295th picture

by Nonix • 24 Aug 2007, 20:06 • Journals
Hello!
I tried to use this wrap, but after a few time a gave up because it stops at the 295th picture.

I use this cfg:
;bgcol=0.0,1.0,0.0
merge=34
skip=0
weights=1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10
basepath=etpro\screenshots
crop_top=0
crop_bottom=0


I used the 0.60 version and after I tried the 0.62 but still...
I tried with MovieMakersHack as well...

btw 10000/32=294,117 <-- so i still have the limit imo but i dont know why : /
Please give some help .
Comments
42
▼
Reni 24 Aug 2007, 21:07
1st
▼
Nonix 24 Aug 2007, 21:07
son of a
Parent
▼
reAz 24 Aug 2007, 21:08
mother ?
Parent
▼
Nonix 24 Aug 2007, 21:10
almost
Parent
▼
mythos 24 Aug 2007, 21:11
son of a similar, never heard before tbh
Parent
▼
Nonix 24 Aug 2007, 21:16
i couldnt finish my sentence : o
Parent
▼
OVER9000BPM 24 Aug 2007, 21:08
Hi Nonix, iam the guy you like so much!
▼
Nonix 24 Aug 2007, 21:10
who are you ?
Parent
▼
mythos 24 Aug 2007, 21:10
Hi Nonix, iam the guy you like so much!
Parent
▼
OVER9000BPM 24 Aug 2007, 21:13
you made a journal about how retarded iam.
Parent
▼
Malak 24 Aug 2007, 21:16
the one who hates nazis and racists
booowaa!
Parent
▼
ag0n 24 Aug 2007, 21:11
Im using 0.62 and it stoped at 2000 screens. I will try right now with moviemakers hack.

Anyway i dont get the point of merge 34 screens. It means u will get 29.41 fps output. 29.41 fps is not enough for change speed of cams/frags, because u will get blurry pics after. Im using 200 fps output (merge = 5 , 1000/5 = 200)
▼
Ruipperi 24 Aug 2007, 21:16
idiot please
Parent
▼
Nonix 24 Aug 2007, 21:18
It's easy to call someone idiot and dont write a constructive comment.
Parent
▼
julianK<3foonr 24 Aug 2007, 21:21
dont blame him, its his birthday, he can bullshit around as much as he wants today
Parent
▼
Nonix 24 Aug 2007, 21:23
I am waiting for my birthday to kill ppl !
Parent
▼
julianK<3foonr 24 Aug 2007, 21:25
whats with your bad mood today :< u make little julian scared!
Parent
▼
Nonix 24 Aug 2007, 21:26
I am not in bad mood : D
I just wanted to show call someone idiot doesnt metter on timing
Parent
▼
Ruipperi 24 Aug 2007, 21:27
i already told him msn before but seems kinda useless since he didnt understand anything what i said. :/

so i think i can call him idiot :<
Parent
▼
ag0n 24 Aug 2007, 21:29
like what? then correct my self. Or try by your own hands speed up 30 fps output (your case is diference since u use a playback rate trick which give u normal speed), but in nonix config he cant speed up because he gets blurry screens.

Test and take your own conclusions.


A good example of 30 fps + speed is QkR the movie... check the supply kills.. there is one at cp.. i changed the speed it becomes rly blurry... then max explained me why it becomes blurry... because i was editing 30 fps files
Parent
▼
Ruipperi 24 Aug 2007, 21:38
30fps is not timescale 1 so its already retarded to even try to make movie with it. btw we were talking about you not nonix.
Parent
▼
ag0n 24 Aug 2007, 21:42
omg.. when i talk about 30 fps i mean +/- 30... 29.41 and 30 is not soo diferent and the problem of speed up + blurry keeps the same

but i rly dont know why u called me idiot since u know that im not going to use 30 fps or 29.41 or wtv... im using 200 fps output as u know... soo, i dont get this kind of problems (my timescale is 1 and i can speed up how much as i want)
Parent
▼
Ruipperi 24 Aug 2007, 21:48
... then say the fps what you mean and not some retarded one... there is big difference between using 29,970 or 29.412 or 30 or 31,25 etc
Parent
▼
ag0n 24 Aug 2007, 21:51
yeah, but im talking about low fps + change speed.... i could even talk about 50 fps + change speed.. u will everytime get blurry screens when u change speed with low fps files. Less that 100 fps suchs (if u wanna change the speed).

Try by yourself... cl_avidemo 30 (or 29.41, rofl) and then change speed to 150 or 170 at vegas... then record with cl_avidemo 200 and change speed to 150 or 170 and compare the image :)

is just a question of test.. i tested and im sure of what im talking about.
Parent
▼
Ruipperi 24 Aug 2007, 21:59
still there is difference between avidemo 30 and avidemo 29,412... if you do avidemo 30 -> it wont be 30 since its not one of the magifps numbers of q3-engine.

QuoteTry by yourself... cl_avidemo 30 (or 29.41, rofl) and then change speed to 150 or 170 at vegas... then record with cl_avidemo 200 and change speed to 150 or 170 and compare the image :)


give me images/clips and ill tell whats the problem there is.. i mean, if there is one? Because i dont get your point and i have no idea where youre going with this, so its hard to talk about this. Though i dont even understand why would you like to do "avidemo 30(or 29.41, rofl)" or "avidemo 200" and then change the speed to 150 or 170. Also if youre using "its a wrap" remmeber that your screenshots are already resampled.
Parent
▼
ag0n 24 Aug 2007, 22:15
i dont have this test clips atm, but i will record some later. I took cl_avidemo as example. with or without wrap, the problem keeps the same. U have 30 fps only (blurry or not u have only this). well, if u doubt about this, ask fei (he could record only 30 fps output with q3mme, but he use 200 or more fps..) or max
Parent
▼
Ruipperi 24 Aug 2007, 22:25
i still cant see your point. but what if you have this ~30fps clip and its timescale 0.5?
Parent
▼
ag0n 24 Aug 2007, 22:27
as i said dunno about your specific case (u use a playback rate trick) because i havent tested such stuff... maybe as -max- he is more experienced...
Parent
▼
Ruipperi 24 Aug 2007, 22:29
what is playback rate trick stuff? :f
Parent
▼
ag0n 24 Aug 2007, 22:30
change playback ratio to 2 or use 200 velocity is the same thing .
Parent
▼
Ruipperi 24 Aug 2007, 22:34
its not the same thing but still whats wrong with it? o_O
Parent
▼
Deactivated5924 24 Aug 2007, 21:24
It still has a limit, yes, but MMHack should fix that :o
▼
Nonix 24 Aug 2007, 21:25
should, should, but still limited with MMhack too :o
Parent
▼
Nonix 24 Aug 2007, 21:36
merge=20
skip=20
weights=1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1

what was your limit with this ? 500 scrrens ?
Parent
▼
Deactivated5924 24 Aug 2007, 21:38
I use MMHack, no limit.. well, i think it's somewhere @ 60 000
Parent
▼
Nonix 24 Aug 2007, 21:40
I had limit , but i test again : /
Parent
▼
Ruipperi 24 Aug 2007, 21:52
limit goes like, without mmhack its 9999 normal tga's (not blurred) with mmhack the limit is something like 64000 (again normal not blurred ones)
im too lazy to do the math how much you would get screens with different avidemo, but i think you understand it yourself.
Parent
▼
Bitmap 25 Aug 2007, 16:50
Limit without MMHack = 10000 / (merge + skip) = 10000 / (20+20) = 250
Parent
▼
tapsadontbanplz 24 Aug 2007, 21:57
merge 34, skip 0, some weights u likes and start ET via mmhack

u can get ~65000 original screens with mmhack so blurred screens like
~65000:34=~1911
Back to top