The mouse - is there really a difference?
•
11 Dec 2006, 11:38
•
Journals
Hey guys, I just read a bit through the article over @ esreality about the difference between all the mize out there. Since I am still using the old Microsoft Intellipoint optical I was wondering if you noticed and important difference when switching from one mouse to the other. Does it pay out to change?
thx for sharing your opinion
thx for sharing your opinion
I really tested a lot of mouses and I always ended up using my 5 years old Explorer 3.0 with 400 DPI :-d
The Large difference is the quality of the lasers/optical and its tracking and ease to set up. With the copperhead you needed firmware etc which was just a pain not worth messing around with compared to logtiechs plug and play. All factors about skipping and tracking are explained perfectly by sujoy and are definetly worth taking into mind when buying a new mouse.
and 400dpi ftw imo :P
razer<3
I dont think that inbetween brand models there is a huge difference, I had the diamondback and then the copperhead and didnt notice a whole lot of change.
edit : oops misread :(
i actually agree with you!
Oh and dont buy a laser mouse, but optical (laser dont work on all mousepads and are less reliable i read.)
THAT S MARKETING DONT FALL FOR IT!!!
ok i actually bought a g5 10 months ago but my mx 510 's mousefeet were almost gone and i wanted something new.
Anyway who move his mouse so fast that it could lose control?
at first i couldn't do shit with it, mainly because it's a lot bigger..
I think it's the same with everything ,you first have to get used to it before you can play well with it, and i don't think it makes any difference at all what mouse/polling rate etc you use :x
Just go to a big electronics store where they have the mice out of their boxes so you can just feel them.