Illegal to dance in America
•
30 May 2011, 13:16
•
Journals
6.59
Police arrested them for dancing & slam one bloke to the ground, wtf?
e:Does your right to self defence exist against the police?
|
35.2 %
(19 votes)
|
|
64.8 %
(35 votes)
|
http://www.crossfire.nu/?x=journal&mode=item&id=128377
btw i read that Obama wanted a law where he could just randomly attack any country any time he wanted without a reason, LOL GG WORLD if tht happends
he's obviously already breaking the war laws yet no1 seems to give a shit
You read about that Obama thing in the sun :DD. such a fail paper. Never read that paper after i was 16 cause it seriously fails.
i prolly herd it Alex Jones' show
are u stupid? ofc not, rofl..
we all know it happens, but unfortunately it doesnt get punished as hard as if we`d attack an officer, will it be with or without any reason.
though, it wouldn't surprise me if they were genuinely retarded police officers either
the video is sad to watch either way
That's badass, healing animals on the battlefield and stuff
and as the same laws account for everyone they acted in the only way they could.
(and the 2nd video does show that they did in fact issue warnings but these kids were provoking)
polics says dont dance -> you dont dance.
police says hands behind your back -> hands behind your back.
resisting police force puts them in a situation where they HAVE to apply force. confrontation with the executive has no room for discussion that is what the legislative is for.
s: http://www.welt.de/print/die_welt/politik/article13401921/Kein-Haschisch-fuer-deutsche-Kiffer.html
What a fucking retard reaction !
in what kind of shitty country to you live to believe that the police wants something bad for you? lol sad for you nerds
i do what the police tells me to do cause i believe that they act in MY best interest and I can not complain AT ALL so far. but u r a cheese eating communist surrender monkey dont even know why i waste my time on you, you wont be able to grasp it. using the "jump off a bridge" example in this context should basically exclude you from any political argument for the rest of your life.
Hopefully these "dancers" didn't coperate and I really can't wait for a judge sentence.
We'll see who are the retards.
e : noone of this policetards gave a law that forbid dancing here. Then, under wich reason they arrested them ? If they didn't have, they're totally wrong.
no case to case judging. cops dont make the rules they enforce them.
i am glad those hippies did not cooprate and will face sentences for that.
deal with it
social welfare detected.
go on with ur paroles and wonder why no1 cares for hippies.
Don't play with fire if you don't want to get burned. Or stand the heat. Whatever the expression is.
what were they doin wrong? you can DANCE?! :DDDD
theres not fkin law that says you cant, gtfo
also watch the vid from the 2nd perspective (second half). the officers told them to get lost and they started dancing.
deserved
if you do not wish to be a racist you may not make any distinction what so ever.
many people doing the same thing in an organized fashion has to be considered a demonstration of some sort... (better google the meaning of the term "to demonstrate something")... even if it is only a demonstration of joy.
equal rights for everyone and in this case equal prohibition for everyone or else you give other interest groups a ground to work with/on.
welcome to politics
they ment no harm, they just wanted to prove smthin (i guess)
america the "free" country
its GOOD that ppl STAND UP to things & rebel
and resisting a direct police order and the following arrest while lead to the use of force that is widely known.
they will prolly have to adress the underlying law with all the resulting public pressure, and that is due to "martyrmdom" like that, but everything just went like it had to with these guys behaving like that.
if u r a wnb rebel you must be able to take the heat and notice that the guy in the white Tshirt getting arrested played it cool, like he should have. those retards yelling "police state" and "slavery" were the scared kids to the side who simply do not want to see that the police had no other hoice but to react.
they do what they deem most appropriate (and again learn the difference between executive and legislative authority if you want to blame some1 for the law in the first place) and they are trained not to accept any resistance. this is nessecary to support their authority. judgements are NOT made on a case to case basis, they follow what they learned and what they get paid to do.
what they say has to be done, no arguing you will NEVER "get your right", as a citizen you are requried to obey the representatives of the law. if they say "dont dance" and you start to dance they will take you into custody (not an arrest or lawsuit per se) to defuse the situation. if you resist that they take you to the ground. if you fight it further they will use a tazer and pepper spray. that is textbook shit and nothing else could have been expected.
dont argue with the police during a deployment, in fact you dont have a right to do that.
everbody would admit that this is a case where a law does seem to affect something rather innocent and does not rly make that much sense.
but the police MUST NOT judge that, they have to act as it is asked of them and one also has to be honest enough to admit that they were provocing and resisting arrest and that the police procedures may look quite harsh but are, as far as my newb eye can tell, rather textbook.
e: if they wanted to make a statement by doing that they sure as hell did, and raised attention. but the discussion part will have to take place in front of a judge and getting arrest must have been part of their plan (if they had one that is).
getting arrested for soemthing stupid to raise awareness involves getting arrested and you must be aware of the fact that this is whats going to happen when you disobey a dicrect police order.
i dont know how it vould be any clearer
he was explicitly warned not to dance.
he was taken into custody for doing it anyway.
he was thrown to the ground for continously resisting arrest.
he would have been tazed and/or pepper sprayed (and theyd prolly pull a gun on him, it is america afterall) if he throws punches.
- youre an officer
- a close friend of you is an officer
- a close family member of you is an officer
i cant think of any reasons why you are really trying this hard to get these ignorant peeps convinced
its what i am studying and i enjoy it even in my spare time :)
also i believe that you can not value people who work for the benefit of the community enough.
you nerds know this right? ^
these police officers are a shame!