The ET:QW Demo: Opinions lol ><

by Fraggle • 10 Sep 2007, 20:32 • Journals
For all who have played the demo/beta. Do you like it ? Are you going to buy it.

My first ompression of the demo was: I didnt get a shit from it :< Dont know yet
Comments
41
▼
dITRqLmaN 10 Sep 2007, 21:32
dont laik it.
▼
lahq 10 Sep 2007, 21:36
nice spammer
Parent
▼
dITRqLmaN 10 Sep 2007, 21:36
geh arbeiten.
Parent
▼
lahq 10 Sep 2007, 21:37
hartz 4 :[
Parent
▼
dITRqLmaN 10 Sep 2007, 21:37
ké, same here. ts!
Parent
▼
lahq 10 Sep 2007, 21:38
watching tv soon und so :o
Parent
▼
dITRqLmaN 10 Sep 2007, 21:39
ah k hf und so o:
Parent
▼
Lightning 10 Sep 2007, 21:33
:(
▼
schNee 10 Sep 2007, 21:58
hi daddy!! sup? :D
Parent
▼
Lightning 10 Sep 2007, 22:06
Beeing a sad panda :( , sup 2 you?
Parent
▼
schNee 10 Sep 2007, 22:09
listening nice music. sad, why? :(
Parent
▼
Lightning 10 Sep 2007, 22:10
ETQW :(, Needing one player for the team :(, Wanna trial for it? or mix :)
Parent
▼
schNee 10 Sep 2007, 22:12
my pc is too slow and me dont like it. sry... gl !!
Parent
▼
Lightning 10 Sep 2007, 22:14
nice excuses :(, wanna be mascott? :)
Parent
▼
Juize 10 Sep 2007, 21:34
nothing can beat ET :'(
▼
dohfOs 10 Sep 2007, 21:36
give it time. at first. i didn't like it either, now i do. but the demo map suck donkey balls and is hopefully one of the worst (especially looking at it as a competitive map) there is in this game. too many vehicles and all that.

anyways, yes. i'm def. gonna buy the full game :)
▼
quasimoto 10 Sep 2007, 21:39
looks nice but my pc died after 10 mins
▼
Deactivated5821 10 Sep 2007, 21:40
1. aiming feels like its smoothened. dont feel like i have total control.
2. dont really like the future theme
3. dont understand anything bout maps/objectives
4. who is enemy? ah the red icon! dead
5. vehicles. i like them in ut style, not this one. but limited might be ok
6. gfx engine improved a lot (still sux tho)
7. feels slow
▼
Splodge 10 Sep 2007, 21:44
I agree aiming feels a lot smoother now. Also it feels slow compared to ET, but I think they increased the game speed slightly after the Battlefield players requested it to be slowed down and ET Players asked for it to be quicker.
Parent
▼
Deactivated5821 10 Sep 2007, 21:54
true.
but i still think the crosshair doesnt react exact. feels like a mousefilter (smoothing)
Parent
▼
dohfOs 10 Sep 2007, 22:57
you will learn all of that in time. everything just comes after awhile and u won't have any problems with who's beeing the enemy and who's being your friend or wtf_is_this_objective_about.

all the vehicles sucks yeah. but it will be restricted for competitive play so no worries :)
Parent
▼
Deactivated5821 11 Sep 2007, 09:13
i think id need someone to teach me :D
but dno if i will like qw then
Parent
▼
dohfOs 11 Sep 2007, 13:17
nah :) easiest thing to do is just look at what the objectives are in the (L)imbo menu. and pick the class with the star (the one "most" needed for w/e stage you're on). on gdf it's engy for constructing the bridge, engy for keeping the mcp repaired, cov op to hack the thingy and finally soldier to blow up the contaminator. meanwhile u can still do side-objectives (like capturing the forward spawns with w/e class). as gdf engineer u can also build some guard towards that are situated every her and there.

as strogg it doesn't really matter. but i'd suggest pretty much w/e when defending the bridge. engy (placing an avt or apt) on the 2nd stage. engy on the 3rd aswell for an apt/avt and place mines (remember to activate them with your repair tool) on the hack thing. and engy for disarming any bombs planted on objetive 4. and u can ofc do side-objectives as strogg aswell. taking back the gdf's forward spawns and such.

either u do that. or u just pick soldier/aggressor and go rambo with your lacerator/ar and learn how to aim in etqw.

takes a day or two - then you should start getting a hang of it :)
Parent
▼
Deactivated5821 11 Sep 2007, 13:43
thanks very much.
i ran around this morning building bridge etc in "singleplayer".
Parent
▼
Lover 10 Sep 2007, 21:41
not yet :>
▼
GoGetEmTiger 10 Sep 2007, 21:49
it sux
it will never be better than ET im waiting forward to RTCW2 :<
▼
Sainted 10 Sep 2007, 21:52
nice not having played it
Parent
▼
danL 10 Sep 2007, 21:57
if it's relatively same as the beta, I'm with that guy
Parent
▼
Sainted 10 Sep 2007, 21:59
its still the same game, sorry for you. Some changes here and there, nothing major.. But Valley does not really give the best ET:QW experience :(
Parent
▼
Echo 10 Sep 2007, 21:56
its a nice game, but the movement seems somewhat laggy, atleast compared to ET
could be my fps though, haven't tweaked the game yet
ET movement is just so damn smooth :)
▼
Sainted 10 Sep 2007, 21:57
Sadly none of the games nowadays give such a smooth feeling as the Quake 3 engine was able to give :(
Parent
▼
hvK 10 Sep 2007, 21:58
My pc can finally run it thanks to the fix. :o
▼
antalis 10 Sep 2007, 22:05
WOW, what a shit game.
▼
Alpine 10 Sep 2007, 22:10
no way hosay
▼
IsolAtioN 10 Sep 2007, 22:15
i downloaded it but it's just not my game even if my computer would be good enough to play it without fps lags...
▼
quebratolas 10 Sep 2007, 22:37
sucks

the game engine is good but this game is poor slow unsynchronized(this is probably a need of adaptation to the game) and
" slijz on 10/09/07, 19:40:59
4. who is enemy? ah the red icon! dead "
▼
stena 10 Sep 2007, 22:43
played it 2 weeks and i have to say its not good
▼
bLiz 10 Sep 2007, 23:01
i like it. u should give a chance at the game!
Back to top