The Eurocup

im gay

same here

thats the reason why i simply wrote "first" :DDDDDD

ahhaha ;D

I thought the same ^^

agree :o

http://tinyurl.com/33h8fu

Google found the beginning word to word

explain pls!!!

no you aren't ;p

it's made with "Automatic complaint-letter generator"

It used to be frustrating. Then sad. Now it's just plain funny. Every time crossfire tries to use rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished, like clockwork, its cheerleaders defend that sort of daft, heartless behavior. Here's the story: I stand by what I've written before, that I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But all it really wants is to hang onto the perks it's getting from the system. That's all it really cares about.

It may be coincidence that crossfire's memoranda change the course of history. It may be coincidence that they wiretap all of our telephones and computers. And it may be coincidence that they undermine liberty in the name of liberty. But that's a lot of coincidence! I use such language purposefully -- and somewhat sardonically -- to illustrate how if you were to try to tell crossfire's votaries that scrutinizing its pleas may be instructive in this regard, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that crossfire has recently been going around claiming that it should be a given a direct pipeline to the National Treasury. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. Crossfire's musings are like an enormous radicalism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must build bridges where in the past all that existed were moats and drawbridges, because crossfire has inherited the whole of its little stock of phrases and notions, which it is pleased to call "ideas", from unforgiving, obtrusive exhibitionists. No joke.

Crossfire maliciously defames and damagingly misrepresents everyone and everything around it. There's a word for that: libel. It's precisely because comments like that don't sit well with stuck-up quiddlers that you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: Relative to just a few years ago, perverted, satanic fiends of one sort or another are nearly ten times as likely to believe that the ancient Egyptians used psychic powers to build the pyramids. This is neither a coincidence nor simply a sign of the times. Rather, it reflects a sophisticated, psychological warfare program designed by crossfire to leave behind a legacy of perpetual indebtedness in developing countries. Crossfire's commentaries are intended to get us all on board the Pyrrhonism train, and that's one reason why I'm writing this letter. Not that I ever believed crossfire's lies, but at least before they had some kind of internal consistency -- a logic, albeit twisted, that invited refutation. But now, it seems it is desperately flailing about for any pretext, no matter how ludicrous or slight, to use terms of opprobrium such as "gutless gutter-dwellers" and "hopeless, loathsome reprobates" to castigate whomever it opposes. I've said this before, and I'll say it again, but even if one is opposed to nugatory careerism (and I am), then surely, if crossfire gets its way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of mandarinism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that it is difficult for many people to accept that all of the anxious sighing, longing, and hoping of its heart is directed to a time when impractical vagabonds can crush any semblance of opposition to its parasitic teachings. If you don't believe me, see for yourself.

This is well illustrated in what remains one of the most divisive issues of our day: simplism. Crossfire, you are welcome to get off my back this time and stay off. As amazing as it seems, crossfire has been known to say that everyone who doesn't share its beliefs is an impetuous spieler deserving of death and damnation. That notion is so impudent, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. I feel no shame in writing that we cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must show you, as dispassionately as possible, what kind of quasi-insincere thoughts crossfire is thinking about these days. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that crossfire's vaporings make many mainstream drug addicts nervous. That's pretty transparent. What's not so transparent is the answer to the following question: Why can't we all just get along? A clue might be that crossfire is an inspiration to anal-retentive scamps everywhere. They panegyrize its crusade to promote group-think attitudes over individual insights and, more importantly, they don't realize that we must reveal the truth about crossfire's effusions. Only then can a society free of its clueless ideas blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, its agents provocateurs don't really care that the really interesting thing about all this is not that people should soothe each other's pain, not exploit it. The interesting thing is that there are many roads leading to the defeat of its plans to convict me without trial, jury, or reading one complete paragraph of this letter. I claim that all of these roads must eventually pass through the same set of gates: the ability to lend a helping hand. What we have been imparting to crossfire -- or what it has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge.

If crossfire is going to talk about higher standards, then it needs to live by those higher standards. If we don't remove the crossfire threat now, it will bite us in our backside quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "counterrevolutionize". I, speaking as someone who is not a frowzy, psychotic dysfunctional-type, will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to get the facts out in the hope that somebody else will do something to solve the problem. Crossfire has no sense of personal boundaries, right? Right.

As someone who is working hard to help people see crossfire's obscene, imperious cop-outs for what they are, I must point out that one could truthfully say that this has been documented repeatedly. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that today, we might have let it impinge upon our daily lives. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will eschew intransigent revanchism. I wish I could say this nicely, but I don't have much tolerance for chthonic hippies: Crossfire constantly insists that honor counts for nothing. But it contradicts itself when it says that it is entitled to create widespread psychological suffering. The outcome of the struggle will ultimately be decided based on the number and influence of people fully informed about crossfire's epigrams, committed to crossfire's defeat, and organized under sound leadership, which is another way of saying that crossfire has a blatant disregard for society's basic laws. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to it. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll find that crossfire doesn't want us to know about its plans to perpetuate myths that glorify onanism. Otherwise, we might do something about that.

I have frequently criticized crossfire's unspoken plan to compromise the free and open nature of public discourse. It usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of neocolonialism, nativism, child molestation, and halitosis. Crossfire hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that the time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must expand people's understanding of crossfire's drugged-out holier-than-thou attitudes. The first step in that process is to realize that it may have access to weapons of mass destruction. Then again, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, consider crossfire to be a weapon of mass destruction itself. Crossfire's machinations are so crotchety that if allowed to go unanswered, their final cost would be incalculable. Crossfire's comment that it is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. Not only did all of us misfortunate enough to have to listen to it make that comment become dumber as a result but I insist that a lot more people now understand why I contend that even when crossfire isn't lying, it's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable it to waste hours and hours in fruitless conferences and meetings.

I undoubtedly doubt we could beat this into crossfire's head, but I am intellectually honest enough to admit my own previous ignorance in that matter. I only wish that crossfire had the same intellectual honesty. As one commentator put it, crossfire has announced its intentions to curry favor with brutish, indecent vagrants using a barrage of flattery, especially recognition of their "value", their "importance", their "educational mission", and other villainous nonsense. While doing so may earn crossfire a gold star from the mush-for-brains mercantalism crowd, a leopard can't change its spots. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue here: its soulless solutions. According to crossfire, the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. It might as well be reading tea leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's true and what isn't. Maybe then crossfire would realize that I have one itsy-bitsy problem with its publicity stunts. Videlicet, they perpetrate acts of the most misinformed character. And that's saying nothing about how it commonly appoints ineffective people to important positions. It then ensures that these people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for it to present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about its undertakings.

Crossfire keeps trying to replace law and order with anarchy and despotism. And if we don't remain eternally vigilant, it will clearly succeed. No one that I speak with or correspond with is happy about this situation. Of course, I don't speak or correspond with money-grubbing paranoiacs, crossfire's shills, or anyone else who fails to realize that I really wouldn't want to convert houses of worship into houses of nihilism. I would, on the other hand, love to present another paradigm in opposition to crossfire's inane causeries. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. As we organize our campaigns against unenlightened, scummy criticasters and formulate responses to their rhetoric, it is critical that we encourage open, civic engagement. To say otherwise would be damnable. Crossfire broadens its appeal by seeking influence and adherents in the Marxism movement. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: It is morally unjustifiable for it to blend together paternalism and allotheism in a train wreck of monumental proportions.

By the bye, "parallelogrammatical" is sometimes narrowly defined by subversive scoundrels. Or, to express that sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, if I am correctly informed, given the public appetite for more accountability, everything crossfire tells you is a lie. In any case, its desire to interfere with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights is the chief sign that it's a delirious maniac. (The second sign is that crossfire feels obliged to foist the most poisonously false and destructive myths imaginable upon us.) It's not just the lunatic fringe that's in crossfire's corner; a number of previously respectable people have begun backing it. Crossfire has stated that namby-pamby clunks should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers. One clear inference from that statement -- an inference that is never really disavowed -- is that it has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. Now that's just pudibund. The only weapons crossfire has in its intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all it has, and it knows it. Although only viperine egotists are capable of imagining that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior, we are here to gain our voice in this world, and whether or not crossfire approves, we will continue to be heard.