6v6 serverconfig

by Lazio • 18 Aug 2011, 22:06 • Journals
For the people that have been pm'ing me, here's the 6v6 server config.

http://aleksiandrej.wippiespace.com/config.zip
or
http://z4j3.biz/et/revive6on6.zip
Comments
49
▼
miNd 18 Aug 2011, 23:07
MG?

GOT MG INNIT?

IF NO GTFO?
▼
Lazio 18 Aug 2011, 23:08
atm i dont think it's concluded, up to kevin to decide it for the first big 6v6 cup :)
Parent
▼
miNd 18 Aug 2011, 23:10
MG or no deal.
Parent
▼
shmoe 18 Aug 2011, 23:17
we need back hitsounds for nades, arti, airstrike and mg! and flameR!!! :DD
▼
h20xyg3n 18 Aug 2011, 23:54
PLUS FUCKING ONE OMG.
Parent
▼
Nub 18 Aug 2011, 23:52
b_simpleitems unlock plox
▼
Jo0f 19 Aug 2011, 00:08
while youre at it you may want to allow maxpackets 125 and snaps 40 after 6 years of jagged gameplay x)
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 04:11
I though about it before and madscientist told me it's a bad idea to use snaps 40 because of some bug i can't remember. And if i'm not wrong, even if you allow 125 maxpackets, the engine only supports 100.


edit: oh, maybe it wasn't snaps... it was sv_fps 40 xD my bad
Parent
▼
Jo0f 19 Aug 2011, 08:24
Both work ;o
Parent
▼
douille 19 Aug 2011, 11:54
snaps 40 doesn't work properly because ETpro has been coded to work with snaps 20 (at least bani / reyalp / etpro nerds from the forum said so)
125 maxpackets works ? I thought it wasn't implemented in ET, only Q3cpma
Parent
▼
baq 19 Aug 2011, 00:26
unlock b_simpleitems and all soldier weapons ! I want real old school!!!
▼
Hampuusi 19 Aug 2011, 00:35
whatever u do u cant please the ppl in here
▼
Skyshaper 19 Aug 2011, 02:27
Why so many restrictions for this old game it's with like having ferrari car with honda engine.....

125 packets > 100

Mg> no mg

Prone delay you must be fat , never seeing a fat man in army go to war

R dephtbits 24? I like steady fps 0 option
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 04:09
ET engine doesn't support 125 packets i think ;o
Parent
▼
Skyshaper 19 Aug 2011, 04:40
try this on a config
command "sv_cvar cl_maxpackets IN 100 125"

command "sv_cvar cg_fov IN 90 140"

FOV 140 SHOULD BE ALLOWED WITH THE NEW WIDE SCREENS!!!!!

anyone with a brain can see all of these configs desperately need an update.
Parent
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 04:48
I have requested a fov "unlock" since last xmas when i bought a 24 widescreen. Been playing really shit since then because i play with huge black bars around my screen... r_mode 8 in order to use fov 120 properly...

to use 1920x80 with "fov 120" i would need something like 137 i think :|

And allowing simpleitems at 5v5 cfg but not at 3v3 is just pure retardness, they should have fixed it already.

Will test the maxpackets tomorrow then ;) currently at my laptop, no et installed there :X
Parent
▼
Edgar 19 Aug 2011, 09:26
It depends which fov you used on your old monitor. I used 105 on my 17" crt and should use 120,2 on my 24" wide screener.
Parent
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 13:43
Quoter_mode 8 in order to use fov 120 properly...


:D
Parent
▼
Edgar 19 Aug 2011, 13:45
r_mode -1
r_customheight "1080"
r_customwidth "1920"
cg_fov 120

Works just fine for me.
Parent
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 13:50
Do not go into smart mode right now dude ;)

http://www.crossfire.nu/?x=journal&mode=item&id=132565#comment2961458
Parent
▼
Edgar 19 Aug 2011, 13:51
I am aware of the issue you got there smart ass. :D Felt the same but as I told I got used to it.
Parent
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 14:17
It's not the same, not even close. Trust me, i've used fov 120 since my 1st week at et, more than 5 years ago, and it is just unplayable for me.
Parent
▼
Edgar 19 Aug 2011, 14:18
You've had wide screener for over 5 years now?
Parent
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 14:26
No, been playing for 3+ years in a huge crt @ r_mode 8, fov 120, 120hz or more
http://beta-gaming.de/et/ag0n/TJ_MOVIE_TESTS/DSC03490.JPG

But the screen took me to much space and the colors were kinda yellowish, so i decided to buy a LCD 24' 120hz/3D shizzle, turns out it kinda sucks because i don't play at native resolution, ending up with a huge input lag comparing to my crt, plus i have to play with some huge black bars around.

Why? because this engine has bugs and people can fix them, but they don't want to. Its just a matter of change a fucking string inside global config.
Parent
▼
Edgar 19 Aug 2011, 14:34
Figured. I used 17" crt before as I told and moving to this 24" wide screener (full hd, 2ms, led but not full led) was pain in the ass as well, the fov looks strange etc. I'd be happy to try bigger fov tho. :)
Parent
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 14:36
use the fov calculator to know the exact fov you need ;)

http://www.emsai.net/projects/widescreen/fovcalc/
Parent
▼
Edgar 19 Aug 2011, 14:39
From Old FOV: 1.3333333333333:1 aspect = 105 (FOV horizontal)
To New FOV: 1.7777777777778:1 aspect = 120.15955599101 (FOV horizontal)

And I am using 120. But if you used bigger monitor and different fov before it's different for you.
Parent
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 14:45
No idea then, i am not a expert xD but the fov is just a trick to make it look like the old times... it's not a perfect fix, so it is normal that it isn't 100% the same...
Parent
▼
torM 19 Aug 2011, 04:09
put the mg in again... if u gonna bring 6on6 back, allow ppl to use it
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 04:10
IF you allow fov 140 and b_simpleitems 1, i will move to 6v6 for sure.
▼
spiROZE 19 Aug 2011, 09:33
ok i read what you typed above :) play with everything stretched, I love that..
Parent
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 13:49
well, but you see less! IF i use fov 120 at widescreen, i see alot less comparing to a normal resolution. It feels like fov 105 or 110 max, which is a big difference for someone that have always used fov 120.
Parent
▼
spiROZE 19 Aug 2011, 13:54
strange, cause when I went from a normal lcd to a widescreen, I didn't change any setting and I still did the same degrees/cm
Parent
▼
RaNA 19 Aug 2011, 05:19
Eats the point of this 6o6 when not g & mortar idiot remake or gtfo
▼
beach 19 Aug 2011, 07:17
6on6 nopb configs whit mg and mapscipts

http://up.servut.us/32069
▼
Skyshaper 19 Aug 2011, 07:52
what about the other restriction? 125 packets , fov 140 ???? like Mind said IF NO GTFO?
Parent
▼
beach 19 Aug 2011, 08:17
I dont edit fov to 140 because 2 unknow hero want it..
Parent
▼
mana 19 Aug 2011, 12:16
gtfo with ur 140 fov nigger.
Parent
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 13:47
ITS A BUG, why not fix it?

et doesn't know how to resize properly for widescreen resolutions. The only "fix" is to use higher fog in order to get the "old" feeling.

We have changed some stuff around, why not change this one? Higher fov users at full hd would appreciate it.
Parent
▼
douille 19 Aug 2011, 15:18
fov change isn't a bug, it is normal due to the different aspect ratio. If you set your your monitor to it's native resolution, only the 2D will be stretched (xhair etc) but the game will look 1:1. But as the fov is calculated "in width", and due to the aspect ratio, you see less in height. So you have to increase it to get your old fov "in height", resulting in a wider fov.
Anyhow, it's pretty easy to get used to a lower fov. + it helps aiming.
Parent
▼
ag0n 19 Aug 2011, 15:34
ye, but thats something that the engine should take care in the first place. It's not my fault that the engine doesn't fully support widescreen resolutions :P


and i've been trying since xmas, doesn't work for me :) almost 5+ years of fov 120...
Parent
▼
Skyshaper 20 Aug 2011, 07:07
can't these LUA files fix that problem??? i can tell these people are really without a brain on updating configs / engine / ETpro MOD to todays technology / components
Parent
▼
ag0n 20 Aug 2011, 14:09
lua should be able to fix it, but the etpro lua is kinda limited. I am pretty sure we can't do this using etpro lua, but i am not a expert. :|
Parent
▼
Skyshaper 21 Aug 2011, 02:59
then a new mod should be coded ? which should be done anyways ETpro is super old and the person that made it has a dildo up his ass so he won't update it / release source.
Parent
▼
ag0n 21 Aug 2011, 08:49
if Bani could release etpro source code and some expert could improve it.. there is alot to be done!! it would be great!
Parent
Back to top