Jere > XyLoS ???
•
18 May 2011, 13:25
•
Journals
yes,
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
Jere > XyLoS
now I'm terrible and he's pretty good
Sad story :(
jere cant even win a lan with 6 "crossfire med+" teams :P
P.S Love you al1m8
And now I am still pretty good and he's still terrible.
And now I am still pretty good and he's still terrible.
but they are not the same persons so both have a different game style so both contribute to the team in their unique ways, the one who plays better in a mix is a better shooter.
e: for mongols who cant think, im talking about
u cant compare them when they are playing with their teams,
the one who is a better aim-based player is the one who will get better scores/kills on a total random mix game ORLY
2 of the most retarded statements I've seen in a long time