copperhead or diamondback?

by smu • 30 May 2007, 17:37 • Journals
will buy a new mouse
diamondback looks better imo, so i want to buy it. but are there any other diffrences beetween them?
Comments
24
▼
chronos_ 30 May 2007, 18:38
deathadder!
▼
Pieface 30 May 2007, 18:39
diamondback ftw
▼
Worm! 30 May 2007, 18:39
<- copperhead, and no complaints about it yet
▼
huumeantti 30 May 2007, 18:41
buy deathadder
▼
neve 30 May 2007, 18:42
omg why razer??
▼
saKen 30 May 2007, 18:44
diamondback works fine
▼
Deactivated3035 30 May 2007, 18:50
you should buy it then
Parent
▼
saKen 30 May 2007, 19:05
Why? I already have 2.
Parent
▼
Deactivated3035 30 May 2007, 19:45
those must be broken ones then...
Parent
▼
saKen 30 May 2007, 19:56
Nope, never had any problems with them.
Parent
▼
InterFace 30 May 2007, 18:46
1) diamondback is old but ok
2) copperhead costs much and is crap . allmost unusable for lowsens players
3) for same money - get a Razer DeathAdder , best mouse at market atm :)
▼
psiquh 30 May 2007, 18:48
copperhead ufjden
▼
jackoff 30 May 2007, 19:02
Does it matter to you?
Parent
▼
Pr0mo 30 May 2007, 19:04
buy a DeathAdder
▼
crook 30 May 2007, 19:35
wheres deathadder in the list,??
▼
Chigoami 30 May 2007, 19:56
copperhead too much neg. accel when lowsensing imo
▼
StrAf 30 May 2007, 19:58
mx518or g5 .die razer!
▼
Steven Seagal 30 May 2007, 20:02
copperhead is good for my high sens
Back to top