ETQW - test of time

by Shakes • 9 Aug 2007, 13:25 • Journals
Read the following in this interview:
QuoteWe did some new stuff with ET:QW on a testing perspective, with a private beta all through the summer and then going larger with a public beta. We gave some teams like Team HOT and 20id as they came to a press event earlier this year in Los Angeles. We've gotten a lot of feedback from them as they've been in on the beta. We want to involve the professional players, especially if we want a game that's going to last, stand the test of time, and not be tweaked so much after its release.


I think even the players they talk about (HOT 20ID) who supposedly gave input to make sure the game doesn't need much tweaking agree a lot has to be tweaked!

Ow, as they did in Enemy Territory they once again included the worst map ever in their beta/demo. Valley is just horrible unless you like spam.
Comments
9
▼
pedro 9 Aug 2007, 14:27
We're ET players, of course we like spam.
▼
moutoul 9 Aug 2007, 14:33
"Ow, as they did in Enemy Territory they once again included the worst map ever in their beta/demo. Valley is just horrible unless you like spam."

I am not really involved in ET QW appart from playing it on a pub a couple of times, i just checked a bit of D vs HOT and they were trying to fix a bridge in order to move a vehicle trough a tunnel, it brought me back 4 years earlier playing fueldump and trying to fix the damn bridge against a mortar 2 pf and a sniper ..... i guess it will be exactly like ET, you ll need to wait 2 years before the game will be fun to play :(
▼
Shakes 9 Aug 2007, 14:43
That was my point indeed. In ET they included Fueldump, now Valley. Horrible maps. Someone should send them to some marketing classes.
Parent
▼
Domi 9 Aug 2007, 15:08
why u dislike fueldump? its a better map as supply or oasis or battey or or or or
Parent
▼
Shakes 9 Aug 2007, 16:50
You, sir, are clueless.
Parent
▼
wipeout 9 Aug 2007, 16:27
The best about the game are the bots. Great work!
Back to top