m_filter

by heaven • 1 Dec 2007, 12:37 • Journals
1, 0 or -1?

and why.

we're talking et here, ofc.
Comments
28
▼
Kiewan 1 Dec 2007, 12:39
raziel had 0
▼
nage 1 Dec 2007, 12:48
ferus have it 1
Parent
▼
Kiewan 1 Dec 2007, 12:49
but raziel > ferus ha-ha
Parent
▼
nage 1 Dec 2007, 12:50
Yea. But I dont really care about that, ha-ha-ha.
Parent
▼
rize 1 Dec 2007, 13:00
xD
Parent
▼
nage 1 Dec 2007, 13:02
: ? |
Parent
▼
rize 1 Dec 2007, 13:03
do u know the difference between 0 and 1?
what to use by an usb-mouse?
Parent
▼
nage 1 Dec 2007, 13:04
Nope. I have no clue, but I was told to use 0. So, I use 0 =D
Parent
▼
LeFiZip 1 Dec 2007, 12:40
0
more exact
▼
RazZaH 1 Dec 2007, 12:41
and what does it mean ?.. i mean what effect..
▼
Kiewan 1 Dec 2007, 12:42
toggles smooth mouse, don't know what they mean with that exactly
Parent
▼
heaven 1 Dec 2007, 12:51
It's suppose to "smooth" the mouse movements, but I suspect it makes it less accurate or more laggy. not sure.
Parent
▼
Kito 1 Dec 2007, 12:46
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
▼
dinev 1 Dec 2007, 12:49
wasn't it mouse acceleration or smthng?
▼
heaven 1 Dec 2007, 12:52
czm had m_filter 0 in his q3 config. I guess that counts for something, but I'm not sure if would be the exact same thing in all q3e games.

http://socrates.error.lt/q3/cfg/czm/user.cfg

edit: but cooller used m_filter 1. :p

http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=820539
▼
diph 1 Dec 2007, 12:55
lol it is the same as it is same engine...
Parent
▼
heaven 1 Dec 2007, 13:01
same engine, but it was always revised with each game, wasn't it? by different developers ...
Parent
▼
diph 1 Dec 2007, 13:03
never felt any difference in wsw, q3 and et :(
Parent
▼
lweebo 1 Dec 2007, 14:30
wsw isn't the same engine as q3 and ET :o
Parent
▼
diph 1 Dec 2007, 15:02
at least it`s based on q3 engine
Parent
▼
lweebo 1 Dec 2007, 18:29
No, it's the quake 2 engine
Parent
▼
rAzbo 1 Dec 2007, 13:18
it gives average mouse rates rather than acctual mouse rates which makes it feel smoother but less accurate
▼
heaven 1 Dec 2007, 13:19
best answer thus far. thanks.
Parent
▼
pupupup 1 Dec 2007, 13:26
RaZiel says that this cvar even dont work at all but I noticed difference when putting this on 1. Imo only useful with high sens. :)

Btw teKoa has set this in 1 in his cfg (dunno is it real or fake)

Sorry my bad hangover english.
Back to top