked ET for the same reason i do ... not alot of ppl liked ETQW nor Wlfnstn yet those 2 products are pretty equal to what ive seen from brink so far.

my conclusion is that ppl simply dont expect another game that is aimed for the competitive scene and just eat what they are gettin on their plate.
Parent
▼
zaNc 16 May 2011, 20:33
so if u like q3e u cant possibly like any game that aint based on it?
▼
zafoga 17 May 2011, 00:17
no the problem is that they want to hit the majority with their product ... small learning curve is now king over a long time learning experience :<

take a look at the quake live forums ... new players are gone in like 1 week (a small percentage is actually staying and trying to improve)

the majority doesnt want fast movements and 1on1 situation where you can outplay someone with movement alone , the majority wants to press buttons , fire and kill , the majority wants to boot their pc after work and shine. --> UT is dying QL is dying Painkiller died long agon

tldr its not the engine in general , dont think they got problems makin a fast paced game with a big movement influence equal or better compared to the q3 or havok 2.0 engine
Parent
▼
stack 16 May 2011, 22:44
explain to me... EXPLAIN TO ME!!!! IN WHAT WAY IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE AN RPG ANYWAYS IF U CANT DO QUESTS AND STUFF?!
▼
chosen 17 May 2011, 15:05
well, isnt an objective smth like a quest? :p
Parent
▼
AmAzOn 16 May 2011, 22:54
I just bought it, I meet the requirements for the game but still I'm getting 40 fps only:< darn!!!!!
Back to top