Economics Help :(
•
3 Dec 2007, 22:28
•
Journals
Im having trouble with this question, it's based around the Quantity theory of money (Fisher Equation MV=PT) and Money Supply.
"Q2. Discuss whether increases in money supply would improve performance of the UK economy."
These are my ideas so far:
I'm going to include the fact that if you increase money supply and not enough aggregate demand is created = bad + its effects. But I need at least another advantage and disadvantage.
Any ideas?
"Q2. Discuss whether increases in money supply would improve performance of the UK economy."
These are my ideas so far:
I'm going to include the fact that if you increase money supply and not enough aggregate demand is created = bad + its effects. But I need at least another advantage and disadvantage.
Any ideas?
when you add money but not to much the people buy a the same "without even knowing they pay more"
this is also good cause when you lend some money from bank interest will be lower so you pay less
then if you add to much money (more than 2,5 procent plusminus)
foreign investers will leave the country
and the saving on long term for the small investers sucks
i think this is what you mean
rapter dunno why i replied to u sorry:D
If you increase the amount of money, the value will drop and it'll cause inflation.
Just wondering if there are any other problems linked to it (e.g Confidence and Speculation) or something?
if i am from belgium and i change a million euros in pounds
then you guys add money the next day
the day after i change pounds in euros i have more money
speculating or gambling or having information on this can make you rich :D
i say go tutor2u.net
The only way this works out well, is if the interest is low (so people will spend instead of save money.
You probably already know this. But maybe it helps.
Look into the expansive money politics and restrictive money politics.
imo:
Incerease of the money supply would bring the value of the pound down so prices would go up and ppl with the same paycheck as before could buy less -> less money would be brought back to the firms -> the firms would have to make less products (the money they would recive would cover less of the costs) -> less money would go to paychecks -> ppl could buy even less
soz for my terminology -> i study economics but dont know the english expressions. i hope u got the point.
that imo part is totaly wrong...
It's also probably worth writing a definition of what money supply is. At least that's what my economics teacher always says (to define key terms in exam questions and not assume the examiner knows what things mean.)