A way to stop aimbotting
•
20 Jan 2014, 03:48
•
Journals
For etpro 3.2.6 ofcourse!
Just found out something really cool with a pk3 i tested! As you know im trying to find ways to stop cheats
And this is my result.
ok client connects to server with aimbot, they get an unpure cgame failure due to the pk3 (meaning they cannot connect)
but because wallhack does not require this, it sadly means wallhack is not detectable (meaning wallhacks can connect)
so i have something that partly works?
Is that a good thing!?
If people wish to test this then they can by going to the i7 Gaming Server,
Just found out something really cool with a pk3 i tested! As you know im trying to find ways to stop cheats
And this is my result.
ok client connects to server with aimbot, they get an unpure cgame failure due to the pk3 (meaning they cannot connect)
but because wallhack does not require this, it sadly means wallhack is not detectable (meaning wallhacks can connect)
so i have something that partly works?
Is that a good thing!?
If people wish to test this then they can by going to the i7 Gaming Server,
you would get all the cheaters at least!!
And then fuck 'em over and format C: them and ban ip range!
EDIT: there was talk of them moving to silent mod. And we all know that we don't want that!
Besides there is AC for all modes called punkbuster, adding new md5 hashes would more solve problem atm than this pk3. Just sayin, if its outdated doesnt mean it doesnt work
And if the CG anticheat comes out in 2030 we will wait till 2030 without anything to stop any cheater at all?
Keep up your good work mate, cheers.
Have you tested your methods (lol) with linux cheats too?
Who's to say a aimbot (or a cheat itself) needs a pk3? Sure if you download a full package with shitloads of features (such as textures glowing and shit like that), it requires external stuff which a pk3 can provide.
But i am sure a "competitive" cheat (private, wtv), doesn't come with all this useless stuff.
This idea is so bad that i wonder how you even think it could work.
How would u do the detection? Based on filename? File size? What if someone changes the name or the size? You surely can't force anyone of having few extra pk3 on et / etpro folder, considering some public servers even download them to your hard drive.
Please genius, enlighten us.
And download a pk3? A 1mb pk3 and you cry about that? Ok Ok Calm down, we don't all have 0.1kbs connection. Maybe if you tested it for yourself you can see but i have tested it with people and it has so far worked!
A aimbot doesn't require a different cgame.dll, in fact it HACKS the original one (those kind of cheats are detected for a decade), because as you said, it will report as unpure (etpro does it if the server is set sv_pure 1 or something like that).
Afaik (not a expert talking here), the aimbot change memory positions (that cgame can provide them to begging with). That way, it becomes undetected because etpro doesn't have any reliable protection.
TZAC worked because it watched some changes based of patterns that X feature would require Y memory changes.
You didn't find any gold mine my friend, in fact etpro has this kind of protection since the beginning.. What kind of cheats are you even using? Free cheats from 2005? :D
edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineering read this, maybe it will enlighten that peanut brain
We can't know till we test :P saying is different from testing mate. because i tested a undetected hook that was used even for tzac and it was disconnected so lad come on name one?
This isn't css, internal hacks wouln't work in ET.
They probably all work on dll injection.
Its not a troll, The Links will be updated Soon.
He wanted to play against me on valhalla and after beeing killed 8 times arow he was so strustrated and banned me ;)
anyway dont sweat it, even tzac admins made more mistakes then you did:
http://web.archive.org/web/20120513155901/http://www.crossfire.nu/?x=journal&mode=item&id=142787
laughing about snowstorm that ur on xD about other we know why ban was there^^ dunno why ur putting this out while u had just to proove you have a brother.
No.
Well done! :)
show hidden textDidn't need aminute