maybe this

by tetsuo • 1 Dec 2007, 17:36 • Journals
Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4 Ghz

Memory: Kingston 4 GB DDR2

Motherboard: MSI P35 Neo-FI

Hard Disk: Western Digital 320 GB SATA2 16 Mb Cache

VGA: MSI 8800 GTX 768 MB DDR3

OPtical: Dvd Writer 20x +/- R/Rw Dual Layer + Lightscribe

Sound: X-Fi Xtreme Gamer

Network: Gigabit LAN

Chest: Antec Sonata III met 500 Watt voeding

is this a good pc for 1200 € ? or what could be better? ;<

thx
Comments
31
▼
Deactivated6284 1 Dec 2007, 17:37
I wouldnt pay 50 dollars for it
▼
dAv1d 1 Dec 2007, 17:37
allmost the same as mine.
▼
BuLL 1 Dec 2007, 17:39
tough guy eh.. :D
Parent
▼
dAv1d 1 Dec 2007, 17:40
Harde pwner met je triple luger hs op gold tege me! Jij bent de stoere jonge hier :D
Parent
▼
tetsuo 1 Dec 2007, 17:48
hoe speelt ie dan? :p kwil n pc hebbe die tijdje meegaat, datk nie te snel weer nieuwe moet kope om nieuwe spelle te spele :p
Parent
▼
dAv1d 1 Dec 2007, 17:50
Alle spelle van nu draai ik op 125 FPS zonder prob. Cod 4 alles op hoogste np :p Echt wel nice hoor
Parent
▼
tetsuo 1 Dec 2007, 17:51
k thx, kga die dan wel pakke voor 1200 =)
Parent
▼
dreck 1 Dec 2007, 17:38
1200€ .. 16 years old .. sponsored by mommy and pappy ?!
▼
Xzz 1 Dec 2007, 17:39
when you were 16 you didnt have €1200? LOL!
Parent
▼
dreck 1 Dec 2007, 17:49
not really !?
Parent
▼
sentj 1 Dec 2007, 19:11
LOL i hope ur joking
Parent
▼
chosen 1 Dec 2007, 19:30
LOL i hope ur joking
Parent
▼
tetsuo 1 Dec 2007, 17:40
so? pls i have the same pc for 6 years now omg
Parent
▼
Quazz 1 Dec 2007, 17:41
I would take 3gb at max
▼
tetsuo 1 Dec 2007, 17:42
why? dunno lots bout pcs :p its an all-in pc
Parent
▼
Quazz 1 Dec 2007, 17:44
windows can only recognize up to 3.250 Gb or sth
Parent
▼
tetsuo 1 Dec 2007, 17:44
ahk good to know :D
Parent
▼
im a tree 1 Dec 2007, 17:58
Wow, do you have any more uninformed bullshit to spread?

a) 64bit windows can support upto 128gb
b) 32bit windows can see 4gb memory max, including virtual memory, if you set virtual memory to 0, then you have 4gb ram.
Parent
▼
Quazz 1 Dec 2007, 18:04
Nice replying to the wrong comment

Still I would only take 3 gb , because it wont use the full 4 Gb yet

Also , there was a MS article somewhere explaining that windows can only recognize up to 3.250 Gb ram

:X

There was a discussion about this in a previous journal where the article was posted
Parent
▼
im a tree 1 Dec 2007, 17:54
Why waste money on a quad core?

Explain. You could get a much faster duocore for that price.

Give me one good reason for getting a quad core.
▼
Quazz 1 Dec 2007, 17:57
Its very good for overclocking and multitasking

Even though I prefer dual-core myself

But it depends on what you need it for
Parent
▼
Uniq 1 Dec 2007, 17:58
multi tasking ffs!!!!!!!
Parent
▼
im a tree 1 Dec 2007, 17:59
Sorry, I didnt realise tetsuo wanted to recompile the latest linux kernal while encoding a video and running filters in photoshop whilst playing ET, my bad.
Parent
▼
zerender 1 Dec 2007, 18:27
future-proof




ahahahahah
Parent
▼
azznr 1 Dec 2007, 17:59
Quadcore < DualCore...
u save like 300-400 euro :o

Mine was 700 incl. Monitor :)
▼
zenix 1 Dec 2007, 19:36
neem 2 hardeschijven voor RAID 0. Het beste is samsung.
neem een 8800GT schild een hoop geld.
neem een Asus P5K P35 of een gigabyte p35 bord. Zorg voor raid ondersteuning. Die borden zijn beter dan de MSI vooral als je ook wilt overklokken.
▼
Taufik 1 Dec 2007, 19:50
etx op een mediocre pc = highskilled
etx op deze pc = highskilled

bespaar je doekoe ouwe
Back to top