Quality

by vaGgi • 12 Feb 2007, 17:13 • Journals
Tell me if you like that quality: http://rapidshare.com/files/16160162/190-fps-movie-rate-4000.avi

Let the flame begin!

Edit: Give some comments if you don't like anything.

image: yarrrlyxv4
Comments
44
▼
Deactivated6709 12 Feb 2007, 17:19
donno if its good or not...just simple dont like it :(
▼
vaGgi 12 Feb 2007, 17:20
what about the quality? i know that there is no editing :D i just captured some frag from several maps and i want you to say if the quality of this clip is good or not...so?
Parent
▼
Deactivated6709 12 Feb 2007, 17:35
well imo need sharper things xD
Parent
▼
stiff 12 Feb 2007, 17:19
Rapid share is wasting my time :<
▼
Grumly 12 Feb 2007, 17:20
donno if its good or not...just simple dont like it :(
▼
xfRd 12 Feb 2007, 17:25
it's to vage, quality is oke, just needs to be a bit sharper or smth imo. btw;
Rapid share is wasting my time :<
▼
vaGgi 12 Feb 2007, 17:55
ok i will try to sharpen it

thx for the 1st "non-retarded" comment <3 love ya
Parent
▼
xfRd 12 Feb 2007, 17:57
haha np :D
Parent
▼
rickZ 12 Feb 2007, 17:26
LOlDLLODL
▼
Slasheh 12 Feb 2007, 17:35
rapidshare is wasting everyone's time!
▼
ENSJQM 12 Feb 2007, 17:35
I dont like anything
▼
slifer 12 Feb 2007, 17:40
32 /kb/s gg
▼
Cardo 12 Feb 2007, 17:41
its not sharp enough for me.. and with this config ET just looks like a cartoon or something so small.
▼
ven0m 12 Feb 2007, 17:41
config could be better..
▼
perforator 12 Feb 2007, 17:47
rofl record on higher resolution / with more AA or whatever.. this looks pretty crap :p even for test!

nice framerate tho
▼
ven0m 12 Feb 2007, 17:47
AA baterij?
Parent
▼
vaGgi 12 Feb 2007, 17:50
like your toxic movie which was recorded on 856x480? (imo) :D

edit: anti-aliasing and everything is on highest settings
Parent
▼
perforator 12 Feb 2007, 18:23
toxic movie was recorded on 1200x668 ;p and that was my first try at moviemaking :p i know better now.

btw, the death's heads look so weird :/
Parent
▼
cointozz 12 Feb 2007, 17:54
nur 650 kb/s :<<<
EDIT:560 :<<
EDIT2: too blurry, supersample does not look too dense, font looks kinda blurred/bumpy/whatever
▼
vaGgi 12 Feb 2007, 17:56
:( low

wirst eh zu meckern haben

aber warum sagen eigentlich alle dass das zu unscharf ist? :( was schärferes gibts bei mir fast gar net
Parent
▼
cointozz 12 Feb 2007, 18:03
ich sag ja ned dass es kacke is, und das is auch kein meckern, es ist nur eine sammlung der punkte die mir negativ aufgefallen ist :o]

EDIT: naja wie pörfö schon sagt, ma mit höherer res recorden und vllt ma megui testen :p
Parent
▼
flame 12 Feb 2007, 17:56
180
obwohl ich 700 könnte :S
Parent
▼
vaGgi 12 Feb 2007, 17:57
Flame = on!

oh wie ich ironie liebe

:(
Parent
▼
flame 12 Feb 2007, 18:16
wenn das bild sich nicht bewegt is es sehr schaf usw. aber wenn es sich bewegt dann verschwimmt alles.
front ist auch doof :<
Parent
▼
cointozz 12 Feb 2007, 18:01
560
obwohl ich 1600 könnte
Parent
▼
ENSJQM 12 Feb 2007, 18:10
looks shit tbh :/
▼
Keytaro 12 Feb 2007, 18:16
Thats nice ! but nice full on oasis :<
▼
duNzy 12 Feb 2007, 18:24
noob hud
▼
bh_ 12 Feb 2007, 18:26
don´t like it :(
▼
altrnt 12 Feb 2007, 18:28
vagGi keep your own quality its just very nice to watch dunno why.
This sucks!
▼
slifer 12 Feb 2007, 18:34
kA was die alle mit unscharf reden ,ich finde das es scharf genug ist.


:)
▼
Mashed 12 Feb 2007, 18:42
s'nice :)
▼
ag0n 12 Feb 2007, 18:48
You can do much better....imo record @ r_mode 8 + 200 fps, then resize to your movie resolution + downsample to 30 fps @ vegas+ super ressample 8x, no ressample @ vegas + save as avi with hyuffv (all clips)

test imo

btw yes looks better (more smooth) that Allstars2 movie, but colors sux...
▼
hannes-` 12 Feb 2007, 18:51
why r_mode 8 and 200 fps?
Parent
▼
ag0n 12 Feb 2007, 18:54
dunno... but i tested and i like the quality / smooth / etc etc etc...

anyway i record @ r_mode 9 + 400 fps..., but dunno if he can record @r_mode 9
Parent
▼
hannes-` 12 Feb 2007, 18:58
again good to see u didnt understand at all ...
Parent
▼
altrnt 12 Feb 2007, 19:23
but he is able to fake ur movie config!
Parent
▼
PimpDaddy 13 Feb 2007, 02:26
Where is option ''resample''
Parent
▼
cheasy 12 Feb 2007, 18:51
ARGH MY EYES
▼
133_MHz 12 Feb 2007, 18:59
Ahahahaha
▼
Sgt.Pepper 12 Feb 2007, 19:15
nice quality
Back to top