EC/OC signup - rating 9/10
•
13 Mar 2007, 08:37
•
Journals
From the CB site :
Note: 10 being the best clan there is and 8 still being a European top clan.
It will be publicly viewable in the list of subscribed clans, so please be honest.
suXus esports 40 / 40 10
overdose gaming 18 / 18 9
clan west 3 / 3 9
Negative-image 15 / 15 9
elite 22 / 22 9
Impact Gaming 1 / 1 10
Team Exilium 17 / 15 9
Always funny to see the ratings that teams are giving themselves. I guess dignitas needs a rating of 12 then. Imo CB should punish liars by moving them to OC div. delta.
Well, at least I got smth to laugh about on my way to work ;)
Note: 10 being the best clan there is and 8 still being a European top clan.
It will be publicly viewable in the list of subscribed clans, so please be honest.
suXus esports 40 / 40 10
overdose gaming 18 / 18 9
clan west 3 / 3 9
Negative-image 15 / 15 9
elite 22 / 22 9
Impact Gaming 1 / 1 10
Team Exilium 17 / 15 9
Always funny to see the ratings that teams are giving themselves. I guess dignitas needs a rating of 12 then. Imo CB should punish liars by moving them to OC div. delta.
Well, at least I got smth to laugh about on my way to work ;)
But I don't think punishing them by moving them to 6rd division will be very popular by the 6st division teams ;)
Heck, we almost beat suXus, so we must be 9 :D But we're not, IMO :)
http://gravity.pri.ee/stats/2007-02-28-suXus_vs_.ALIS-frost_comp_b2-sw_goldrush_te.html
If we would have won goldrush, I also think we would have won radar.
That's all :)
And about suXus giving themselves a 10, it's because ClanBase blocked the way to EC twice for a lot of the players in the team, so they writed a 10 "to take no risks" ;p
For a better understanding - this should point out the ratings that are bullshit ;)
Impact Gaming 1 / 1 10 Only - 1 official played + 10 rating \o/
Besides, if they are considered to have a chance to beat dignitas, at least a 9 rating is in order. :)
And finally, let me quote: "Ratings are almost totally irrelevant for EC stuff."
ahhh..
impact gaming..
pfff..
thought a second u were talking about auxilia.. who actually have won all their 3 offis.. 3 aint aint much of course, but regarding matches and not playernames, we should be better ranked then impact..lol:D
dont think we can fool anyone in having 30 offis:D
but atleast we have done good in the offis we have played. And i do hope it will continue during ETmasters.
But i totaly agree that the only team who should be ranked 10 is dignitas. After that it should be 8 and 9 on the "next-best teams"... so we should have ranked us 8 or 9.. since we arent really dignitas.. (yet.::>>>)
dont worry decem, im sure that the cb admins know what they need to know about the teams they will give direct invite or qualifier match for EC.
and im sure its not how many offis they have stated on the CB site, or what rank they give themself that will be the reason for picking teams.
And only dignitas aka idle.ee is 10 ...
etc
EuroCup XIV
Amonekys
EuroCup XII
pokemoz
EuroCup XI
Saevus
hard but true
Clans are selected for EuroCup participation based on their stability (i.e. the ability to complete leagues) and their strength as proven by official match results (or the results of their players in other clans). Practice results are irrelevant
suck admins **** and ignore the rules again ?
by results or by .... ?
i dont want to play in 3weeks clan like you did
and call it skilled team.
Cause they played in last EC ?
Maybe a newcommer team can be better vs oldies ?
Etc Incomplete.
No EC players but what the hell they got at least 1 win in group stages/Amonkeys not. And they are still playng imo !
Sure newcommers can be better than oldies.
Incomplete has smth like 5 players that have played 3 years this game so i wouldnt take them as an example for being newcommers. Many of them has also played in the same clan before inc, if u didnt know that.
A-monkeys won one match and also lost one match in last EC and after we won our game we folded, if u didnt know that.
Inc doesnt play atm but they are starting to play again soon, if u didnt know that.
How can cb admins know is your clan good or bad ?
How can admins decide who are top players who not ...
So, a random team with 6 famous players forms about a month before EC. Noone has ever seen them play, yet they get to play EC based on names alone. During EC people get to see the team play for the first time, and the team gets raped by every other team in EC. Does that sound fair to you? I'd prefer seeing how good the team was before letting them play EC, instead of giving them an invite based on names.
Sure, you don't have to play officials to get into EC, but it would be helpfull.
You would prefer to see how good they are before letting them play in EC? You nor the people on xfire dont make that decision and that decision should be made by the players who play in the top competition level of ET, not those nub cb admins. Not every team with 6 famous players and 0 officials gets raped in EC but if the admins would ask the TOP-PLAYERS/TEAMS what they think about the invites EC could be nicer.
And you're right; you didn't say top players make a top team, eventhough that's still the general opinion.
I wouldnt see it to be fair if only top-teams had a change to say how this game should be played in competition level and how the game should evolve when there are thousands of other etplayers playing this game.
So who are you punishing here? The liars or the fair ones in div.delta ;-)
But darky,since 8 is still top european clan take a look on teams with rating 8. Do they deserve it? No.
70 Sainted 0 / 0 1 No
underrated!!