Karsiah_te

by SPU9 • 24 Mar 2007, 17:37 • Journals
image: karsiah_te

Okey,
I`ve done some 3v3 Karsiah Cups and now I want your Feedback in return ;)

Let me know what you think - Is the map suited for 3v3? Still FPS-Lags (if so post your system plz) - Bugs?

And I dont need your "we never ran throught the map but it sucks (cauz we lost our Match)"

Test the Map: 213.251.181.127:27970

thx ;)

and see ya on monday/tuesday with the 6v6 #ET-Cup !
gl&hf

btw: #newmaps.et - there are still some slots avi for tomorrows maptest!
Comments
18
▼
Sainted 24 Mar 2007, 17:37
not good in 3on3, axis need to offer at least one objective
some fps lag at different locations
▼
xety 24 Mar 2007, 17:38
i have played in the first cup and i cant image this map in 6-6.

first stage is a little bit easy for allies to capture flag, but atleast nice idea and nice fps :DDD
and to defend south is very hard for axis..... atleast its better not to defend it!
▼
superman 24 Mar 2007, 17:39
word nigga, allies 2 easy
Parent
▼
SPU9 24 Mar 2007, 17:41
the south docs are hard to defend in 3v3 - but you`ll have several opportunities to hold it in 6v6 mode

we`ll see how it`ll work in 6v6
Parent
▼
jaaN 24 Mar 2007, 17:38
good in 3o3 BAD in 6o6 RLY BAD !!! no bugs only at the long way from allies spawn there is 1 bug i think!
▼
taavid2a 24 Mar 2007, 17:40
good for 3on3 imo, prolly not for 6on6.

but wolken > karsiah
▼
crosby 24 Mar 2007, 17:40
map is too small for 6v6. In 3v3 it is good.
▼
Scarce 24 Mar 2007, 17:41
little bit fps lag (amd 3200+, radeon x800xt, 1gb ram). too bright imo, I wont change my cfg settings and I dont like those textures (sand etc.)

it's too small for 6on6

overall: 8/10

#2, wolken1_cpc is a fucking good map \o/
▼
SPU9 24 Mar 2007, 17:45
tax > all

I totally agree but you can get it if you run through left way->south->axisspawn and spawnrape 1 of them - here you go - nearly 30 secs to get it while they are 2 ;D
▼
miho 24 Mar 2007, 18:10
i think its a nice map for 3on3 but for 6on6 its abit too small imo.
▼
kiss 24 Mar 2007, 18:25
6o6 isnt rly a good id imo
▼
Spirea 24 Mar 2007, 18:40
I only tried some earlier version once as merc and spu raped us :(

well, the textures were oasis-like but I can bare that. It is surely better for 3on3. I don't think it would suit for 6on6.
And it's surely better than any rtcw map, so yeah it is nice, kkthx
▼
sHiZo 24 Mar 2007, 18:41
WOLKEN1_CPC > karsiah_te
▼
HellKn1ght 24 Mar 2007, 19:17
One thing I didn't like: I had some problems seeing the Allied Players. Can't remember if I had problems on Oasis, though.

About maps in general:
I'd love to see maps with the opportunity to chose at least 2 different spawnpoints. Like Radar =)
Many of you like spawnkilling, but I think it's bullshit. There's _NO_ skill involved and once you're cornered the match is as good as over. Goldrush/Supply...
▼
inflix8 24 Mar 2007, 19:25
good for 3on3 only thing is that axis spawn to often i the last defence
▼
Pasha 24 Mar 2007, 20:36
good 3on3 map, better then wolken, fun to play and fast to learn also.
▼
danL 25 Mar 2007, 01:04
it's nice for 3on3, and you can defend both docs for a while with a bit advanced tactics ( :P ), at least for a while, so it's not 100% north oriented (at least from what I've played)

didn't notice any major fps dropping places

only "bug" I've noticed is that you can get into the palm tree at north, and if you place yourself right you can't get hit in it while you can shoot @ opponent

and maybe on some places textures seem too bright, but that could only be the cfg
Back to top