discuss this!!!!!

by woot • 2 Jun 2007, 17:04 • Journals
High sense <> low sense

high detailed cfg <> low detailed cfg
Comments
37
▼
nuNca 2 Jun 2007, 18:05
both medium

medium sense
medium graphics
▼
vaGgi 2 Jun 2007, 18:07
just what i thought :DD
Parent
▼
sHiZo 2 Jun 2007, 18:05
high sense > low sense
high cfg < low cfg
▼
Gnomie 2 Jun 2007, 18:05
high sens > low sense
High detail > low detail
▼
blitzz 2 Jun 2007, 18:05
0.76 sens @ cooperhead
▼
ins 2 Jun 2007, 18:06
Low sense.

Medium detailed cfg.
▼
schNee 2 Jun 2007, 18:07
medium

btw what is low? until which sense?? me use 1,5 - 1,9
▼
pala 2 Jun 2007, 18:36
depends on your hz & windows sens tought
Parent
▼
schNee 2 Jun 2007, 18:50
windows sense 5,5/500hz/1600dpi
Parent
▼
pala 2 Jun 2007, 20:00
high id say
Parent
▼
schNee 2 Jun 2007, 20:03
hmm most say if they spec me im lowsenser, but these r the best settings for me atm. tried a lot..
Parent
▼
roYal 2 Jun 2007, 18:08
low sense ftw

i need 40cm for 180°
▼
Spirea 2 Jun 2007, 18:10
I call myself lowsenser although I got almost twice your sens :D


about topic, low is better in both categories
Parent
▼
xfRd 2 Jun 2007, 18:21
agree with the low cfg stuff but if you get reaped it sucks having low sens :<
Parent
▼
Spirea 3 Jun 2007, 18:09
just aim with your hand not with your wrist
Parent
▼
slajdan 2 Jun 2007, 18:24
if you can do a 360 on your mousepad then your a mid senser, more = high senser
Parent
▼
crook 2 Jun 2007, 19:17
till like 450degrees over 30cm, ur still medium sens imo
Parent
▼
slajdan 2 Jun 2007, 21:02
i would call that high/vhigh sens :-P
Parent
▼
Spirea 3 Jun 2007, 18:10
I can make 300 degrees on 40cm mousepad, so I'm still lowsenser, right?
Parent
▼
slajdan 3 Jun 2007, 18:32
yeah, your free to go.
Parent
▼
ReZoN 2 Jun 2007, 18:09
< ! mid sens tbh
< !
▼
Fex 2 Jun 2007, 18:09
sens: different for everyone
config: I prefer a high resolution with a sucky quality(rivatuner style)
▼
raki 2 Jun 2007, 18:10
my sens and my config
▼
likan 2 Jun 2007, 18:10
sens 1.2 - 1.7 imo
and low detail (FPS ftw)
▼
xfRd 2 Jun 2007, 18:19
saying a random sens is useless... sens 1.7 could be incredibly fast for me and extremely low for you, depends on "external" programs like razer/setpoint and ofc. windows sens which has a great influence on the game sens aswell. I think that as long as there is no accel. involved the best way to consider someone as high/low sens is to look at the amount of cm necessary for 360 degrees.
Parent
▼
.Madness! 2 Jun 2007, 18:11
uberlow > all
▼
beAsty 2 Jun 2007, 18:12
both low
▼
Deactivated3050 2 Jun 2007, 18:17
etBot.v3.85(P).winXP.rar
▼
vaGgi 2 Jun 2007, 18:20
i will reply with a classic comment:

"orly?"
Parent
▼
lagg3r 2 Jun 2007, 18:27
Low sense.

Medium detailed cfg.
▼
hambapasta 2 Jun 2007, 18:36
medium medium
▼
nohitz 2 Jun 2007, 18:58
med sens
low graphics
▼
crook 2 Jun 2007, 19:15
med sens, med m_pitch, med fov, med gfx
Back to top