Revising

first

Make mindmaps of all the subjects you need to learn. Might help

play more brink

i love this song <3

your teachers are right

Piegie??? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSbh2MsxdNs&feature=related

<3 u

your own fault !!

Making your latin on Teamspeak while its almost 24.00 ... I told you man :p but no harm is done.

Do good exams. Make mindmaps of every course. Make summary's

and revise,revise,revise,revise,revise

In Belgium when you pass all exams. you automaticly recieve an A :)

teachers are right this time

Just read like devil... Didn't study shit nor attended classes for matriculation exams (2-3 years of stuff) or uni exams and still scored high results and passed with just two-three days of studying.

Pay attention to the most important bits whatever you studying on. Most of the content in school books is bull considering you get a question or two from rather wide areas where most of the special stuff is reserved for those who actually know their subjects. Write up important bits to computer and construct a bigger picture in your mind from the course.

Also, spend time in reading. If you're a slow reader, pay attention to everything. If you're quick, go through everything once or twice and then read the whole thing with thought.

School really doesn't take any brains so it doesn't matter if you're retarded or not. Just actually get on with studying and you'll see how well you'll perform.

It would help to know what subject you were studying. But generally the best way to revise is to focus on concepts then mind map ideas out of these concepts in order to get a grasp of the subject as quickly as possible. For example, if you were revising Victorian literature then one concept would be chronology; that is, how do you define Victorian literature and in what ways is it different from, say, nineteenth-century literature?

Once you mind map out this concept you realise a number of the issues involved. For example, if you want to define Victorian literature chronologically then you have a number of issues to contend with: if you define it as literature during Queen Victoria's reign then does literature stop becoming Victorian after she dies, and what makes her reign different from those before and after (and what about writers who continued to write after she died, did their work change); how does this literature develop (or how is it different) from literature at the beginning of the nineteenth century; and how do you deal with the issue of the long-nineteenth century?

In all honesty, it is not as hard as it sounds and you should already have a fairly good idea about what might be covered.