EC cards
•
1 Oct 2011, 17:14
•
Journals
http://clanbase.ggl.com/cupcard.php?&lid=12283
Yesterday codelust received a red card as it seems, because Statti decided to play for oxid (although he obviously wasn't allowed to) after being removed from our lineup.
Just got me wondering here, why did codelust get the card instead of oxid? I can't see what our team did wrong here. It's not like we got the influence on players who aren't part of our lineup anymore. Instead oxid should've been aware of the rules and known that Statti isn't allowed to play in the qualifiers for more than just one team.
Also that yellow card for oxid seems a little ridiculous to me as many other teams used mercs aswell so why give just them the yellow card?
What do you guys think about these cards?
Yesterday codelust received a red card as it seems, because Statti decided to play for oxid (although he obviously wasn't allowed to) after being removed from our lineup.
Just got me wondering here, why did codelust get the card instead of oxid? I can't see what our team did wrong here. It's not like we got the influence on players who aren't part of our lineup anymore. Instead oxid should've been aware of the rules and known that Statti isn't allowed to play in the qualifiers for more than just one team.
Also that yellow card for oxid seems a little ridiculous to me as many other teams used mercs aswell so why give just them the yellow card?
What do you guys think about these cards?
uk version better though obviously, david brent is the win
he wasn't even a merc haha
thats so fucking right
Codelust has done absolutely nothing wrong and therefore must not be punished. An ex-Codelust player breaking the rules in his new team is not under the influence of Codelust.
The yellow card for Oxid is justified, they accepted a disallowed player to play with them so that the information that he is disallowed was freely available to them.
if it was for statti, thats ridiculous--> but maybe they gave u the card because u didnt let him play xDxD
nvm read the link, well thats kinda stupid
On the other hand, I am not completely sure about rules, but afaik team which uses merc in offi (I mean not allowed player who isnt even on their CB roster) is supposed to get insta forfeit loss, so I guess Oxid deserves red card at least.
Maybe the admins at CB must start thinking in stead of doing random stuff
So they actually had 4 of their own players + one merc (snoop) and one disallowed player. So shouldn't they be the ones getting a red card and not us? At least they added snoop on their roster 29th of September and the game was played 28th of September.
i guess there wasn't many other fins to choose from
. That much is obvious to all three of us concerned in this chain.
I guess it's only kind of note for admins made by GoldoraK
he want to remember about statti's suspension
I'm sure that this card will be removed
I really don't get where CB gets their supervisors (no offense), if you're not able to read and actually understand the rules u just shouldn't be there. and yes, we're all humans here and yes, we do make mistakes. but if u make them almost all the time and players and teams have to make topics all the time to correct supervisors mistakes it just says that the supervisors are incapable of handling (easy in most cases) situations.
PS. Where are u LION and Homer?
It is his DECISION.
But it wasn't mistake.
Well, i hope so...
Can't say anything cuz Goldi is still offline