eSports becomes a joke!
•
23 Apr 2007, 15:58
•
Journals
The major games played this year on a professional base:
ESWC 2007: (nothing special so far)
- Counter-Strike 1.6 (5on5)
- Quake 4 (1on1)
- Trackmania Nations (1on1)
- Warcraft III TFT (1on1)
WSVG 2007: (seemed like april fools)
- Guitar Hero II (1on1)
- World of Warcraft (3on3)
- Quake 4 (1on1)
- Fight Night Round III (1on1)
CPL 2007: (have a laugh)
- FEAR (xbox)
- World in Conflict (not released yet)
ESWC 2007: (nothing special so far)
- Counter-Strike 1.6 (5on5)
- Quake 4 (1on1)
- Trackmania Nations (1on1)
- Warcraft III TFT (1on1)
WSVG 2007: (seemed like april fools)
- Guitar Hero II (1on1)
- World of Warcraft (3on3)
- Quake 4 (1on1)
- Fight Night Round III (1on1)
CPL 2007: (have a laugh)
- FEAR (xbox)
- World in Conflict (not released yet)
dignitas/bozar (i think thats his name) is one of the big tm players as far as i know =]
but the other things are a joke
i know him cuz when i wanted to set up the cdap|devictus team, he wanted to trail "tomorrow i play the nc final and then i quit tm forever... tm is too easy game for me"
:D
and ET wasnt his game tbh :P
and it's free
LOL'D HARD :D:D:D:D:D
Honestly, do you believe that a nub could pick up FEAR or Guitar Hero and play it as well as someone who pracced 6 hours a day and was naturally talented (skilled) at it? Just because it's maybe looking for a different type of skill doesn't mean it isn't looking for it.
Logically, from the point of view of the game developers and sponsors, they want to see games that the viewing public (the spectators, who spend money on the sponsors' products and thus finance these events) can more easily relate to. Hence why the WSVG game list seems to make perfect sense to me, even if I don't like it.
The CPL list, however, gives the impression that (once again) the game publishers are pushing games that nobody really wants to play in competition at all for the sake of game sales rather than sponsors' merchandise - they're not even massively popular, afaik.This isn't the way things should be done, imo. It's self destructive in the long term as it doesn't allow a proper coherant spectator base for a given game to develop and, thus, precludes the CPL from taking advantage of that base in future events.
The ladder activity of BF2142 is about 0,2 matches a day. 20 teams in the infantery ladder. A conquest ladder which is the format BF is usually played does not even exist due to the low activity. Even BF2 has a more active community.
We'll see what the future brings BUT atm I think eSports will be destroyed by publishers wanting their new not even competion-ready games played instead of perfect online games such as CS, WC3, CoD and Quake...
Pokemon tbfh
im a carebear!
wow 3on3 .. pls like i want to see that nerds on a big lan :s
lol ^^