Ubuntu?
•
30 Aug 2007, 19:25
•
Journals
i was wondering why ppl would like to use linux's ubuntu instead of windows xp?
what are the advantages and for who is it meant? With "for who is it meant" i mean that i always concidered xp as an os that is best for a normal user, that mac osx is destined to be used by graphical designers and afaik linux is meant to be used by programmers...is this true?
If you are a linux user, why did u went from windows to linux and visa versa, if u are a windows user...why don't you concider using ubuntu?
The reason why i'm asking is because i'm getting a crapy laptop from my brother because he is getting a new one and i am thinking of putting linux's ubuntu on it or maybe both ubuntu and windows xp...
thx in advance! :)
what are the advantages and for who is it meant? With "for who is it meant" i mean that i always concidered xp as an os that is best for a normal user, that mac osx is destined to be used by graphical designers and afaik linux is meant to be used by programmers...is this true?
If you are a linux user, why did u went from windows to linux and visa versa, if u are a windows user...why don't you concider using ubuntu?
The reason why i'm asking is because i'm getting a crapy laptop from my brother because he is getting a new one and i am thinking of putting linux's ubuntu on it or maybe both ubuntu and windows xp...
thx in advance! :)
Most ppl use Windows , never had linux , but i heard Linux is more stable than Windows (thats why most ET servers are Linux i think)
Linux = better server support and stuff
because windows machine's get infected easy with viruses
Windows XP is really great atm more stable then ubuntu
more then 80% of the users use WINXP and are noobs
linux users are Tweakers / geeks / hobbyists mostly
www.ubuntu.com and read the forums
its really simple
and i also dont know shit about programming so np
Windows XP might be more stable than some unstable distros, or if you use the unstable tree, but linux, and even ubuntu as a whole, is a LOT more stable than windows could ever dream to be.
Run a linux box for a month and a windows xp box for a month, then compare the stats, open a game and check the FPS.
Not to mention linux is far easier to use than windows, but w/e.
GFG.
my fucking Xorg crashed all the time after an game
maybe it's because of mine ATi card i dont know but still i like windows more atm
Windows XP SP2 = stable got the same installation for about an year now my fps still didnt drop
anyways linux is easier to use if all the drivers exist
and now stop bashing me
<3 MICROSOFT
show hidden text dont kill me pls
Number of times Mac OS X has crashed for me the past year: 0
Number of times Gentoo Linux has crashed for me the past year: 0
than*
Oh and you actually inversed the order of the words Windows XP and ubuntu in your sentence :)
KDE/GNOME/FLUXBOX > EXPLORER.EXE
the port is called blackbox, and there is multiple versions of it, i'm using "bbClean"
It replaces the shell, so no more explorer needed! Plus it owns!
Linux = Not Rebooting after installing something
Linux = Compiz-Fusion (3D Cube stuff)
Linux = No Virusses (Because of sudo/su, only VERY dumb users will get virusses on Ubuntu)
Also first releases are mostly for windows
No viruses is part of stability :)
MS is working hard for security updates
SP3 coming up for XP :)
Linux is best for servers imo
One simple example. There are two very popular window managers (by choosing ubuntu you automatically choose gnome, but there's kubuntu with kde as well), and you can use whichever you like best. You decide.
You can also decide which distribution to choose (which one suits you best?) and even whether to install your programs from sources or from precompiled binaries.
To move on, someone with better computer skills, has great benefit from the very things that scare away newbies: configuration files and the command line. Linux basically revolves around scripts, and scripts are extremely powerful. Everything is configurable, and there might also be more than one way of doing it. In addition to that, the command line allows you to do what you want (if you know how) a lot faster than click-ing your way around.
Let's now consider another approach. Governments and agencies started making their switch to linux and open formats. Considering MS Office vs Open Office. If someone keeps all it's documents in a closed format (like .doc from MS Word), it means it puts a great deal of trust into the owner of the format. If Microsoft decides not to support the old format anymore, all your documents are doomed (ofc, in this case you will have the chance of converting them). If however you use an open format, with all the specifications made public, there will always be support for it somewhere on the internet (maybe even older versions: you can find Apache 1.0 out there, but can you find Microsoft Office 6.0? )
Update 1:
And most the software you'll ever need is compiled into one big list with nice descriptions, and you can download and install it with less than 3 clicks.
Edit: It's been an age, this might actually work nowadays: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/installer/
KDE is cluttered to hell.
Gnome is made for noobs.
The main problem with Linux as a desktop OS outlined. You have the power those choose which crappy program you want to use. Plus, don't even get me started on all the cheap carbon copy programs like OO.o and GIMP. :x
Disclaimer: This comment was written by a MS/Apple-fanboy.
Doesn't matter, it's a matter of preference.
OO.o is a bad carbon copy of an older version of Office, bad because it doesn't do anything better than Office.
If I want to do some schoolwork I'll open InDesign or Notepad2 over MS Word or OO Word.
The only program I have used is OO Spreadsheet, because sometimes it's needed, sometimes it's useful.
ps: Linux? Can't exactly call it a good Office suite if it's only supported on one platform well, and another platform gets a shitty port. (Have you ever used MS Office on mac?)
But it was very fun to play around with.
I mostly use Ubuntu for office applications and such (had ET installed on it at one time but experienced difficulties with the keyboard functionality, unfortunately). I like to use Ubuntu for a variety of reasons: it features easy package management that allows you to download and install a lot of free programs painlessly, all the drivers for my hardware are installed at the same time as the operating system (I think I'm fortunate not to have experienced any problems in this regard), and it comes with a wide range of useful programs pre-installed (e.g. Firefox, OpenOffice, GIMP (graphics application), Evolution (for e-mails), Rhythmbox (for managing music, podcasts and such)).
Speaking as someone relatively new to Linux, I consider Ubuntu a pretty good alternative to XP if you aren't very dependent on software designed exclusively for XP/Mac (though it is possible to achieve support for such applications through an API called "Wine", but not always with perfect compatibility).
If you are lucky, you are quickly up and running after you've installed Ubuntu, and if not, support is widely available on the web since it is such a popular distribution, so a transition from XP to Ubuntu should be relatively painless.
I currently have Ubuntu 7.04 installed on both my desktop (dual boot) and my laptop, and I am very satisfied with how it runs (although I have experienced some difficulty with the touch pad functionality on my laptop (it worked fine, but I found it hard to configure to my liking)).