Mobile
•
23 Jan 2012, 17:18
•
Journals
Who think mobile should be removed from the current 6on6 config?
I do :P
I have no idea who added it back in, but it was removed for a reason I suppose?
What you think about it? Maybe we could play nationscup without it ^^
I do :P
I have no idea who added it back in, but it was removed for a reason I suppose?
What you think about it? Maybe we could play nationscup without it ^^
mobile best weapon
serious discussion brah
i rest my case
I never minded the mortar compared to the mg. The mg just doesnt go well with competitive ET.
In my opinion it's only really effective on missile (talking about defending) with the current map pool. You might argue about it being effective on bremen, but since the changes made to the map I don't think that it's that powerful anymore.
When it comes to competitive gaming there are very few spots where you can actually stay stationary with MG for more than one spawn. Playing MG is all about reading the game and changing your position constantly to make it harder for the opponent to kill you. I'd say that MG is most effective on attacks used for a short period of time to take down a couple guys in full spawn and create chaos within the defence.
I think it's about this case, they might have something else in their mind tho :p
What I was asking for was if someone knew how to use MG efficiently on the defence, because I haven't seen it been used on defence for a couple years now.
It's only potential is to force axis to camp more untill the rifle takes him out and thus making the game more boring. Or to make it harder for allies to attack, again making the game more boring for both teams and spectators. Only the guy who enjoys playing the mg benefits from its use in competitive play.
It really doesn't make you skilled or a genuis to switch between two standard positions with the mobile.
I agree with you that a static MG in the defence staying on the same place all the time is very boring for the spectators. However I don't see that you could really use MG that way in other maps than missile (last stage, above that box at the broken wall). MG used in attacks on the other hand bring variation to attacks and forces defenders to adjust their way of playing, making it more interesting to watch for the spectators.
How do the others in the team not benefit from MG if it's working efficiently? It brings an additional tactical element to the game, which is very important to me atleast as I like to think of new ways to play the game. Also I don't see that MG is overpowered in the current competitive play except for missile, again. Missile could use some changes in the last part like old bremen did (or you could just remove the map).
I can see how it can be used on gr attack last stage or radar west to keep em under the thumb, but thats forcing them to camp imo. I guess it might be an asset on radar attack because there usually isnt a rifle on axis. But you could do the same with a sniper, just less annoying and overpowered. You can disagree, but I find that the bad about mg heavily outweighs the good. I found 6on6 before we moved to 5on5 the most fun because removing things like the mg were the result of a very long process of finetuning this game.
all in all u got a point that the sense of mg is doubtable. tho u may could ask
Mobile MG, be gone!
Tend to this or see yourself rise no further within this community.
anyone who wanted it or plays with it is a fucking retard
if you allow mg you should allow mortar 10 landmines and double airstrikes aswell.
e: i don't get why there's a debate about the mg while MISSILE is still being played
Just like the fact that it is in game for a reason also?
Twidi is too awesome with rifle to remove it, plus I'm also having fun with it now and then :D ( Won mg-battle vs Twidikaiser himself )
...
Nowadays it seems any CF member can come along and call a configset he created (with chapljas certify tool) the new global config and somehow people follows its lead