pb bans

VIOLATION (MULTIHACK) #70473

so which one is it? can't find it anywhere on the webz and a lot of people seem to get busted with it today :D
Comments
19
eth32 v0.7 or v0.71
and you are basing that on..? :P
Parent
I'm basing that on all the cheaters whining on the eth32 forums That they are getting kicked for multihack + it's by far the most popular cheat at the moment. No other publicly available cheat could result in so many PB bans. Oh and also because most of the guys that got PB banned for it are / were nexus users.
Parent
so busted meight
Parent
hjaha! i didnt get busted by that, so .... :<
Parent
pssh, nexus 0.2
Parent
Considered that but I don't believe so many people still use that one.
Parent
read again and then silently delete your comment, because it makes no sense at all :)
Definitely!
Is it true that if you rename your config to etbot.cfg yawn says hello hello and gives you some red marks?
The MD5 tool can be configured to detect the presence (or absence!) of files with specific names, and then it doesn't care about the content.

Server with this specific MD5 check + server streaming to pbbans.com = will show up on Yawn.
Parent
yawn will only show those red marks if you get banned on a PsB or PBBans streaming server.
Parent
so he actually cheated, and his story about 'i renamed my config to etbot.cfg and that's why i got those red warnings' is bullshit?
Parent
Not necessarily, what Bitmap.se said is (sorta) correct.
Parent
Easy , just dont run WMP with ET :o
Back to top